Fasmer Kristine E, Sæterstøl Jostein, Ljunggren Maria B S, Brun Astrid M K, Pijnenborg Johanna M A, Woie Kathrine, Krakstad Camilla, Haldorsen Ingfrid S
Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Section for Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 15;25(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14155-3.
The objective of this study is to quantify abdominal obesity markers from computed tomography (CT) scans at primary diagnosis and follow-up in a large endometrial cancer cohort, and to assess temporal change in obesity markers in relation to surgicopathological patient characteristics and outcome.
Total- (TAV), subcutaneous- (SAV), visceral (VAV) abdominal fat volumes, and visceral-to-total fat percentage (VAV%) were derived from CT scans acquired in an endometrial cancer patient cohort at primary diagnosis (n=293). Temporal (delta, δ) changes in CT obesity markers from primary diagnosis to follow-up were assessed for all patients with a follow-up CT 13 (7, 19) [median (interquartile range)] months after diagnosis (n=152/293 patients). The CT obesity markers were assessed in relation to clinicopathological features and progression-free survival (PFS) using Mann-Whitney U-test, and Cox hazard ratios (HRs), respectively.
At primary diagnosis, VAV% was the only marker significantly associated with high-risk histology (median of 33% for endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) grade 1-2, 36% for EEC grade 3 and 36% for non-endometrioid EC, p = 0.003), myometrial invasion (MI) (median of 34% for MI < 50% vs. 35% for MI ≥ 50%, p = 0.03) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (median of 34% for no LVSI vs. 36% for LVSI, p = 0.009). High VAV% (≥ 35%) also predicted poor PFS both in univariable analysis (HR = 1.8, p = 0.02), and when stratified for surgicopathological FIGO stage (HR = 3.1, p = 0.03). At follow-up, median TAV, VAV, SAV, and VAV% were significantly lower than at primary diagnosis (p < 0.001 for all). Furthermore, patients with progression had larger reductions in visceral fat compartments (δVAV=-24%, δVAV% =-3%), than patients with no progression (δVAV=-17%, δVAV%=-2%, p ≤ 0.006 for both).
Visceral abdominal obesity (high VAV%) is associated with high-risk histologic features, myometrial invasion, and poor prognosis. Furthermore, high visceral fat loss during/following therapy is associated with disease progression.
本研究的目的是在一个大型子宫内膜癌队列中,对初次诊断及随访时计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中的腹部肥胖标志物进行量化,并评估肥胖标志物随时间的变化与患者手术病理特征及预后的关系。
从子宫内膜癌患者队列初次诊断时(n = 293)获取的CT图像中得出腹部总脂肪体积(TAV)、皮下脂肪体积(SAV)、内脏脂肪体积(VAV)以及内脏脂肪与总脂肪百分比(VAV%)。对所有在诊断后13(7,19)[中位数(四分位间距)]个月进行随访CT检查的患者(n = 152/293例患者),评估从初次诊断到随访期间CT肥胖标志物的时间变化(差值,δ)。分别使用Mann-Whitney U检验以及Cox风险比(HR),将CT肥胖标志物与临床病理特征及无进展生存期(PFS)进行评估。
在初次诊断时,VAV%是唯一与高危组织学显著相关的标志物(子宫内膜样腺癌(EEC)1 - 2级中位数为33%,EEC 3级为36%,非子宫内膜样EC为36%,p = 0.003)、肌层浸润(MI)(MI < 50%时中位数为34%,MI≥50%时为35%,p = 0.03)以及淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)(无LVSI时中位数为34%,有LVSI时为36%,p = 0.009)。高VAV%(≥35%)在单因素分析中(HR = 1.8,p = 0.02)以及按手术病理国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期分层时(HR = 3.1,p = 0.03)均预示着PFS较差。在随访时,TAV、VAV、SAV及VAV%的中位数均显著低于初次诊断时(所有p < 0.001)。此外,病情进展的患者内脏脂肪区的减少幅度更大(δVAV = -24%,δVAV% = -3%),高于无进展的患者(δVAV = -17%,δVAV% = -2%,两者p≤0.006)。
内脏型腹部肥胖(高VAV%)与高危组织学特征、肌层浸润及预后不良相关。此外,治疗期间/治疗后内脏脂肪大量减少与疾病进展相关。