• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全面分析格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)/改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)对晚期癌症患者免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响。

A comprehensive analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)/the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy among patients with advanced cancer.

机构信息

Cancer Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4940. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.4940
PMID:35702873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9844653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association between Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and clinical outcomes in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to examine the prognostic performance of GPS and mGPS in patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

Eligible studies were retrieved from searches of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until July 2021. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by using fixed-effect or random-effects model to evaluate the influence of GPS/mGPS on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 1164 patients were included. Overall, mGPS score of 2 and 1 were related to inferior OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed no significant association between mGPS score of 1 and OS in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while this score was significantly associated with poor PFS in patients with NSCLC and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Higher GPS (score of 1 or 2) were associated with poor clinical outcomes (OS: p < 0.001; PFS: p = 0.036). Subgroup analysis showed high GPS levels were linked to worse OS in patients with NSCLC and gastric cancer, but not for PFS in these patients. Regarding test time point, GPS was related to worse OS and PFS in pre-treatment GPS group, but not in post-treatment GPS group.

CONCLUSION

GPS and mGPS showed great potential to predict survival in patients treated with ICIs. Large and perspective trial are warranted to further validate these findings.

摘要

背景

格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)和改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)与接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的患者的临床结局之间的关联仍存在争议。因此,本荟萃分析旨在研究 GPS 和 mGPS 在接受 ICI 治疗的患者中的预后表现。

方法

从 EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中检索符合条件的研究,检索时间截至 2021 年 7 月。使用固定效应或随机效应模型汇总风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),以评估 GPS/mGPS 对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。

结果

共纳入 1164 名患者。总体而言,mGPS 评分为 2 分和 1 分与较差的 OS(p<0.001)和 PFS(p<0.001)相关。亚组分析显示,mGPS 评分为 1 分与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的 OS 无显著相关性,但与 NSCLC 和头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的不良 PFS 相关。较高的 GPS(评分为 1 或 2)与较差的临床结局相关(OS:p<0.001;PFS:p=0.036)。亚组分析显示,高 GPS 水平与 NSCLC 和胃癌患者的 OS 较差相关,但对这些患者的 PFS 无影响。关于检测时间点,GPS 在治疗前 GPS 组与 OS 和 PFS 相关,但在治疗后 GPS 组中则不相关。

结论

GPS 和 mGPS 显示出在接受 ICI 治疗的患者中预测生存的巨大潜力。需要进行大型前瞻性试验来进一步验证这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/13b22a4b4465/CAM4-12-38-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/b767e16a1cec/CAM4-12-38-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/bde5e90dae78/CAM4-12-38-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/0888978d0dc9/CAM4-12-38-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/13b22a4b4465/CAM4-12-38-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/b767e16a1cec/CAM4-12-38-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/bde5e90dae78/CAM4-12-38-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/0888978d0dc9/CAM4-12-38-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ef/9844653/13b22a4b4465/CAM4-12-38-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comprehensive analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)/the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy among patients with advanced cancer.全面分析格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)/改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)对晚期癌症患者免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4940. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
A high Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) or modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) predicts poor prognosis in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)或改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)可预测妇科恶性肿瘤的不良预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1543-1551. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05581-8. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Pre-treatment Glasgow prognostic score and modified Glasgow prognostic score may be potential prognostic biomarkers in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗前格拉斯哥预后评分和改良格拉斯哥预后评分可能是泌尿系统癌症潜在的预后生物标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct;7(20):531. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.160.
4
Clinical utility of pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者治疗前格拉斯哥预后评分的临床效用
Lung Cancer. 2021 Feb;152:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.11.026. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
5
A Meta-Analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Biomarkers for Predicting Survival Outcome in Renal Cell Carcinoma.格拉斯哥预后评分和改良格拉斯哥预后评分作为预测肾细胞癌生存结局生物标志物的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 17;10:1541. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01541. eCollection 2020.
6
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Glasgow Prognostic Score/Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.预处理格拉斯哥预后评分/改良格拉斯哥预后评分在卵巢癌中的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(6):1968-1975. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2021.1980591. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic indicators in patients with head and neck malignancy treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.头颈部恶性肿瘤患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的预后指标的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):18215-18240. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05504-5. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Baseline Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Associated with Survival in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.基线改良格拉斯哥预后评分与接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者的生存情况相关。
Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):397-405. doi: 10.1002/onco.13727. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Prognostic Value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score or Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving Various Treatments: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.格拉斯哥预后评分或改良格拉斯哥预后评分对接受不同治疗的结直肠癌患者的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51(3):1237-1249. doi: 10.1159/000495500. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients with high PD-L1 expression administered first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.预处理格拉斯哥预后评分预测 PD-L1 高表达患者接受一线帕博利珠单抗单药治疗非小细胞肺癌的生存情况。
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(20):6971-6984. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4220. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of the pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score or modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期癌症患者治疗前格拉斯哥预后评分或改良格拉斯哥预后评分的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncol Lett. 2025 May 2;30(1):323. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15069. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Baseline (modified) Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of therapeutic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.基线(改良)格拉斯哥预后评分作为实体瘤对免疫检查点抑制剂治疗反应的预测指标:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncol Lett. 2025 Feb 13;29(4):184. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14931. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Failure of Immunotherapy-The Molecular and Immunological Origin of Immunotherapy Resistance in Lung Cancer.免疫疗法失败——肺癌免疫疗法耐药的分子和免疫学起源。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 21;22(16):9030. doi: 10.3390/ijms22169030.
2
Prognostic Utility of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio in Head and Neck Cancers: A Detailed PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血小板-淋巴细胞比率、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和单核细胞-淋巴细胞比率在头颈癌中的预后效用:一项符合PRISMA标准的详细系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 19;13(16):4166. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164166.
3
Prognostic value of preoperative modified Glasgow prognostic score in predicting overall survival in breast cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study.术前改良格拉斯哥预后评分对乳腺癌患者总生存期的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Oncol Lett. 2025 Feb 11;29(4):180. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14926. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Prognostic Value of Blood-Based Inflammatory Markers in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.基于血液的炎症标志物在接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者中的预后价值。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;17(1):37. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010037.
5
The association between an inflammation-based nutritional tool (Glasgow Prognostic Score) and length of hospital stay in patients with haematological cancer.炎症为基础的营养工具(格拉斯哥预后评分)与血液肿瘤患者住院时间的相关性。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 19;32(12):804. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09021-0.
6
Use of Preoperative Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Unresectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.术前免疫疗法在局部晚期不可切除皮肤鳞状细胞癌中的应用:一例报告
Case Rep Oncol. 2024 Oct 3;17(1):1109-1114. doi: 10.1159/000540842. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in NSCLC patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis.改良格拉斯哥预后评分在接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的预后意义:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 11;14:1449853. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1449853. eCollection 2024.
8
Inflammation‑based prognostic markers in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer treated with nivolumab: Tokushukai REAl‑world Data project 02 (TREAD 02).纳武利尤单抗治疗晚期或复发性胃癌患者的基于炎症的预后标志物:德洲会真实世界数据项目02(TREAD 02)
Mol Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 3;21(6):90. doi: 10.3892/mco.2024.2788. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
The prevalence and prognostic value of systemic inflammation in good performance status patients with advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: Comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.在接受姑息性放疗的身体状况良好的晚期、不可手术的非小细胞肺癌患者中,全身炎症的流行率和预后价值:复合比和累积评分的比较。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70139. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70139.
10
The prognostic value and model construction of inflammatory markers for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.炎症标志物对非小细胞肺癌患者的预后价值及模型构建。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):7568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57814-4.
Inflammation-Related Biomarkers for the Prediction of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
炎症相关生物标志物预测结直肠癌患者预后。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 27;22(15):8002. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158002.
4
Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma Treatment: An Update.黑色素瘤治疗中对免疫检查点抑制剂耐药的分子机制:最新进展
Biomedicines. 2021 Jul 18;9(7):835. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9070835.
5
The journey of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a biomarker in breast cancer: clinical utility in an era of checkpoint inhibition.肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞作为乳腺癌生物标志物的探索之旅:在检查点抑制时代的临床应用。
Ann Oncol. 2021 Oct;32(10):1236-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
6
PD-L1 regulation revisited: impact on immunotherapeutic strategies.重新审视PD-L1调控:对免疫治疗策略的影响
Trends Mol Med. 2021 Sep;27(9):868-881. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
TMB or not TMB as a biomarker: That is the question.TMB 还是 TMB 作为生物标志物:这是个问题。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jul;163:103374. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103374. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Dynamic Immune/Inflammation Precision Medicine: The Good and the Bad Inflammation in Infection and Cancer.动态免疫/炎症精准医学:感染和癌症中的有益和有害炎症。
Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 23;12:595722. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.595722. eCollection 2021.
9
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts survival among advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma patients treated with anti-PD1 agents.改良格拉斯哥预后评分可预测抗 PD-1 药物治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存情况。
Anticancer Drugs. 2021 Jun 1;32(5):567-574. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001060.
10
Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer.预处理格拉斯哥预后评分作为纳武利尤单抗治疗晚期胃癌患者结局的预测指标。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247645. eCollection 2021.