Piva de Freitas Paola, Freire de Castro Rafael, de Morais E Oliveira Ana Paula, Takahiro Chone Carlos, Menino Castilho Arthur
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Faculdade de Medicina Ciências (FCM), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Faculdade de Medicina Ciências (FCM), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 14;91(5):101628. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101628.
Children with Single-Sided Deafness (SSD) may experience a range of developmental challenges. While cochlear implantation has demonstrated significant improvements in hearing, its impact on Quality of Life (QoL) remains underreported. This review evaluates how cochlear implantation for SSD influences the quality of life in children.
A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines across nine different databases, without language restrictions, including articles indexed up to December 15, 2023. Eligible studies included patients up to 18-years-old; severe to profound unilateral hearing loss, and normal contralateral hearing; cochlear implantation with more than 3 months of follow-up; QoL assessed by structured questionnaires. Meta-analysis compared QoL scores obtained between pre- and post-operative periods for time of onset or hearing loss (congenital vs. post-lingual), evaluated by parents and children, and the effective cochlear implant usage time.
A total of 296 articles were identified, with 6 eligible for qualitative analysis and 3 for meta-analysis, involving 187 patients. The mean age at implantation was 5.8 years, with an average auditory deprivation time of 3.8 years. Both the congenital and post-lingual groups demonstrated improvement in QoL, with a mean increase of 1.51 points in children's evaluations (p-value < 0.001) and 2.70 points in parental perspectives (p-value < 0.001), assessed on a 10-point scale. The estimated effective device use time was 8.8 h per day, with 8.55 h per day for the congenital group and 10.37 h per day for the post-lingual group. There was no statistically significant difference in usage time between the two groups (p-value = 0.140).
The results indicated a significant improvement in QoL, as reported by both parents and through self-assessment. The treatment also demonstrated high levels of adherence. Both congenital and post-lingual groups yielded similar outcomes in terms of QoL and device usage time.
单侧耳聋(SSD)儿童可能会面临一系列发育挑战。虽然人工耳蜗植入已显示出听力方面的显著改善,但其对生活质量(QoL)的影响仍鲜有报道。本综述评估了SSD人工耳蜗植入对儿童生活质量的影响。
按照PRISMA指南,在九个不同数据库中进行了系统综述,无语言限制,包括截至2023年12月15日索引的文章。符合条件的研究包括18岁以下患者;重度至极重度单侧听力损失,对侧听力正常;人工耳蜗植入且随访超过3个月;通过结构化问卷评估生活质量。荟萃分析比较了术前和术后不同发病时间或听力损失情况(先天性与语言后性)的生活质量得分,由父母和儿童进行评估,以及人工耳蜗的有效使用时间。
共识别出296篇文章,其中6篇符合定性分析,3篇符合荟萃分析,涉及187名患者。植入时的平均年龄为5.8岁,平均听觉剥夺时间为3.8年。先天性和语言后性组的生活质量均有改善,在10分制量表上,儿童评估的平均得分增加1.51分(p值<0.001),父母评估的平均得分增加2.70分(p值<0.001)。估计的有效设备使用时间为每天8.8小时,先天性组为每天8.55小时,语言后性组为每天10.37小时。两组之间的使用时间无统计学显著差异(p值=0.140)。
结果表明,父母报告和自我评估均显示生活质量有显著改善。该治疗方法也显示出较高的依从性。先天性和语言后性组在生活质量和设备使用时间方面产生了相似的结果。