• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将个体定义的脑健康优先事项纳入临床试验结果:美国的电子个性化结果测量方法。

Incorporating individually defined brain health priorities in clinical trial outcomes: the electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure approach in the United States.

作者信息

Saunders Stina, Jannati Ali, Sheehan Shane, Toro-Serey Claudio, Tobyne Sean, McManus Killian, Bates David, Showalter John, Pascual-Leone Álvaro

机构信息

Linus Health, Inc. Boston Massachusetts USA.

Usher Institute University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 13;11(2):e70088. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70088. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.1002/trc2.70088
PMID:40370494
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075095/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While a limited number of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been approved in the United States, there is caution in adopting these treatments in clinical use. The electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) tool was recently developed to establish whether, besides modifying underlying AD pathology, new treatments exerted sufficient beneficial effects in areas that matter the most to an individual.

METHODS

We conducted a study to understand how findings from the ePSOM UK study applied in the United States. The ePSOM US survey (May 2023 to January 2024) collected primarily free-text responses in personally defined brain health priorities, alongside self-reported confidence in managing these priorities. We used natural language processing (k-means clustering of GloVe vectors) and chi-squared tests to examine differences between the US and UK populations' answers. We used a Mann-Whitney test to compare the confidence ratings between participants with and without a self-reported diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 764 participants in the United States (68.8% female; 74.2% high educational attainment) with a total of 9010 free-text responses, of whom 53 individuals (6.90%) reported neurodegenerative disease diagnosis. The comparable sample from the UK survey included 4529 participants with a total of 38,056 responses. There were statistically significant differences in the proportion of responses between the US and UK populations. The diagnosis group showed a significant difference in average total scores of self-reported confidence compared with those without a diagnosis (median score 21, interquartile range [IQR] = 17 to 23 vs median score 24, IQR = 22 to 25, = 8908,  < .01).

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates heterogeneity in individual-level brain health priorities in the US and differences between the US and UK populations. The diagnosis group was significantly less confident in managing personally meaningful priorities. These findings support our hypothesis that what constitutes meaningful treatment benefits should be determined at an individual rather than group level, and cultural context needs to be considered.

HIGHLIGHTS

The study captured individually defined treatment priorities.A self-reported confidence rating was used to assess how people manage their most meaningful areas of lifeThe study found differences between US and UK participants' priorities.Neurodegenerative disease is associated with lower confidence in managing priorities.The ePSOM tool offers a method to assess meaningful treatment benefits.

摘要

引言

虽然美国已批准了有限数量的用于治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的疾病修饰疗法,但在临床应用中采用这些疗法时需谨慎。最近开发了电子个人特定结果测量(ePSOM)工具,以确定除了改变AD潜在病理外,新疗法是否在对个体最重要的领域产生了足够的有益效果。

方法

我们开展了一项研究,以了解ePSOM英国研究的结果如何应用于美国。ePSOM美国调查(2023年5月至2024年1月)主要收集了关于个人定义的大脑健康优先事项的自由文本回复,以及自我报告的管理这些优先事项的信心。我们使用自然语言处理(GloVe向量的k均值聚类)和卡方检验来检查美国和英国人群答案之间的差异。我们使用曼-惠特尼检验来比较有和没有自我报告神经退行性疾病诊断的参与者之间的信心评分。

结果

我们的分析纳入了美国的764名参与者(68.8%为女性;74.2%具有高学历),共有9010条自由文本回复,其中53人(6.90%)报告了神经退行性疾病诊断。英国调查的可比样本包括4529名参与者,共有38056条回复。美国和英国人群的回复比例存在统计学上的显著差异。诊断组与未诊断组相比,自我报告信心的平均总分存在显著差异(中位数分数21,四分位间距[IQR]=17至23,而中位数分数24,IQR=22至25,Z=8908,P<0.01)。

讨论

我们的研究表明美国个体层面大脑健康优先事项存在异质性,以及美国和英国人群之间存在差异。诊断组在管理个人有意义的优先事项方面信心明显较低。这些发现支持了我们的假设,即构成有意义治疗益处的因素应在个体而非群体层面确定,并且需要考虑文化背景。

要点

该研究获取了个人定义的治疗优先事项。使用自我报告的信心评分来评估人们如何管理他们生活中最有意义的领域。该研究发现美国和英国参与者的优先事项存在差异。神经退行性疾病与管理优先事项的信心较低有关。ePSOM工具提供了一种评估有意义治疗益处的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beb7/12075095/cc2d950a65fe/TRC2-11-e70088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beb7/12075095/cc2d950a65fe/TRC2-11-e70088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beb7/12075095/cc2d950a65fe/TRC2-11-e70088-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Incorporating individually defined brain health priorities in clinical trial outcomes: the electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure approach in the United States.将个体定义的脑健康优先事项纳入临床试验结果:美国的电子个性化结果测量方法。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 13;11(2):e70088. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70088. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Impact of clinical symptoms and diagnosis: the electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) development programme.临床症状与诊断的影响:电子个人特定结局测量(ePSOM)开发项目
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Apr 5;6(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00433-2.
4
A UK-Wide Study Employing Natural Language Processing to Determine What Matters to People about Brain Health to Improve Drug Development: The Electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) Programme.一项利用自然语言处理技术确定人们对大脑健康关注的英国范围内的研究,旨在改善药物开发:电子个体化结局测量(ePSOM)计划。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(4):448-456. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.30.
5
Towards a lifelong personalized brain health program: empowering individuals to define, pursue, and monitor meaningful outcomes.迈向终身个性化脑健康计划:赋能个人定义、追求并监测有意义的成果。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1387206. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1387206. eCollection 2024.
6
7
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.以目标为导向的认知康复治疗早期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆: GREAT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
8
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Progress in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Is Needed - Position Statement of European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) Investigators.需要在阿尔茨海默病治疗方面取得进展——欧洲阿尔茨海默病联合会(EADC)研究人员的立场声明。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.153.
2
Considering challenges for the new Alzheimer's drugs: Clinical, population, and health system perspectives.考虑新的阿尔茨海默病药物面临的挑战:临床、人群和卫生系统视角。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):6639-6646. doi: 10.1002/alz.14108. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
Lecanemab and Donanemab as Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease: An Illustrated Perspective on the Data.
莱卡奈单抗和多奈单抗治疗阿尔茨海默病:数据的图解视角
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 1;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0319-23.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
4
Towards a lifelong personalized brain health program: empowering individuals to define, pursue, and monitor meaningful outcomes.迈向终身个性化脑健康计划:赋能个人定义、追求并监测有意义的成果。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1387206. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1387206. eCollection 2024.
5
Donanemab, another anti-Alzheimer's drug with risk and uncertain benefit.多奈哌齐,另一种具有风险和不确定益处的抗阿尔茨海默病药物。
Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Aug;99:102348. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102348. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
6
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2024 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3708-3821. doi: 10.1002/alz.13809. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024 Apr 24;10(2):e12465. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12465. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
8
The search for clarity regarding "clinically meaningful outcomes" in Alzheimer disease clinical trials: CLARITY-AD and Beyond.探寻阿尔茨海默病临床试验中“有临床意义的结局”的清晰度:CLARITY-AD 及以后。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Feb 16;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01412-z.
9
Relationships of change in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) on patient outcomes and probability of progression: observational analysis.临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)变化与患者结局和进展概率的关系:观察性分析。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Feb 15;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01399-7.
10
Aduhelm: Biogen abandons Alzheimer's drug after controversial approval left it unfunded by Medicare.阿杜海姆:百健放弃阿尔茨海默病药物,此前有争议的批准使其无法获得医疗保险资金支持。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 2;384:q281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q281.