Ashton John C, Wright Jason L, McPartland John M, Tyndall Joel D A
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(14):1428-43. doi: 10.2174/092986708784567716.
Cannabinoids in current use such as nabilone activate both CB1 and CB2 receptors. Selective CB2 activation may provide some of the therapeutic effects of cannabinoids, such as their immuno-modulatory properties, without the psychoactive effects of CB1 activation. Therefore, cannabinoid CB2 receptors represent an attractive target for drug development. However, selective and potent CB2 agonists remain in development. CB1 and CB2 differ considerably in their amino acid sequence and tertiary structures. Therefore, clinical development of potent and selective CB2 agonists is probable. Mutational and ligand binding studies, functional mapping, and computer modelling have revealed key residues and domains in cannabinoid receptors that are involved in agonist and antagonist binding to CB1 and CB2. In addition, CB2 has undergone more rapid evolution, and results for ligand binding and efficacy cannot be automatically extrapolated from rat or mouse CB2 to human. Furthermore, loss of CB1 affinity is a crucial property for CB2-selective ligands, and although rat CB1 is 97% homologous with human CB1, critical differences do exist, with potential for further exploitation in drug design. In this paper we briefly review previous cannabinoid receptor models and mutation/binding studies. We also review binding affinity ratios with respect to CB1 and CB2. We then employ our own models to illustrate key cannabinoid receptor residues and binding subdomains that are involved in these differences in binding affinities and discuss how these might be exploited in the development of CB2 specific ligands. Published reports for species specific binding affinities for CB2 are scarce, and we argue that this needs to be corrected prior to the progression of CB2 agonists from pre-clinical to clinical research.
目前使用的大麻素,如那必隆,可激活CB1和CB2受体。选择性激活CB2可能会产生大麻素的一些治疗效果,如免疫调节特性,而不会产生CB1激活所带来的精神活性作用。因此,大麻素CB2受体是药物开发的一个有吸引力的靶点。然而,选择性和强效的CB2激动剂仍在研发中。CB1和CB2在氨基酸序列和三级结构上有很大差异。因此,强效和选择性CB2激动剂的临床开发是有可能的。突变和配体结合研究、功能图谱分析以及计算机建模已经揭示了大麻素受体中与激动剂和拮抗剂与CB1和CB2结合有关的关键残基和结构域。此外,CB2经历了更快的进化,配体结合和功效的结果不能自动从大鼠或小鼠的CB2外推至人类。此外,丧失CB1亲和力是CB2选择性配体的关键特性,尽管大鼠CB1与人类CB1有97%的同源性,但关键差异确实存在,这在药物设计中具有进一步开发利用的潜力。在本文中,我们简要回顾了以往的大麻素受体模型以及突变/结合研究。我们还回顾了相对于CB1和CB2的结合亲和力比率。然后,我们利用自己的模型来说明参与这些结合亲和力差异的关键大麻素受体残基和结合亚结构域,并讨论如何在CB2特异性配体的开发中利用这些差异。关于CB2物种特异性结合亲和力的已发表报告很少,我们认为在CB2激动剂从临床前研究推进到临床研究之前,这一情况需要得到纠正。