Suppr超能文献

血流限制抗阻运动与神经肌肉运动对慢性膝骨关节炎成人机械性肌肉功能的影响——一项随机对照试验的二次分析

Effects of Blood-Flow Restricted Resistance Exercise Versus Neuromuscular Exercise on Mechanical Muscle Function in Adults With Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis-A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Sørensen Brian, Magnusson S Peter, Svensson Rene B, Hjortshoej Mikkel H, Hansen Sofie K, Suetta Charlotte, Couppé Christian, Johannsen Finn E, Aagaard Per

机构信息

Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025 May;35(5):e70069. doi: 10.1111/sms.70069.

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (knee OA) is a prevalent condition worldwide. Globally recognized rehabilitation guidelines for knee OA include patient education and neuromuscular exercises (NEMEX). While heavy-load resistance exercise (70%-90% 1RM) often induces pain with knee OA, low-load exercise (20%-40% 1RM) combined with partial blood-flow restriction (BFR-RE) has been introduced without inducing excessive knee joint pain. The present study aimed to compare the effects of NEMEX and BFR-RE on mechanical muscle function in knee OA individuals. Ninety-six participants (age 56.7 ± 7.6; 47 males, 49 females) with symptomatic, radiographic knee OA were randomized to free-flow land-based NEMEX or unilateral machine-based BFR-RE. Both groups exercised biweekly for 12 weeks while also receiving patient education. Outcomes measured from baseline to 12 weeks included maximal isometric knee extensor strength (MVIC), rate of force development (RFD), maximal leg extensor power (LEP), and cross-sectional area (mCSA) of rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL). Significant (p < 0.01) within-group improvements from baseline to 12 weeks were observed in both groups for MVIC (BFR-RE: +0.4 vs. NEMEX: +0.1 Nm/kg), LEP (+0.6 vs. +0.2 W/kg), mCSA for RF (+1.8 vs. +0.6 cm), and VL (+3.7 vs. +1.0 cm). BFR-RE led to increases in RFD (+2.11 (50-ms), +4.48 (200-ms) Nm/s/kg) (p < 0.01), whereas NEMEX did not (p > 0.05). Between-group comparisons revealed greater improvements with BFR-RE for all outcomes (p < 0.01). BFR-RE appears superior to NEMEX in enhancing mechanical muscle function and knee extensor mCSA in knee OA individuals. The enhanced physiological responses observed with BFR-RE suggest that this exercise modality should be considered as an adjunct therapeutic tool in future treatment protocols for knee OA patients.

摘要

膝关节骨关节炎(膝骨关节炎)在全球范围内都很普遍。全球公认的膝骨关节炎康复指南包括患者教育和神经肌肉锻炼(NEMEX)。虽然重负荷抗阻运动(70%-90% 1RM)常引发膝骨关节炎患者疼痛,但低负荷运动(20%-40% 1RM)结合局部血流限制(BFR-RE)已被采用且不会引发过度的膝关节疼痛。本研究旨在比较NEMEX和BFR-RE对膝骨关节炎患者肌肉力学功能的影响。96名有症状、经影像学检查确诊的膝骨关节炎参与者(年龄56.7±7.6岁;47名男性,49名女性)被随机分为自由流动陆地NEMEX组或单侧器械BFR-RE组。两组均每两周锻炼一次,共12周,同时接受患者教育。从基线到12周测量的结果包括最大等长膝关节伸肌力量(MVIC)、力量发展速率(RFD)、最大腿部伸肌功率(LEP)以及股直肌(RF)和股外侧肌(VL)的横截面积(mCSA)。两组从基线到12周均观察到MVIC(BFR-RE组:增加0.4 vs. NEMEX组:增加0.1 Nm/kg)、LEP(增加0.6 vs.增加0.2 W/kg)、RF的mCSA(增加1.8 vs.增加0.6 cm)和VL的mCSA(增加3.7 vs.增加1.0 cm)有显著(p<0.01)的组内改善。BFR-RE导致RFD增加(+2.11(50毫秒),+4.48(200毫秒)Nm/s/kg)(p<0.01),而NEMEX组未增加(p>0.05)。组间比较显示,BFR-RE在所有结果上的改善更大(p<0.01)。在增强膝骨关节炎患者的肌肉力学功能和膝关节伸肌mCSA方面,BFR-RE似乎优于NEMEX。BFR-RE观察到的增强生理反应表明,这种运动方式应被视为未来膝骨关节炎患者治疗方案中的辅助治疗工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7c3/12081943/99deef00a36c/SMS-35-e70069-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验