Zhang Lianghui, Lin Lili, Ni Jie, Ling Tao, Huang Lingli
Department of Oncology, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213004, P.R. China.
Department of Pharmacy, Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2025 May 2;30(1):323. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15069. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and modified GPS (mGPS) have value in evaluating the prognosis of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, with the continuous emergence of new research, the predictive value of GPS and mGPS for immunotherapy deserves further validation. The aim of the present study was to explore the predictive value of GPS or mGPS on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced cancer receiving ICIs. Eligible studies were systematically searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science databases until November 2022. Published data were extracted and the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. A total of 18 studies with 1,355 patients were included in the present study. Patients were divided into the low GPS/mGPS (0) and high GPS/mGPS (1/2/1-2) groups. Overall, the high GPS group had a shorter OS (HR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.06-4.03) with high heterogeneity, and a shorter PFS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.55-2.78) with low heterogeneity, compared with the low GPS group. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable and the heterogeneity was significantly reduced from 56.4 to 30.3% after excluding one study. Subgroup analyses by score showed that GPS 1, GPS 2 and GPS 1-2 all had a poorer OS than GPS 0, with low heterogeneity. Overall, the high mGPS group had a poorer OS (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.76-3.72) with low heterogeneity, and a poorer PFS (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.81-3.60) with high heterogeneity, compared with the low mGPS group. The combined effect size was consistent but the heterogeneity was not eliminated after sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analyses by country and score also showed that the country had no effect on the results and that mGPS 1, mGPS 2 and mGPS 1-2 had a poorer PFS than mGPS 0. Therefore, high GPS and mGPS may be effective biomarkers for predicting the survival of patients with cancer receiving ICIs. Patients with high GPS and mGPS may be considered for supportive treatment; however, large prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.
格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)和改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)在评估接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的患者预后方面具有价值。然而,随着新研究的不断涌现,GPS和mGPS对免疫治疗的预测价值值得进一步验证。本研究的目的是探讨GPS或mGPS对接受ICI治疗的晚期癌症患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的预测价值。使用PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库系统检索符合条件的研究,检索截止至2022年11月。提取已发表的数据,并汇总具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(HR)。本研究共纳入18项研究,涉及1355例患者。患者被分为低GPS/mGPS(0)组和高GPS/mGPS(1/2/1 - 2)组。总体而言,与低GPS组相比,高GPS组的OS较短(HR,2.88;95%CI,2.06 - 4.03),异质性较高,PFS较短(HR,2.08;95%CI,1.55 - 2.78),异质性较低。敏感性分析表明结果稳定,排除一项研究后异质性从56.4%显著降低至30.3%。按评分进行的亚组分析表明,GPS 1、GPS 2和GPS 1 - 2的OS均比GPS 0差,异质性较低。总体而言,与低mGPS组相比,高mGPS组的OS较差(HR,2.56;95%CI,1.76 - 3.72),异质性较低,PFS较差(HR,2.55;95%CI,1.81 - 3.60),异质性较高。敏感性分析后合并效应量一致,但异质性未消除。按国家和评分进行的亚组分析还表明,国家对结果无影响,mGPS 1、mGPS 2和mGPS 1 - 2的PFS比mGPS 0差。因此,高GPS和mGPS可能是预测接受ICI治疗的癌症患者生存情况的有效生物标志物。GPS和mGPS高的患者可考虑进行支持性治疗;然而,需要大型前瞻性试验来验证这些发现。