Suppr超能文献

骨水泥联合射频消融治疗脊柱转移瘤的临床疗效及安全性。

Clinical efficacy and safety of bone cement combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of spinal metastases.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, 41 Hailian East Street, Lianyungang, 222003, Jiangsu, China.

School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01998-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of bone cement combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of spinal metastases.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with spinal metastatic tumor admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on different surgical methods, the patients were divided into groups A (treated with RFA combined with bone cement) and B (treated with bone cement only). Group A included 35 patients with 47 segments of diseased vertebral bodies. Group B consisted of 52 patients with 78 vertebral segments. Pain, quality of life score, vertebra height, bone cement leakage, postoperative tumor recurrence, and complications were assessed 3 days and 1 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

All the patients had smooth operation without paraplegia, spinal cord injury, and perioperative death. Visual analogue scales (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores of the two groups significantly improved 3 days and 1 month after surgery compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). Six months after surgery, the VAS and ODI scores of patients in group A were lower than those in group B, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The postoperative vertebral body height of the two groups significantly increased compared with that before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative bone cement permeability in group A was 6.4%, and postoperative tumor recurrence rate was 11.4%. The permeability of bone cement in group B was 20.5%, and the tumor recurrence rate was 30.8%. The bone cement permeability and tumor recurrence rate in group A were lower than those in group B, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone cement combined with RFA for the treatment of spinal metastases can achieve good efficacy, desirable analgesic effect, low incidence of complications, small surgical trauma, and high safety. The proposed method has the value of clinical popularization and application.

摘要

背景

探讨骨水泥联合射频消融(RFA)治疗脊柱转移瘤的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月我院收治的脊柱转移瘤患者的病历资料。根据不同手术方法,将患者分为 A 组(RFA 联合骨水泥治疗)和 B 组(单纯骨水泥治疗)。A 组 35 例,共 47 个病椎;B 组 52 例,共 78 个病椎。术后 3 天及 1、6 个月时评估疼痛、生活质量评分、椎体高度、骨水泥渗漏、术后肿瘤复发及并发症情况。

结果

所有患者手术均顺利完成,无截瘫、脊髓损伤及围手术期死亡。与术前相比,两组术后 3 天及 1 个月时视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分均明显改善(P<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后 6 个月时,A 组 VAS 和 ODI 评分低于 B 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后椎体高度均明显高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A 组骨水泥渗漏率为 6.4%,术后肿瘤复发率为 11.4%;B 组骨水泥渗漏率为 20.5%,肿瘤复发率为 30.8%。A 组骨水泥渗漏率和肿瘤复发率均低于 B 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

骨水泥联合 RFA 治疗脊柱转移瘤可取得较好疗效,镇痛效果理想,并发症发生率低,手术创伤小,安全性高,具有临床推广应用价值。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Outcomes in the radiosurgical management of metastatic spine disease.转移性脊柱疾病的放射外科治疗结果。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 9;4(2):283-293. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.10.007. eCollection 2019 Apr-Jun.
10
State of the Art Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Disease.脊柱转移瘤的治疗现状。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jun 1;82(6):757-769. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx567.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验