Scarpelli Serena, Spinoni Marta, Gorgoni Maurizio, Lasaponara Stefano, Ciolli Paola, Rech Francesco, Di Muzio Marco, Med Carlotta, Di Pasquale Benedetti Ilaria, Grano Caterina, De Gennaro Luigi
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Body and Action Lab, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2025 May 9;17:851-864. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S520737. eCollection 2025.
This study investigated dream characteristics in women during the first trimester of pregnancy compared to a group of non-pregnant women, aiming to identify variables associated with the observed differences.
A sample of 100 pregnant women in their first trimester was compared to a control group of 100 age-matched non-pregnant women. Participants completed online questionnaires to assess dream activity, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and sociodemographic variables.
Controlling for socio-demographic variables, statistical comparisons revealed that pregnant women reported fewer nightmares and showed less interest in their dream activity compared to non-pregnant women. Ordinal logistic regression revealed that being in the control group, greater attention to dreams, the presence of depressive symptoms, and a higher frequency of lucid dreaming were significant predictors of more frequent nightmares. Moderation analysis showed no significant interaction between pregnancy status and dream attitude.
Contrary to expectations, first-trimester pregnant women had fewer nightmares than non-pregnant women. However, the results are coherent with the finding that parasomnia-like events decrease during pregnancy. The rapid hormonal changes and specific sleep and emotional features of this stage of gestation may explain the lower presence of nightmares as compared to our control group. Moreover, we confirmed a crucial role of dream attitude in recalling nightmares, suggesting that some stable, trait-like features may contribute to nightmare experiences independently of pregnancy status. Our results also confirmed, according to the Continuity hypothesis, that depressive symptoms are associated with nightmares. Also, the presence of lucid dreaming in association with nightmares may be interpreted as an attempt to cope with unpleasant emotions. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine how dream activity evolves across pregnancy stages.
本研究调查了孕早期女性与非孕女性的梦境特征,旨在确定与观察到的差异相关的变量。
将100名孕早期孕妇的样本与100名年龄匹配的非孕女性对照组进行比较。参与者完成在线问卷,以评估梦境活动、睡眠质量、抑郁症状和社会人口统计学变量。
在控制社会人口统计学变量后,统计比较显示,与非孕女性相比,孕妇报告的噩梦较少,且对自己的梦境活动兴趣较低。有序逻辑回归显示,处于对照组、对梦境关注度更高、存在抑郁症状以及清醒梦频率更高是噩梦更频繁出现的显著预测因素。调节分析显示妊娠状态与梦境态度之间无显著交互作用。
与预期相反,孕早期孕妇的噩梦比非孕女性少。然而,这些结果与孕期类睡行症样事件减少的发现是一致的。妊娠这个阶段快速的激素变化以及特定的睡眠和情绪特征可能解释了与对照组相比噩梦出现频率较低的原因。此外,我们证实了梦境态度在回忆噩梦方面的关键作用,表明一些稳定的、类似特质的特征可能独立于妊娠状态而导致噩梦体验。根据连续性假设,我们的结果还证实了抑郁症状与噩梦有关。此外,清醒梦与噩梦同时出现可能被解释为应对不愉快情绪的一种尝试。需要进行纵向研究来考察梦境活动在整个孕期如何演变。