• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持医疗体系运转:一项关于荷兰医疗体系应对洪水准备情况的为期5年的多地点跨学科研究项目方案。

Keeping healthcare afloat: a protocol for a 5-year multi-sited interdisciplinary research project into preparedness of healthcare for floods in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Borst Robert A J, Abebe Yared Abayneh, van Vuuren Karin, Magana Julien, de Graaff Bert, Hinrichs-Krapels Saba, Kolen Bas, Pregnolato Maria, Schreijer Anja, Comes Tina, Jonkman Sebastiaan N, Bal Roland

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 14;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01338-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01338-4
PMID:40369547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12077005/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The 2021 European floods in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands significantly impacted healthcare. With climate change increasing flood risks, healthcare preparedness is essential. Floods affect healthcare directly and indirectly by disrupting patient access, damaging infrastructure and impeding care continuity. Our interdisciplinary research in the Netherlands systematically assesses flood impacts on healthcare, optimises disaster preparedness, patient logistics, and continuity and explores crisis governance, incorporating lessons from coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

Our multi-sited, interdisciplinary project titled "Pandemic lessons for flood disaster preparedness" includes literature reviews on: (i) the (in) direct impacts of floods on healthcare, (ii) disaster decision-making strategies and (iii) patient logistics during crises. Empirically, ethnographic methods (interviews, focus groups, document analyses, and observations) will: (a) assess hospital flood preparedness, (b) explore decision-making and crisis management strategies and (c) analyse the dynamics of health system governance during floods. Data from these sources and flood scenarios will inform models on healthcare impacts and decision-making, culminating in a simulation game for research and training.

DISCUSSION

This study offers a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach to understanding and improving healthcare system preparedness for floods. By integrating diverse fields such as healthcare governance, disaster risk management, logistics and hydraulic engineering, we provide a unique lens on resilience. A key strength is the incorporation of lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing us to draw parallels between pandemic response and flood preparedness. In addition, our simulation game serves as a robust tool for translating knowledge into practice. However, the study's reliance on collaboration with busy healthcare and disaster response professionals may limit engagement. Moreover, the absence of direct public and patient involvement in the research design, though partially mitigated by engaging representative organizations, presents a potential limitation. Lastly, the challenge of obtaining real-time data from flood events could introduce recall bias, but triangulation of various data sources aims to address this issue. Despite these challenges, the study's integration of long-term data from recent floods and focus on healthcare-specific crisis governance provides valuable insights for improving disaster preparedness.

摘要

引言

2021年德国、比利时和荷兰发生的欧洲洪水对医疗保健产生了重大影响。随着气候变化增加洪水风险,医疗保健准备工作至关重要。洪水通过扰乱患者就医、破坏基础设施和阻碍护理连续性,直接和间接地影响医疗保健。我们在荷兰进行的跨学科研究系统地评估了洪水对医疗保健的影响,优化了灾难准备、患者后勤保障和连续性,并借鉴2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的经验教训探索危机治理。

方法

我们的多地点跨学科项目“大流行对洪水灾难准备的启示”包括对以下方面的文献综述:(i)洪水对医疗保健的(非)直接影响,(ii)灾难决策策略,以及(iii)危机期间的患者后勤保障。在实证方面,人种学方法(访谈、焦点小组、文件分析和观察)将:(a)评估医院的洪水准备情况,(b)探索决策和危机管理策略,以及(c)分析洪水期间卫生系统治理的动态。来自这些来源的数据和洪水情景将为医疗保健影响和决策模型提供信息,最终形成一个用于研究和培训的模拟游戏。

讨论

本研究提供了一种全面的跨学科方法来理解和改善医疗保健系统对洪水的准备。通过整合医疗保健治理、灾害风险管理、物流和水利工程等不同领域,我们提供了一个关于复原力的独特视角。一个关键优势是纳入了COVID-19大流行的经验教训,使我们能够在大流行应对和洪水准备之间进行类比。此外,我们的模拟游戏是将知识转化为实践的有力工具。然而,该研究对与忙碌的医疗保健和灾难应对专业人员合作的依赖可能会限制参与度。此外,尽管通过与代表性组织合作部分缓解了这一问题,但研究设计中缺乏公众和患者的直接参与是一个潜在的限制。最后,从洪水事件中获取实时数据的挑战可能会引入回忆偏差,但对各种数据源的三角测量旨在解决这个问题。尽管存在这些挑战,但该研究整合了近期洪水的长期数据并专注于医疗保健特定的危机治理,为改善灾难准备提供了有价值的见解。

相似文献

1
Keeping healthcare afloat: a protocol for a 5-year multi-sited interdisciplinary research project into preparedness of healthcare for floods in the Netherlands.维持医疗体系运转:一项关于荷兰医疗体系应对洪水准备情况的为期5年的多地点跨学科研究项目方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 14;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01338-4.
2
Evaluation of flood preparedness in government healthcare facilities in Eastern Province, Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡东部省政府医疗机构的洪水防备评估。
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1331539. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1331539.
3
Prepared to react? Assessing the functional capacity of the primary health care system in rural Orissa, India to respond to the devastating flood of September 2008.是否做好应对准备?评估印度奥里萨邦农村初级卫生保健系统应对 2008 年 9 月毁灭性洪灾的功能能力。
Glob Health Action. 2012;5. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.10964. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
4
Primary healthcare system capacities for responding to storm and flood-related health problems: a case study from a rural district in central Vietnam.基层医疗保健系统应对风暴和洪水相关健康问题的能力:越南中部一个农村地区的案例研究
Glob Health Action. 2014 Dec 8;7:23007. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23007. eCollection 2014.
5
Perennial disaster patterns in Central Europe since 2000 and implications for hospital preparedness planning - a cross-sectional analysis.2000年以来中欧的常年灾害模式及其对医院应急准备规划的影响——一项横断面分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84223-4.
6
Improving flood disaster preparedness of hospitals in Central Thailand: Hospital personnel perspectives.提高泰国中部医院的防洪备灾能力:医院人员的观点。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Apr;31(7-8):1073-1081. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15971. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
A survey of flood disaster preparedness among hospitals in the central region of Thailand.泰国中部地区医院的洪灾备灾情况调查。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016 Nov;19(4):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst-An Assessment of Flood Preparedness at Primary Health Care Facilities in Central Vietnam.抱最好的希望,做最坏的准备——对越南中部基层医疗设施防洪准备情况的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;15(12):2689. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122689.
9
Healthcare and successive natural disasters: Lessons still to be learned.医疗保健与连续自然灾害:仍有教训值得汲取。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2024 Mar;37(2):108-112. doi: 10.1177/08404704231219996. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
10
Flood disaster preparedness experiences of hospital personnel in Thailand: A qualitative study.泰国医院工作人员的洪灾备灾经验:一项定性研究。
Australas Emerg Care. 2018 Aug;21(3):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the 2021 flood on the outpatient care in the North Rhine region, Germany: a cross-sectional study.2021 年洪水对德国北莱茵地区门急诊服务的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17279-y.
2
The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms.柳叶刀倒计时 2023 年健康与气候变化报告:在世界面临不可逆转损害的情况下,以健康为中心应对的紧迫性。
Lancet. 2023 Dec 16;402(10419):2346-2394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
'Nurses are seen as general cargo, not the smart TVs you ship carefully': the politics of nurse staffing in England, Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2023 Oct;18(4):411-425. doi: 10.1017/S1744133123000178. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Framing the pandemic: Multiplying "crises" in Dutch healthcare governance during the emerging COVID-19 pandemic.框定疫情:新兴 COVID-19 大流行期间荷兰医疗保健治理中的“危机”倍增。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:115998. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115998. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Prevalence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder After Flood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.洪水后创伤后应激障碍的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 23;13:890671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.890671. eCollection 2022.
6
COVID-19 and resilience of healthcare systems in ten countries.COVID-19 与十个国家的医疗体系韧性
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1314-1324. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01750-1. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
7
From sustainability to sustaining work: What do actors do to sustain knowledge translation platforms?从可持续性到持续开展工作:行动者如何维持知识转化平台?
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114735. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114735. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
Layering risk work amidst an emerging crisis: an ethnographic study on the governance of the COVID-19 pandemic in a university hospital in the Netherlands.在新出现的危机中叠加风险工作:对荷兰一家大学医院新冠疫情治理的人种志研究
Health Risk Soc. 2021 Apr 5;23(3-4):111-127. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2021.1910210. eCollection 2021.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Unmasking a health care system: the Dutch policy response to the Covid-19 crisis.揭开医疗保健系统的面纱:荷兰对新冠疫情危机的政策应对。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Jan;17(1):27-36. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000128. Epub 2021 Mar 5.