Qian Li, Wang Jinghan, Shi Yajuan, Lu Yonglong, Liang Ruoyu, Xu Qiuyun, Zhou Xuan, Li Xuan, Shao Xiuqing
State Key Laboratory for Ecological Security of Regions and Cities, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
State Key Laboratory for Ecological Security of Regions and Cities, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2025 Aug 15;494:138563. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138563. Epub 2025 May 9.
Widespread soil heavy metal (HM) pollution has caused great concerns worldwide. A refined and cost-effective ecological risk assessment (ERA) is critical for managing these risks. Herein, we propose a novel tiered ERA framework to evaluate indigenous pollution-effect associations in contaminated soils. This framework progressively applies source apportionment, spatial regression, deterministic and probabilistic risk characterization, ecological surveys of soil phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs), and successive multivariable statistics to provide comprehensive ERA evidence, as demonstrated in an ecologically fragile mining area. The risk screening phase identified Zn, Pb, Cd, Cu, and Hg as priority contaminants, and mining activities contributed 86.5 % (Zn), 87.2 % (Pb), 83.3 % (Cd), 64.6 % (Cu), and 52.3 % (Hg) of the total soil concentrations in the study area determined by the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The risk quotient of ecological criteria tailored to different land uses exhibited ecologically relevant risk grading. The risk quantification phase determined the overall risk probabilities to be 53.98 %, 11.12 %, 9.69 %, 5.03 % and 1.34 % for Zn, Pb, Cu, Cd and Hg, respectively, and provided adaptive HM priority lists with different risk grades. The risk causeeffect attribution phase confirmed that HMs significantly reduced soil fungal PLFA abundance and indirectly altered the PLFA structure by decreasing the soil pH. The proposed framework offers a cost-effective, refined and feasible technical support for ecological risk management in contaminated areas.
广泛的土壤重金属污染已引起全球广泛关注。一种精细且具有成本效益的生态风险评估对于管理这些风险至关重要。在此,我们提出了一种新颖的分层生态风险评估框架,以评估污染土壤中本地污染 - 效应关联。该框架逐步应用源解析、空间回归、确定性和概率性风险表征、土壤磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)的生态调查以及连续多变量统计,以提供全面的生态风险评估证据,这在一个生态脆弱的矿区得到了验证。风险筛选阶段确定锌、铅、镉、铜和汞为优先污染物,通过正矩阵因子分解(PMF)模型确定,采矿活动分别占研究区域土壤总浓度的86.5%(锌)、87.2%(铅)、83.3%(镉)、64.6%(铜)和52.3%(汞)。针对不同土地利用定制的生态标准风险商数呈现出与生态相关的风险分级。风险量化阶段确定锌、铅、铜、镉和汞的总体风险概率分别为53.98%、11.12%、9.69%、5.03%和1.34%,并提供了具有不同风险等级的适应性重金属优先清单。风险因果归因阶段证实,重金属显著降低了土壤真菌PLFA丰度,并通过降低土壤pH值间接改变了PLFA结构。所提出的框架为污染区域的生态风险管理提供了一种具有成本效益、精细且可行的技术支持。