Zhào Hóngyi, Zhang Zhiqiang, Bai Yinxia, Li Peng, Huang Yonghua
Sleep Center, NO 984 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Neurosci. 2025 Apr 30;19:1574544. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1574544. eCollection 2025.
Sleep loss is reported to affect postural control. However, the relationship between increased postural sway and the circadian rhythm (CR) remains unclear.
To assess performance in the postural control test in aged individuals with an abnormal CR.
This cross-sectional observational study included two groups of participants: those at high risk of falling (HFR) and those at low risk of falling (LFR), which was determined by the clinical cut-off score for the sway path with open eyes. Each participant wore an ActiGraph device on their non-dominant hand for 5-7 days. A non-parametric analysis of CR variables, including interdaily stability (IS), intraday variability (IV), relative amplitude (RA), interdaily coefficient of variation (ICV), etc., was used to evaluate the postural stability with a posturographic platform during a 30-s static balance test under the eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO) condition.
Individuals in the HFR group demonstrated significantly higher scores in the Downton fall risk index (DFRI), higher ICV, and lower IS and M10 activity counts than the LFR group. Linear regression analysis revealed that under the EO condition, there was no association between postural control and CR disruption; however, under the EC condition, L5 was positively associated with variables reflecting an increase in postural sway.
Increased postural sway was found to be associated with CR disruption in aged adults under the EC condition.
据报道,睡眠不足会影响姿势控制。然而,姿势摆动增加与昼夜节律(CR)之间的关系仍不清楚。
评估昼夜节律异常的老年人在姿势控制测试中的表现。
这项横断面观察性研究包括两组参与者:跌倒高风险组(HFR)和跌倒低风险组(LFR),这是通过睁眼时摆动路径的临床临界分数确定的。每位参与者在其非优势手上佩戴一台活动记录仪5至7天。在闭眼(EC)和睁眼(EO)条件下,通过姿势描记平台进行30秒静态平衡测试,同时使用非参数分析CR变量,包括日间稳定性(IS)、日内变异性(IV)、相对振幅(RA)、日间变异系数(ICV)等,以评估姿势稳定性。
与LFR组相比,HFR组个体在唐顿跌倒风险指数(DFRI)中的得分显著更高,ICV更高,IS和M10活动计数更低。线性回归分析显示,在EO条件下,姿势控制与CR紊乱之间无关联;然而,在EC条件下,L5与反映姿势摆动增加的变量呈正相关。
发现在EC条件下,老年人姿势摆动增加与CR紊乱有关。