Shi Junyi, Wang Minmin, Kakunze Adelard, Margai Hawa Catherine, Hu Huang, Feng Yikai, Okaka Daniel, Idris Muhammad Abdullahi, Jin Yinzi, Ren Minghui
Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
African Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
China CDC Wkly. 2025 May 2;7(18):620-627. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.103.
Approximately 70% of funding for malaria prevention and control (P&C) in Sub-Saharan Africa comes from global assistance, yet progress has stagnated over the past decade.
We constructed a cascade of malaria P&C services and analyzed its coverage and quality across 26 African countries from 2011-2022. Panel analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of four major donors [the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GF), and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF)], which account for 90% of global funding, in implementing the cascade.
Recommended practice coverage doubled during 2011-2016 but decreased by 10% by 2022. Unrecommended practices followed the same pattern. Total funding from 2011-2020 reached 7.15 billion USA Dollar (USD), with the USA and GF steadily contributing 94.65%, while the UK and UNICEF demonstrated notable funding reductions. Overall, the funding showed limited correlation with the cascade coverage and quality, promoting directly only the upstream measures.
Our findings highlight four key challenges: retrogression of cascade coverage since the late 2010s, persistent gaps between recommended and unrecommended practices, funding constraints, and limited direct effects of donor funding. Strengthening health system capacity at the farthest end of the cascade may provide a solution to this dilemma.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区约70%的疟疾预防与控制(P&C)资金来自全球援助,但在过去十年中进展停滞不前。
我们构建了一个疟疾预防与控制服务级联,并分析了2011年至2022年期间26个非洲国家的覆盖范围和质量。进行了面板分析,以检验占全球资金90%的四个主要捐助方[美利坚合众国(美国)、联合王国(英国)、抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾全球基金(全球基金)以及联合国儿童基金会(儿基会)]在实施该级联方面的成效。
推荐做法的覆盖率在2011年至2016年期间翻了一番,但到2022年下降了10%。非推荐做法也呈现相同模式。2011年至2020年的总资金达到71.5亿美元,美国和全球基金稳定贡献了94.65%,而英国和儿基会的资金显著减少。总体而言,资金与级联覆盖范围和质量的相关性有限,仅直接促进了上游措施。
我们的研究结果突出了四个关键挑战:自2010年代末以来级联覆盖范围的倒退、推荐做法与非推荐做法之间持续存在的差距、资金限制以及捐助方资金的直接影响有限。加强级联最末端的卫生系统能力可能为解决这一困境提供办法。