• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮左心室辅助装置支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中平均血压曲线的影响:PROTECT III研究

Impact of Mean Blood Pressure Profiles in Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROTECT III Study.

作者信息

Bonnet Guillaume, Rommel Karl-Philipp, Falah Batla, Lansky Alexandra J, Zhang Yiran, Schonning Michael J, Redfors Björn, Burkhoff Daniel, Cohen David J, Basir M Babar, O'Neill William W, Granada Juan F

机构信息

Cardiovacular Research Foundation New York NY USA.

Medico-Surgical Department Hopital Cardiologique Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux University Hospital Bordeaux France.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e036367. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036367. Epub 2025 May 15.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036367
PMID:40371603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12184586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are used prophylactically to prevent hypotension during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the impact of preprocedural hemodynamic profiles on procedural and clinical outcomes in these patients is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients from the central venous access device PROTECT III registry (NCT04136392) were categorized according to preprocedural mean blood pressure (MBP). Procedural and in-hospital outcomes, including hypotensive episodes, need for prolonged percutaneous left ventricular assist device support, and in-hospital death, were compared between groups. We also assessed the relationship between preprocedural MBP and 90-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, which included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and repeat revascularization, as well as with 1-year mortality. A total of 1159 patients underwent percutaneous left ventricular assist device-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and were stratified into 4 hemodynamic profiles of preprocedural MBP level: MBP>100 mm Hg (n=242), >90 to ≤100 mm Hg (n=264), >80 to ≤90 mm Hg (n=306), and ≤80 mm Hg (n=347). Lower preprocedural MBP was associated with baseline anemia, history of heart failure, left main disease, and transfer from another hospital. In-hospital and procedural adverse outcomes did not differ between the BP categories. However, 90-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events rates and 1-year mortality increased with decreasing baseline BP levels. The association between BP category and 1-year mortality remained significant after adjustment for other factors (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.71-0.88], <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world cohort undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with percutaneous left ventricular assist device support, there was no association between hemodynamic status and in-hospital outcomes. Lower preprocedural BP was associated with higher rates of 90-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and 1-year mortality.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04136392.

摘要

背景

经皮左心室辅助装置用于预防性地防止高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的低血压。然而,术前血流动力学参数对这些患者的手术及临床结局的影响尚不清楚。

方法与结果

来自中心静脉通路装置PROTECT III注册研究(NCT04136392)的患者根据术前平均血压(MBP)进行分类。比较各组之间的手术及院内结局,包括低血压发作、延长经皮左心室辅助装置支持的需求以及院内死亡。我们还评估了术前MBP与90天主要不良心血管和脑血管事件之间的关系,90天主要不良心血管和脑血管事件包括全因死亡、心肌梗死、中风/短暂性脑缺血发作和再次血运重建,以及与1年死亡率的关系。共有1159例患者接受了经皮左心室辅助装置支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并根据术前MBP水平分为4种血流动力学参数类型:MBP>100 mmHg(n = 242)、>90至≤100 mmHg(n = 264)、>80至≤90 mmHg(n = 306)和≤80 mmHg(n = 347)。术前较低的MBP与基线贫血、心力衰竭病史、左主干病变以及从另一家医院转诊有关。不同血压类别之间的院内和手术不良结局无差异。然而,90天主要不良心血管和脑血管事件发生率及1年死亡率随基线血压水平降低而增加。在对其他因素进行调整后,血压类别与1年死亡率之间的关联仍然显著(风险比[HR],0.79[95%CI,0.71 - 0.88],<0.001)。

结论

在接受经皮左心室辅助装置支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的真实世界队列中,血流动力学状态与院内结局之间无关联。术前较低的血压与90天主要不良心血管和脑血管事件发生率及1年死亡率较高有关。

注册信息

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04136392。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/9e3dae2fa659/JAH3-14-e036367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/c3c6f830c8ab/JAH3-14-e036367-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/034dee237f40/JAH3-14-e036367-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/9e3dae2fa659/JAH3-14-e036367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/c3c6f830c8ab/JAH3-14-e036367-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/034dee237f40/JAH3-14-e036367-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d4/12184586/9e3dae2fa659/JAH3-14-e036367-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Mean Blood Pressure Profiles in Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROTECT III Study.经皮左心室辅助装置支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中平均血压曲线的影响:PROTECT III研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e036367. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036367. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.接受使用Impella进行的保护性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的特征与结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038509. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
4
Beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后无心力衰竭的患者使用β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):CD012565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012565.pub2.
5
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
6
Stepwise Provisional Versus Systematic Dual-Stent Strategies for Treatment of True Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.治疗真性左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的逐步临时与系统性双支架策略
Circulation. 2025 Mar 4;151(9):612-622. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071153. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Evaluation of the ventricular assist device programme in the UK.英国心室辅助装置项目评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(48):1-119, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10480.
8
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension.肾素抑制剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;4(4):CD007066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub3.
9
DK-Crush or Mini-Crush Stenting for Complex Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The Multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM Registry.DK挤压式或迷你挤压式支架置入术治疗复杂左主干分叉病变:多中心EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM注册研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):e040166. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040166. Epub 2025 May 21.
10
Smoking cessation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.戒烟对心血管疾病二级预防的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 8;8(8):CD014936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014936.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex Differences in pLVAD-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROTECT III Study.左心室辅助装置支持下的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的性别差异:来自PROTECT III研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1721-1729. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.04.036. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology.经皮跨瓣微轴流泵支持在心脏病学中的应用。
Circulation. 2022 Apr 19;145(16):1254-1284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
Improved outcomes in patients with severely depressed LVEF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary practices.
采用当代治疗方法对左心室射血分数严重降低的患者进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可改善预后。
Am Heart J. 2022 Jun;248:139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
4
Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016.定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复杂性和风险:对英国 BCIS 数据库 2006-2016 年的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.039.
5
Feasibility and Safety of High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without Mechanical Circulatory Support.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无机械循环支持的可行性和安全性。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun;14(6):e009960. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009960. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中机械循环支持患者中 Impella 使用的演变情况。
Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):273-284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
7
Observational multicentre registry of patients treated with IMPella mechanical circulatory support device in ITaly: the IMP-IT registry.意大利应用 Impella 机械循环支持装置治疗患者的观察性多中心注册研究:IMP-IT 注册研究。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Feb 7;15(15):e1343-e1350. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00428.
8
Impact of Pre-Procedural Blood Pressure on Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术前血压对长期预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 11;73(22):2846-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.493.
9
The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure.cVAD 经皮临时血液动力学支持登记处:在高危 PCI、心源性休克和心力衰竭失代偿中使用 Impella 机械循环支持的前瞻性登记处。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Relationship Between Mean Blood Pressure at Admission and In-Hospital Outcome After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后入院时平均血压与院内结局的关系
Int Heart J. 2016 Sep 28;57(5):547-52. doi: 10.1536/ihj.15-480. Epub 2016 Aug 16.