• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤力作用下应用于萎缩无牙下颌骨的骨膜下种植体设计比较:三维有限元分析

Comparison of Subperiosteal Implant Designs Applied to Atrophic and Edentulous Mandible Under Traumatic Forces: 3D Finite Element Analysis.

作者信息

Arı Ilgın, Acar Gülin, Baş İpek Dilara, Tosun Emre

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2025 Jul 15;51(3):295-303. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00073.

DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00073
PMID:40376767
Abstract

This study evaluated the stress distributions of subperiosteal implants (SPI) made of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in 1-piece and 2-piece designs in edentulous and severely atrophic mandibles subjected to trauma forces. This study applied 4 treatment methods to a severely atrophic edentulous mandibular model. Subperiosteal implant designs made of PEEK consisting of 1 piece in model 1 and two in model 2 were used. Subperiosteal implant designs made of titanium composed of 1 piece in model 3 and two in model 4 were used. Each of the subperiosteal implants was fixed on the mandibular model with 14 osteosynthesis screws placed in the tension lines of the mandible. A traumatic force of 2000 N was applied to the mandibular prosthesis in the anteroposterior direction. Maximum principal stress (Pmax), minimum principal stress (Pmin), and Von Mises stress (VMs) values were measured in MPa. In this study, model 3 showed the highest Pmax value in the symphysis region (45.888 MPa), whereas the values in the other models were similar. The mandibular condyle had the highest Pmax in model 2 (941.338 MPa) and the lowest in model 3 (905.756 MPa). All models compared the Pmin values measured in the symphysis, alveolar crest, and condyle region. The VM stress values on the abutments and abutment screws were lower and more stable in PEEK SPI models than titanium SPI models. However, VMs values on titanium SPI metal frameworks were lower than PEEK SPI models. In this finite element analysis, 1-piece PEEK SPI were the most advantageous design regarding mandibular fracture risk when evaluated under traumatic forces. PEEK SPI treatment may provide a less invasive treatment model for patients with severely atrophic mandibles. Additionally, 2-piece subperiosteal implants may provide greater design flexibility in clinical applications and offer advantages in stress distribution, expanding the range of treatment options available to clinicians.

摘要

本研究评估了钛和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)制成的一体式和两件式设计的骨膜下植入物(SPI)在无牙和严重萎缩下颌骨承受创伤力时的应力分布。本研究对严重萎缩的无牙下颌模型应用了4种治疗方法。使用了由PEEK制成的骨膜下植入物设计,模型1为一体式,模型2为两件式。使用了由钛制成的骨膜下植入物设计,模型3为一体式,模型4为两件式。每个骨膜下植入物通过在下颌骨张力线上放置14颗骨合成螺钉固定在下颌模型上。在下颌假体的前后方向施加2000 N的创伤力。以兆帕(MPa)为单位测量最大主应力(Pmax)、最小主应力(Pmin)和冯·米塞斯应力(VMs)值。在本研究中,模型3在联合区显示出最高的Pmax值(45.888 MPa),而其他模型的值相似。下颌髁突在模型2中的Pmax最高(941.338 MPa),在模型3中最低(905.756 MPa)。所有模型比较了在联合区、牙槽嵴和髁突区测量的Pmin值。与钛SPI模型相比,PEEK SPI模型中基台和基台螺钉上的VM应力值更低且更稳定。然而,钛SPI金属框架上的VMs值低于PEEK SPI模型。在这项有限元分析中,在创伤力作用下评估时,一体式PEEK SPI在降低下颌骨骨折风险方面是最有利的设计。PEEK SPI治疗可能为严重萎缩下颌骨患者提供一种侵入性较小的治疗模式。此外,两件式骨膜下植入物在临床应用中可能提供更大的设计灵活性,并在应力分布方面具有优势,从而扩大临床医生可用的治疗选择范围。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Subperiosteal Implant Designs Applied to Atrophic and Edentulous Mandible Under Traumatic Forces: 3D Finite Element Analysis.创伤力作用下应用于萎缩无牙下颌骨的骨膜下种植体设计比较:三维有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2025 Jul 15;51(3):295-303. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00073.
2
Evaluation of treatment options for atrophic mandible under trauma forces: a 3D finite element analysis treatment options for atrophic mandible under trauma forces.创伤力作用下萎缩性下颌骨治疗方案的评估:一项关于创伤力作用下萎缩性下颌骨治疗方案的三维有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06047-6.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone anchored subperiosteal and maxilla anchored subperiosteal implants applied totally edentulous maxilla: finite element stress analysis.常规种植体、颧骨种植体、颧骨骨膜下锚固种植体及上颌骨骨膜下锚固种植体应用于全口无牙上颌骨的生物力学评估:有限元应力分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06387-3.
4
Biomechanical effects of digitally constructed titanium, modified polyetheretherketone, and polyetherketoneketone subperiosteal implants on atrophied maxilla: a finite element analysis.数字化构建的钛、改性聚醚醚酮和聚醚酮酮骨膜下种植体对萎缩上颌骨的生物力学效应:有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06426-z.
5
Comparison of Different Frameworks and Implant Angulations in All-On-Four and Six Concepts: A Finite Element Analysis.全口四颗和六颗种植概念中不同框架与种植体角度的比较:有限元分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Aug;27(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/cid.70078.
6
Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.单颗种植体固位覆盖义齿:通过有限元分析评估种植体长度和直径对其应力分布的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):348-357. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13795. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Mechanical behavior of hybrid custom implant abutments with various crown materials: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料的混合定制种植体基台的力学行为:三维有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06445-w.
8
Biomechanical Analysis of Various Connector Designs of Dental Implant Complex: A Numerical Finite Element Study.牙种植复合体不同连接设计的生物力学分析:一项数值有限元研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 26;75(4):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100873.
9
Dental Versus Zygomatic Implants in the Treatment of Maxillectomy: A Finite Element Analysis.牙种植体与颧骨种植体在上颌骨切除术治疗中的比较:有限元分析。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Jun 1;50(3):220-230. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00008.
10
Implant-supported resin-matrix ceramic crowns with polyetheretherketone coping: a new rehabilitation system proposal.带有聚醚醚酮基底的种植体支持式树脂基陶瓷冠:一种新的修复系统方案。
Dent Mater. 2025 Aug;41(8):1014-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2025.06.012. Epub 2025 Jun 14.