Stringam Jeremiah, Pal Koustav, Niekamp Andrew, Jiwani Rahim, Paolucci Iwan, Kuban Joshua D, Metwalli Zeyad, Huang Steven, Habibollahi Peiman, Chen Stephen, Yevich Steven, Patel Milan, Subudhi Sumit K, Campbell Matthew, Ghia Amol, Tatsui Claudio, Sheth Rahul A
Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1471, Houston, TX 77030-4009.
Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Fla.
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240122. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240122.
Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vertebral augmentation (VA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating pathologic spinal fractures in patients with cancer and adjacent fracture risk following treatment. Materials and Methods This single-institution retrospective study, conducted from January 2017 to September 2020, included patients with cancer who underwent percutaneous VA with or without spine RFA for pathologic spine compression fractures. The primary outcome was pain reduction, assessed using the 10-point visual analog scale before the procedure, at first follow-up, and 2-4 weeks after the procedure. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with epidural cement leak. Results A total of 638 spinal levels in 335 patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 58-74 years]; 147 female, 188 male) were treated. Epidural tumor and retropulsion of bone fragments were present in 15% (93 of 638) and 13% (81 of 638) of treated levels, respectively, while posterior wall erosion was observed in 30% (190 of 638). Substantial pain improvement (greater than two-point reduction) occurred in 81% (519 of 638) of cases. Factors associated with decreased risk of epidural cement leak included RFA (42% no leak vs 38% leak, = .03) and lumbar treatments (49% no leak vs 38% leak, = .02). Adjacent-level fractures occurred in 10.4% of patients. The total complication rate (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher) was 0.6% (four of 638). Conclusion VA and RFA are safe and efficacious treatments for spine fractures in patients with cancer. Ablation Techniques, Kyphoplasty, Vertebroplasty © RSNA, 2025.
目的 评估椎体强化(VA)和射频消融(RFA)治疗癌症患者病理性脊柱骨折及治疗后相邻骨折风险的安全性和有效性。材料与方法 本单机构回顾性研究于2017年1月至2020年9月进行,纳入了因病理性脊柱压缩骨折接受经皮VA联合或不联合脊柱RFA治疗的癌症患者。主要结局为疼痛减轻情况,通过术前、首次随访时以及术后2 - 4周使用10分视觉模拟量表进行评估。采用逻辑回归分析确定与硬膜外骨水泥渗漏相关的因素。结果 共治疗了335例患者的638个脊柱节段(中位年龄65岁[四分位间距,58 - 74岁];女性147例,男性188例)。治疗节段中分别有15%(638个中的93个)存在硬膜外肿瘤和13%(638个中的81个)存在骨碎片后凸,而30%(638个中的190个)观察到后壁侵蚀。81%(638个中的519个)的病例疼痛有显著改善(减轻超过2分)。与硬膜外骨水泥渗漏风险降低相关的因素包括RFA(无渗漏率42% vs 渗漏率38%,P = .03)和腰椎治疗(无渗漏率49% vs 渗漏率38%,P = .02)。10.4%的患者发生相邻节段骨折。总并发症发生率(美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准3级或更高)为0.6%(638个中的4个)。结论 VA和RFA是治疗癌症患者脊柱骨折的安全有效的方法。消融技术、后凸成形术、椎体成形术 © RSNA,2025年