Aman N, Pandurangi Swapna A, Kulkarni Pratibha R, Kulkarni Ranganath R
Department of Psychiatry, Dharwad Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Department of Forensic Medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;67(4):382-390. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_977_24. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
Capacity is a dynamic, task-specific, time-specific clinical construct that may be impaired either temporarily or permanently due to the medical or psychiatric illness, necessitating varying degrees of support from caregivers. There is paucity of Indian prospective studies focusing on the mental capacity, insight, and severity of illness (SOI) in psychiatric in-patients.
The current study aimed to prospectively examine the capacity, insight, and SOI in psychiatric in-patients in a tertiary level psychiatric center.
A prospective observational study design was used to assess patient's capacity for making mental healthcare and treatment decisions, insight and SOI using the guidance document, clinical grading of insight and brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), respectively. In-patients aged 18 years and above, any gender and any psychiatric diagnosis as per ICD-11 diagnostic criteria were included, and intellectual developmental disorder was excluded. All assessments were conducted at the time of admission (baseline) and repeated every week until discharge.
Of 233 in-patients studied, 75% ( = 175) had incapacity and 80% ( = 187) had absent insight at the baseline. Incapacity at baseline was noted in those with delirium, catatonia, BPRS >31 (88%), absent insight (92.6%), and psychotic symptoms (94%). Only 6.42% ( = 12) of cases with the absent insight at baseline had preserved capacity. On repeated measures analysis, those with substance use disorders (SUDs; ≤1 week) and mood disorders regained capacity earlier (1-3 weeks) than psychotic disorders (>3 weeks; < 0.001).
Insight appears to be the best discriminator for capacity status for psychotic disorders, bipolar disorders, and SUDs. Presence of delirium, catatonia, and intoxication reflect obvious lack of capacity; while absent insight, BPRS >31, psychotic and bipolar disorders suggest significant association with incapacity. Effective treatment improves capacity and insight earlier in persons with SUDs and bipolar disorders than psychotic disorders.
行为能力是一种动态的、特定任务、特定时间的临床概念,可能由于医学或精神疾病而暂时或永久受损,这就需要照顾者给予不同程度的支持。印度针对精神科住院患者的心理行为能力、自知力和疾病严重程度(SOI)的前瞻性研究较少。
本研究旨在前瞻性地考察三级精神科中心精神科住院患者的行为能力、自知力和SOI。
采用前瞻性观察性研究设计,分别使用指导文件、自知力临床分级和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评估患者做出精神卫生保健和治疗决策的能力、自知力和SOI。纳入年龄18岁及以上、任何性别、符合ICD - 11诊断标准的任何精神疾病诊断的住院患者,排除智力发育障碍患者。所有评估均在入院时(基线)进行,并每周重复一次直至出院。
在研究的233名住院患者中,75%(n = 175)在基线时无行为能力,80%(n = 187)在基线时无自知力。谵妄、紧张症、BPRS>31(88%)、无自知力(92.6%)和精神病性症状(94%)的患者在基线时无行为能力。基线时无自知力的病例中只有6.42%(n = 12)保留了行为能力。在重复测量分析中,物质使用障碍(SUDs;≤1周)和心境障碍患者比精神障碍患者更早(1 - 3周)恢复行为能力(>3周;P < 0.001)。
自知力似乎是精神障碍、双相情感障碍和物质使用障碍患者行为能力状态的最佳判别指标。谵妄、紧张症和中毒的存在反映出明显的行为能力缺乏;而无自知力、BPRS>31、精神病性和双相情感障碍提示与无行为能力有显著关联。有效的治疗使物质使用障碍和双相情感障碍患者比精神障碍患者更早改善行为能力和自知力。