School of Music, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 29;13(6):e0199604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199604. eCollection 2018.
Music psychology defines groove as humans' pleasureable urge to move their body in synchrony with music. Past research has found that rhythmic syncopation, event density, beat salience, and rhythmic variability are positively associated with groove. This exploratory study investigates the groove effect of 248 reconstructed drum patterns from different popular music styles (pop, rock, funk, heavy metal, rock'n'roll, hip hop, soul, R&B). It aims at identifying factors that might be relevant for groove and worth investigating in a controlled setting in the future. Drum patterns of eight bars duration, chosen from 248 popular music tracks, have been transcribed and audio reconstructions have been created on the basis of sound samples. During an online listening experiment, 665 participants rated the reconstructions a total of 8,329 times using a groove questionnaire. Results show that, among 15 tested variables, syncopation (R2 = 0.010) and event density (R2 = 0.011) were positively associated with the groove ratings. These effects were stronger in participants who were music professionals, compared to amateur musicians or mere listeners. A categorisation of the stimuli according to structural aspects was also associated with groove (R2 = 0.018). Beat salience, residual microtiming and rhythmic variability showed no effect on the groove ratings. Participants' familiarity with a drum pattern had a positive influence on the groove ratings (η2 = 0.051). The largest isolated effect was measured for participants' style bias (R2 = 0.123): groove ratings tended to be high if participants had the impression that the drum pattern belonged to a style they liked. Combined, the effects of style bias and familiarity (R2 = 0.152) exceeded the other effects as predictors for groove by a wide margin. We conclude that listeners' taste, musical biographies and expertise have a strong effect on their groove experience. This motivates groove research not to focus on the music alone, but to take the listeners into account as well.
音乐心理学将groove 定义为人类愉悦地用身体随音乐同步运动的冲动。过去的研究发现,节奏切分、事件密度、节拍突出度和节奏可变性与 groove 呈正相关。这项探索性研究调查了来自不同流行音乐风格(流行、摇滚、放克、重金属、摇滚、嘻哈、灵魂、R&B)的 248 个重构鼓模式的 groove 效应。它旨在确定可能与 groove 相关且在未来值得在受控环境中进行研究的因素。从 248 首流行音乐曲目中选择的 8 小节时长的鼓模式已被转录,并根据声音样本创建了音频重建。在在线听力实验中,665 名参与者使用 groove 问卷对重建总共进行了 8329 次评分。结果表明,在 15 个测试变量中,切分(R2=0.010)和事件密度(R2=0.011)与 groove 评分呈正相关。与业余音乐家或普通听众相比,音乐专业人士的这些影响更强。根据结构方面对刺激进行分类也与 groove 相关(R2=0.018)。节拍突出度、剩余微节奏和节奏可变性对 groove 评分没有影响。参与者对鼓模式的熟悉程度对 groove 评分有积极影响(η2=0.051)。最大的孤立效应是参与者的风格偏好(R2=0.123):如果参与者认为鼓模式属于他们喜欢的风格,那么 groove 评分往往会很高。综合来看,风格偏好和熟悉度的影响(R2=0.152)远远超过其他因素作为 groove 的预测因素。我们得出的结论是,听众的品味、音乐传记和专业知识对他们的 groove 体验有很大影响。这促使 groove 研究不仅要关注音乐本身,还要考虑听众。