Seeberg Alberte B, Matthews Tomas E, Højlund Andreas, Vuust Peter, Petersen Bjørn
Center for Music in the Brain, dpt. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cognition. 2025 Sep;262:106178. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106178. Epub 2025 May 14.
People experience the strongest pleasurable urge to move to music (PLUMM) with rhythms of medium complexity, showing an inverted U-shaped relationship. Rhythmic complexity is typically defined by syncopation but likely interacts with the number and instrumentation of rhythmic layers (e.g., snare only vs snare and bass drum) in affecting PLUMM. This study investigated this interaction by comparing PLUMM ratings of rhythms with varying rhythmic layers and syncopation degrees. Two online studies (study 1, n = 108; study 2, n = 46) were conducted asking participants to rate how much they wanted to move and the pleasure they felt while listening to rhythms. Each study used 12 rhythms in four versions: 1) snare only (SN) in study I and bass drum only (BD) in study II; 2) snare and hi-hat (SN + HH) in study I and bass drum and hi-hat (BD + HH) in study II; 3) snare and bass drum (SN + BD) and 4) the original with snare, bass drum, and hi-hat (SN + BD + HH) in both studies, totaling 48 stimuli per study. We tested for linear and quadratic effects of syncopation and rhythmic layers on PLUMM ratings. Study I showed a significant interaction between syncopation and rhythmic layers. The SN + BD + HH versions exhibited the strongest inverted U as an effect of syncopation, followed by SN + BD and SN + HH, while SN showed a near-flat pattern of ratings as an effect of syncopation. Study II had similar findings, but differences between versions were smaller, and the interaction was mainly driven by differences between BD and BD + HH and between SN + BD and SN + BD + HH, especially at moderate syncopation levels. These findings suggest that the PLUMM response is shaped by the number of rhythmic layers, the roles that the different instruments play, and the way that they interact with each other and with syncopation, thus extending our understanding of the rhythmic features that drive the motor and hedonic responses to music.
人们在听到中等复杂程度节奏的音乐时,会体验到最强烈的随着音乐起舞的愉悦冲动(PLUMM),呈现出倒U形关系。节奏复杂性通常由切分音定义,但在影响PLUMM方面,它可能与节奏层的数量和乐器编制(如仅小军鼓与小军鼓和低音鼓)相互作用。本研究通过比较具有不同节奏层和切分音程度的节奏的PLUMM评分,来探究这种相互作用。进行了两项在线研究(研究1,n = 108;研究2,n = 46),要求参与者对他们在听节奏时想要舞动的程度以及感受到的愉悦程度进行评分。每项研究使用了12种节奏的四个版本:1)研究I中的仅小军鼓(SN)和研究II中的仅低音鼓(BD);2)研究I中的小军鼓和踩镲(SN + HH)以及研究II中的低音鼓和踩镲(BD + HH);3)小军鼓和低音鼓(SN + BD);4)两项研究中均有的带有小军鼓、低音鼓和踩镲的原始版本(SN + BD + HH),每项研究共48种刺激。我们测试了切分音和节奏层对PLUMM评分的线性和二次效应。研究I显示切分音和节奏层之间存在显著的相互作用。SN + BD + HH版本作为切分音的效应呈现出最强的倒U形,其次是SN + BD和SN + HH,而SN作为切分音的效应显示出近乎平坦的评分模式。研究II有类似的发现,但版本之间的差异较小,且这种相互作用主要由BD与BD + HH之间以及SN + BD与SN + BD + HH之间的差异驱动,尤其是在中等切分音水平上。这些发现表明,PLUMM反应是由节奏层的数量、不同乐器所起的作用以及它们彼此之间以及与切分音相互作用的方式所塑造的,从而扩展了我们对驱动对音乐的运动和享乐反应的节奏特征的理解。