von dem Knesebeck Olaf, Klein Jens
Institute for Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 14;25(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12847-x.
In Germany, type of health insurance is an important aspect of health care inequalities because there is a dual structure of statutory and private health insurance and there are incentives for a preferential treatment of privately insured patients. Two questions will be addressed in the study: What are the public attitudes towards the dual system of health insurance and inequalities in health care between those with statutory and private insurance? Are these attitudes associated with socio-demographic characteristics, health insurance and political party preferences?
Based on a random sample, an online survey among the adult population (18 + years) in Germany was conducted (N = 2,201). Attitudes towards statutory and private health insurance were assessed using four items. Two items related to inequalities in access and quality of care; two were aimed at the system structure and remuneration. Age, gender, education, migration history, region of residence, health insurance and political party preference were included in the analyses as predictors.
About 77% of respondents agreed with the statement that all insured persons in Germany have the same access to medically necessary care. Women were less convinced in this respect. Just over 20% agreed with the statement that people with statutory and private health insurance receive the same quality of medical care. Agreement was particularly high among men, older people and those with private insurance. Almost 80% were in favor of abolishing the coexistence of statutory and private health insurance. Agreement was lower among privately insured people and supporters of the liberal party; however, even in these subgroups, a majority of over 60% were in favor of abolition. Just over 15% found the different remuneration of services for those with statutory and private insurance acceptable. Agreement was significantly higher among older people and those with private insurance.
A clear majority of the German population perceives inequalities in the quality of medical care between those with statutory or private health insurance and is in favor of abolishing the dual system of statutory and private health insurance. These majorities can be found in all socio-demographic subgroups and across all political party lines.
在德国,医疗保险类型是医疗保健不平等的一个重要方面,因为存在法定医疗保险和私人医疗保险的二元结构,且存在优待私人参保患者的激励措施。本研究将探讨两个问题:公众对医疗保险二元体系以及法定保险和私人保险人群在医疗保健方面的不平等持何种态度?这些态度是否与社会人口特征、医疗保险和政党偏好相关?
基于随机抽样,对德国成年人口(18岁及以上)进行了一项在线调查(N = 2201)。使用四个项目评估对法定医疗保险和私人医疗保险的态度。两个项目涉及就医机会和医疗质量的不平等;另外两个针对体系结构和薪酬。分析中纳入年龄、性别、教育程度、移民史、居住地区、医疗保险和政党偏好作为预测因素。
约77%的受访者同意德国所有参保人获得医疗必需护理的机会相同这一说法。女性在这方面的认可度较低。略多于20%的人同意法定保险和私人保险人群获得相同医疗质量的说法。男性、老年人和私人保险参保者的认可度尤其高。近80%的人赞成废除法定医疗保险和私人医疗保险并存的制度。私人保险参保者和自由党支持者的认可度较低;然而,即使在这些亚组中,超过60%的多数人也赞成废除。略多于15%的人认为法定保险和私人保险人群服务的不同薪酬是可以接受的。老年人和私人保险参保者的认可度明显更高。
德国绝大多数人口认为法定保险和私人保险人群在医疗质量上存在不平等,并赞成废除法定医疗保险和私人医疗保险的二元体系。所有社会人口亚组和所有政党阵营中都存在这些多数群体。