Punjabi Nihal, Qu Roy W, Vacaru Alexandra, Pandey Brianna, Tamares Shanalee, Inman Jared C
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Loma Linda University Health Loma Linda California USA.
Case Western Reserve-School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 May 14;10(3):e70154. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70154. eCollection 2025 Jun.
This systematic review aimed to determine the clinical utility of various physical exam findings in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
A systematic review of English articles identified from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included "sleep apnea," "physical exam," "polysomnography," and all relevant synonyms. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, reviewed full texts, and extracted data from all studies that presented associations between physical characteristics and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).
A total of 35 studies representing 13,854 patients were included in this review. The mean difference between high AHI and low AHI groups was 4.09 kg/m (95% CI: 2.78-5.39) for BMI, 7.93 cm (3.59-12.28) for waist circumference, and 3.67 cm (2.64-4.71) for neck circumference. The odds ratios for having a high AHI were 2.44 (1.07-5.55) for macroglossia, 2.23 (1.68-2.96) for Mallampati > 2, 1.88 (1.67-2.11) for tonsil grade > 2, 3.99 (1.94-8.21) for pharyngeal grade > 2, and 1.57 (1.48-1.67) for enlarged uvula. Thyromental distance, retrognathia, Friedman grade, septal deviation, and enlarged turbinates were also assessed and were not found to be statistically significant between AHI groups.
Several physical exams have strong evidence in the literature supporting their strength at differentiating patients with and without OSA. These should be used routinely among providers who treat OSA, regardless of specialty, to help guide decisions about recommending a sleep study and selecting appropriate treatment. Other physical characteristics may be better assessed through advanced exam techniques or require more research and standardization in the way they are assessed by practitioners.
本系统评价旨在确定各种体格检查结果在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)诊断中的临床实用性。
对从PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL和科学网数据库中检索到的英文文章进行系统评价。检索词包括“睡眠呼吸暂停”“体格检查”“多导睡眠图”以及所有相关同义词。两名评价者独立筛选摘要、审阅全文,并从所有呈现身体特征与呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)之间关联的研究中提取数据。
本评价共纳入35项研究,涉及13854例患者。高AHI组与低AHI组之间的平均差异为:BMI为4.09kg/m(95%CI:2.78 - 5.39),腰围为7.93cm(3.59 - 12.28),颈围为3.67cm(2.64 - 4.71)。巨舌症患者AHI高的比值比为2.44(1.07 - 5.55),Mallampati评分>2的患者为2.23(1.68 - 2.96),扁桃体分级>2的患者为1.88(1.67 - 2.11),咽部分级>2的患者为3.99(1.94 - 8.21),悬雍垂增大的患者为1.57(1.48 - 1.67)。还评估了颏甲距离、下颌后缩、Friedman分级、鼻中隔偏曲和鼻甲肿大情况,发现AHI组之间无统计学意义。
多项体格检查在文献中有强有力的证据支持其在区分有无OSA患者方面的优势。在治疗OSA的医疗人员中,无论其专业如何,都应常规使用这些检查,以帮助指导关于推荐睡眠研究和选择适当治疗的决策。其他身体特征可能通过先进的检查技术能得到更好的评估,或者在从业者评估方式上需要更多的研究和标准化。