Brust Christina A, Swanson Matthew A, Iliopoulos Tsoutsouvas Christos, Dimova Snezana T, Dang Vuong Q, Stahl Edward L, Ho Jo-Hao, Nikas Spyros P, Makriyannis Alexandros, Bohn Laura M
The Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation and Technology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
The Skaggs Graduate School of Chemical and Biological Sciences at Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Receptors (Basel). 2024 Sep;3(3):380-396. doi: 10.3390/receptors3030018. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Human endocannabinoid signaling is primarily mediated by the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These receptors have been linked to a variety of physiological processes and are being pursued as prospective drug targets due to their potential in treating pain and inflammation. However, because of their homology and shared signaling mechanisms, investigating the individual physiological roles of these receptors and designing subtype-selective ligands has been challenging. Using active-state CB1 and CB2 structures as guides, homologous residues within the orthosteric pocket of each receptor were mutated to alanine to test whether they equally impair CB1 and CB2 activity in response to two high-affinity, nonselective agonists (CP55,940 and AM12033). Interestingly, mutating the Y5.39 position impairs CB1 but not CB2 function. Conversely, mutating residue C6.47 improves CB1 but impairs CB2 signaling. TheF7.35A mutation leads to a decrease in CP55,940 potency at CB1 and impairs internalization; however, AM12033 gains potency and promotes CB1 internalization. In CB2, mutation of F7.35A decreases the potency of CP55,940 and neither agonist induces internalization. These observations provide some insight into functional sensitivity of CB1 and CB2 to different agonists when conserved residues are mutated in the orthosteric pocket.
人类内源性大麻素信号传导主要由大麻素受体CB1和CB2介导,它们是G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)。这些受体与多种生理过程相关,因其在治疗疼痛和炎症方面的潜力而被视为潜在的药物靶点。然而,由于它们的同源性和共享的信号传导机制,研究这些受体的个体生理作用以及设计亚型选择性配体一直具有挑战性。以活性状态的CB1和CB2结构为指导,将每个受体正构口袋内的同源残基突变为丙氨酸,以测试它们对两种高亲和力、非选择性激动剂(CP55,940和AM12033)的反应是否同样损害CB1和CB2的活性。有趣的是,突变Y5.39位置会损害CB1的功能,但不会损害CB2的功能。相反,突变残基C6.47会增强CB1的信号传导,但会损害CB2的信号传导。F7.35A突变导致CP55,940对CB1的效力降低,并损害内化;然而,AM12033的效力增加并促进CB1的内化。在CB2中,F7.35A突变降低了CP55,940的效力,且两种激动剂均不诱导内化。这些观察结果为当正构口袋中的保守残基发生突变时,CB1和CB2对不同激动剂的功能敏感性提供了一些见解。