Nagasaki Kazuya, Nishizaki Yuji, Shimizu Taro, Yamamoto Yu, Shikino Kiyoshi, Kataoka Koshi, Kobayashi Hiroyuki, Tokuda Yasuharu
Department of Internal Medicine, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Division of Medical Education, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 15;15(1):16925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00347-1.
Japan's workplace reforms, including a 60-hour weekly work limit for medical residents, that has been in effect from April 2024, have raised concerns about compliance and its impact on training quality. This study analyzed data from 17,967 residents who participated in the General Medicine In-Training Examination from 2019 to 2022, focusing on weekly duty hours, clinical responsibilities, and training environments. Duty hours increased from 2019 to 2021, before declining in 2022. The proportion of residents working over 60 h per week decreased from 57 to 49%, while those working under 50 h increased from 12 to 19%. Concurrently, the percentage of residents managing zero to four inpatients rose from 18 to 39%. University hospital residents reported shorter duty hours but fewer patient encounters and diminished clinical exposure compared to community hospital residents. These findings underscore the educational consequences of duty-hour restrictions, particularly in university hospitals, where reduced clinical responsibilities may compromise competency-based training. The results highlight the need for balanced policies that ensure compliance while maintaining sufficient clinical exposure. Future reforms should prioritize equitable workload distribution, increased clinical opportunities, and targeted interventions to address disparities between hospital types, thereby ensuring the dual goals of resident well-being and high-quality medical education.
日本的职场改革,包括自2024年4月起对住院医师实施每周60小时的工作时长限制,引发了人们对合规性及其对培训质量影响的担忧。本研究分析了2019年至2022年期间参加普通内科住院医师培训考试的17967名住院医师的数据,重点关注每周工作时长、临床职责和培训环境。工作时长在2019年至2021年期间增加,之后在2022年下降。每周工作超过60小时的住院医师比例从57%降至49%,而每周工作少于50小时的住院医师比例从12%增至19%。与此同时,负责管理0至4名住院患者的住院医师比例从18%升至39%。与社区医院的住院医师相比,大学医院的住院医师报告的工作时长较短,但患者接触机会较少,临床接触也较少。这些发现强调了工作时长限制的教育后果,尤其是在大学医院,临床职责的减少可能会损害基于能力的培训。结果凸显了制定平衡政策的必要性,这些政策既要确保合规,又要保持足够的临床接触。未来的改革应优先考虑公平的工作量分配、增加临床机会以及针对性干预措施,以解决不同类型医院之间的差异,从而确保住院医师福祉和高质量医学教育这两个双重目标的实现。