Faculty of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Therapy, Reiwa Health Sciences University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Faculty of Medicine Science, Department of Physical Therapy, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0269145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269145. eCollection 2022.
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) is generally assumed to inhibit cortical excitability. The parietal cortex contributes to multisensory information processing in the postural control system, and this processing is proposed to be different between the right and left hemispheres and sensory modality. However, previous studies did not clarify whether the effects of unilateral C-tDCS of the parietal cortex on the postural control system differ depending on the hemisphere. We investigated the changes in static postural stability after unilateral C-tDCS of the parietal cortex.
Ten healthy right-handed participants were recruited for right- and left-hemisphere tDCS and sham stimulation, respectively. The cathodal electrode was placed on either the right or left parietal area, whereas the anodal electrode was placed over the contralateral orbit. tDCS was applied at 1.5 mA for 15 min. We evaluated static standing balance by measuring the sway path length (SPL), mediolateral sway path length (ML-SPL), anteroposterior sway path length (AP-SPL), sway area, and the SPL per unit area (L/A) after 15-minute C-tDCS under eyes open (EO) and closed (EC) conditions. To evaluate the effects of C-tDCS on pre- and post-offline trials, each parameter was compared using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with factors of intervention and time. A post-hoc evaluation was performed using a paired t-test. The effect sizes were evaluated according to standardized size-effect indices of partial eta-squared (ηp2) and Cohen's d. The power analysis was calculated (1-β).
A significant interaction was observed between intervention and time for SPL (F (2, 27) = 4.740, p = 0.017, ηp2 = 0.260), ML-SPL (F (2, 27) = 4.926, p = 0.015, ηp2 = 0.267), and sway area (F (2, 27) = 9.624, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.416) in the EO condition. C-tDCS over the right hemisphere significantly increased the SPL (p < 0.01, d = 0.51), ML-SPL (p < 0.01, d = 0.52), and sway area (p < 0.05, d = 0.83) in the EO condition. In contrast, C-tDCS over the left hemisphere significantly increased the L/A in both the EC and EO condition (EO; p < 0.05, d = 0.67, EC; p < 0.05, d = 0.57).
These results suggest that the right parietal region contributes to static standing balance through chiefly visual information processing during the EO condition. On the other hand, L/A increase during EC and EO by tDCS over the left parietal region depends more on somatosensory information to maintain static standing balance during the EC condition.
阴极经颅直流电刺激(C-tDCS)通常被认为会抑制皮质兴奋性。顶叶皮层在姿势控制系统中的多感觉信息处理中起作用,并且据推测,这种处理在左右半球和感觉模态之间存在差异。然而,先前的研究并未阐明单侧顶叶皮层的 C-tDCS 是否会因半球而异而对姿势控制系统产生不同的影响。我们研究了单侧顶叶皮层 C-tDCS 对姿势控制系统的静态姿势稳定性的变化。
招募了 10 名健康的右利手参与者,分别进行右半球和左半球 tDCS 以及假刺激。阴极电极放置在右或左顶叶区域,而阳极电极放置在对侧眼眶上。以 1.5 mA 进行 15 分钟 tDCS。在睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC)条件下,在 15 分钟 C-tDCS 后,通过测量摆动路径长度(SPL)、左右摆动路径长度(ML-SPL)、前后摆动路径长度(AP-SPL)、摆动面积和单位面积上的 SPL(L/A)来评估静态站立平衡。为了评估 C-tDCS 对离线前后试验的影响,使用两因素重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较每个参数,因素为干预和时间。使用配对 t 检验进行事后评估。根据偏 eta 平方(ηp2)和 Cohen 的 d 的标准化大小效应指数评估效应大小。计算了功效分析(1-β)。
在 EO 条件下,SPL(F(2,27)=4.740,p=0.017,ηp2=0.260)、ML-SPL(F(2,27)=4.926,p=0.015,ηp2=0.267)和摆动面积(F(2,27)=9.624,p=0.001,ηp2=0.416)存在显著的干预与时间交互作用。在 EO 条件下,右侧半球的 C-tDCS 显著增加了 SPL(p<0.01,d=0.51)、ML-SPL(p<0.01,d=0.52)和摆动面积(p<0.05,d=0.83)。相比之下,左侧半球的 C-tDCS 在 EC 和 EO 条件下均显著增加了 L/A(EO;p<0.05,d=0.67,EC;p<0.05,d=0.57)。
这些结果表明,右侧顶叶区域主要通过视觉信息处理在 EO 条件下对静态站立平衡做出贡献。另一方面,在 EO 和 EC 条件下,通过左顶叶区域的 tDCS 增加 L/A,更多地依赖于体感信息来维持 EC 条件下的静态站立平衡。