• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物诱导的继发性肿瘤:FAERS数据库的不成比例分析。

Drug-induced second tumors: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.

作者信息

Chen Shupeng, Zhang Yuzhe, Li Xiaojian, Tang Nana, Zeng Yingjian

机构信息

School of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, China.

The First Laboratory of Cancer Institute, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjingbei Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Discov Oncol. 2025 May 16;16(1):786. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02502-6.

DOI:10.1007/s12672-025-02502-6
PMID:40377769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084198/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced second tumors (DIST) refer to new primary cancers that develop during or after the treatment of an initial cancer due to the long-term effects of medications. As a severe long-term adverse event, DIST has gained widespread attention globally in recent years. With the increasing prevalence of cancer treatments and the prolonged survival of patients, drug-induced second tumors have become more prominent and pose a significant public health challenge. However, most existing studies have focused on individual drugs or small patient cohorts, lacking large-scale, real-world data evaluations. Particularly, the potential second-tumor risk of new drugs remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically assess the adverse event signals between drugs and second tumors using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, employing disproportionality analysis (DPA) methods. It particularly focuses on uncovering drugs that have not clearly labeled second-tumor risks.

METHODS

Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), covering reports from its inception to the third quarter of 2024, was retrieved. After data standardization, four disproportionality methods were used: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). These methods assessed the correlation between azacitidine and adverse drug events (ADEs). Additionally, the Weibull Shape Parameter (WSP) was used to analyze the characteristic patterns of time-to-onset curves. Newly discovered signals were verified against FDA drug labels to confirm their novelty. The Weibull analysis was conducted to examine the temporal aspects of adverse event occurrences.

RESULTS

Since 2004, drug-induced tumor events have been increasing annually, with a total of 7597 drug-related tumor adverse events recorded. A total of 250 drugs were identified as having potential risk signals. High-incidence populations were primarily aged between 65 and 85 years, with a higher proportion of individuals with a body weight ≥ 90 kg. The most frequent occurrence was observed in patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (13.36%). Among the top 5 drugs with the highest number of reported drug-induced second tumor adverse events, IMATINIB (906 reports), RUXOLITINIB (554 reports), PALBOCICLIB (552 reports), OCTREOTIDE (399 reports), and DOXORUBICIN (380 reports) were identified. Among these, PALBOCICLIB, OCTREOTIDE, and DOXORUBICIN are drugs for which the risk of drug-induced second tumors is not explicitly mentioned in their labels. A total of 76 drugs were identified through four disproportionality algorithms (ROR, PRR, MGPS, BCPNN), with a minimum time to drug-induced tumor occurrence of 5 years, exhibiting an early failure-type curve.

CONCLUSION

This study, based on large-scale real-world data, reveals the potential associations between drugs and second tumors, especially highlighting the risks of some new drugs. The findings provide valuable insights for drug safety monitoring and have significant public health implications. By uncovering previously unrecognized potential risks, this research lays the groundwork for further advancements in pharmacovigilance.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/6f26a381fe62/12672_2025_2502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/10c6dc0fa99b/12672_2025_2502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/82ce6401ca15/12672_2025_2502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/7c81e0c2d3d2/12672_2025_2502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/dc53cff8e1ae/12672_2025_2502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/6f26a381fe62/12672_2025_2502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/10c6dc0fa99b/12672_2025_2502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/82ce6401ca15/12672_2025_2502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/7c81e0c2d3d2/12672_2025_2502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/dc53cff8e1ae/12672_2025_2502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b762/12084198/6f26a381fe62/12672_2025_2502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

药物诱发的二次肿瘤(DIST)是指由于药物的长期作用,在初始癌症治疗期间或之后发生的新的原发性癌症。作为一种严重的长期不良事件,近年来药物诱发的二次肿瘤在全球范围内受到广泛关注。随着癌症治疗的普及率不断提高以及患者生存期的延长,药物诱发的二次肿瘤变得更加突出,对公共卫生构成了重大挑战。然而,大多数现有研究都集中在个别药物或小患者队列上,缺乏大规模的真实世界数据评估。特别是,新药潜在的二次肿瘤风险仍未得到充分探索。

目的

本研究旨在使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,采用不成比例分析(DPA)方法,系统评估药物与二次肿瘤之间的不良事件信号。特别关注发现那些未明确标注二次肿瘤风险的药物。

方法

检索了美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)从成立到2024年第三季度的报告数据。经过数据标准化后,使用了四种不成比例分析方法:报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比值比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽马泊松收缩器(MGPS)。这些方法评估了阿扎胞苷与药物不良事件(ADEs)之间的相关性。此外,使用威布尔形状参数(WSP)分析发病时间曲线的特征模式。针对新发现的信号对照美国食品药品监督管理局的药物标签进行验证,以确认其新颖性。进行威布尔分析以检查不良事件发生的时间方面。

结果

自2004年以来,药物诱发的肿瘤事件每年都在增加,共记录了7597例与药物相关的肿瘤不良事件。共识别出250种具有潜在风险信号的药物。高发病群体主要年龄在65至85岁之间,体重≥90kg的个体比例较高。最常发生在慢性髓性白血病患者中(13.36%)。在报告药物诱发二次肿瘤不良事件数量最多的前5种药物中,分别是伊马替尼(906例报告)、芦可替尼(554例报告)、哌柏西利(552例报告)、奥曲肽(399例报告)和多柔比星(380例报告)。其中,哌柏西利、奥曲肽和多柔比星在其标签中未明确提及药物诱发二次肿瘤的风险。通过四种不成比例算法(ROR、PRR、MGPS、BCPNN)共识别出76种药物,药物诱发肿瘤发生的最短时间为5年,呈现早期失效型曲线。

结论

本研究基于大规模真实世界数据,揭示了药物与二次肿瘤之间的潜在关联,尤其突出了一些新药的风险。研究结果为药物安全监测提供了有价值的见解,具有重大的公共卫生意义。通过发现以前未被认识到的潜在风险,本研究为药物警戒的进一步发展奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Drug-induced second tumors: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.药物诱导的继发性肿瘤:FAERS数据库的不成比例分析。
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 16;16(1):786. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02502-6.
2
A multidimensional assessment of adverse events associated with paliperidone palmitate: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS and JADER databases.帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯相关不良事件的多维评估:一项使用FAERS和JADER数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06493-0.
3
Adverse event reporting of faricimab: a disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.法西单抗的不良事件报告:对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的不成比例性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 12;16:1521358. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1521358. eCollection 2025.
4
Post-market safety profile of cefiderocol: a real-world pharmacovigilance exploratory analysis based on U.S. FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).头孢地尔的上市后安全性概况:基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实世界药物警戒探索性分析
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Mar 11;26(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00894-3.
5
A pharmacovigilance study of etoposide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, what does the real world say?在FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中进行的依托泊苷药物警戒研究,现实情况如何?
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1259908. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1259908. eCollection 2023.
6
Age-stratified analysis of adverse event signals for clarithromycin: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.克拉霉素不良事件信号的年龄分层分析:使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的不成比例分析。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 Jan 2;16:20420986241311231. doi: 10.1177/20420986241311231. eCollection 2025.
7
Adverse drug events associated with linezolid administration: a real-world pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2023 using the FAERS database.与利奈唑胺给药相关的药物不良事件:一项使用FAERS数据库的2004年至2023年真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 16;15:1338902. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1338902. eCollection 2024.
8
A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis for Demethylation Drug: Findings from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting Database.去甲基化药物的真实世界药物警戒分析:来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告数据库的结果
Oncology. 2025 Jan 30:1-18. doi: 10.1159/000543519.
9
Risk of drug-induced pericardial effusion: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.药物性心包积液的风险:对FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的不成比例性分析
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Feb 7;26(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00867-6.
10
Post-marketing safety profile of ganirelix in women: a 20-year pharmacovigilance analysis of global adverse drug event databases (2004-2024).加尼瑞克在女性中的上市后安全性概况:对全球药品不良事件数据库(2004 - 2024年)的20年药物警戒分析
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00920-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Disproportionality analysis and risk factor assessment of drug-associated thyroid dysfunction adverse events: a study based on the FAERS database.药物相关甲状腺功能障碍不良事件的不成比例性分析及风险因素评估:一项基于FAERS数据库的研究
Endocr Connect. 2025 Jul 17;14(7). doi: 10.1530/EC-25-0305. Print 2025 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal relationship between branched-chain amino acids and leukemia risk: insights from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.支链氨基酸与白血病风险之间的因果关系:来自两项孟德尔随机化研究的见解
Hematology. 2024 Dec;29(1):2433904. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2024.2433904. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Drug-induced hearing disorders: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.药物性听力障碍:对FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的不成比例性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 22;15:1480994. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1480994. eCollection 2024.
3
Vistas in Signaling Pathways Implicated in HSV-1 Reactivation.
信号通路在单纯疱疹病毒 1 再激活中作用的新视角。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 20;25(22):12472. doi: 10.3390/ijms252212472.
4
Research Hotspots and Trends in Global Cancer immunometabolism:A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2023.全球癌症免疫代谢的研究热点与趋势:2000年至2023年的文献计量分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Nov 12;17:5117-5137. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S495330. eCollection 2024.
5
DNA damage response inhibitors in cancer therapy: lessons from the past, current status and future implications.癌症治疗中的DNA损伤反应抑制剂:过去的经验教训、现状与未来启示
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2025 Jan;24(1):19-39. doi: 10.1038/s41573-024-01060-w. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
6
Colorectal cancer cell dormancy: An insight into pathways.结直肠癌细胞休眠:对途径的深入了解。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 7;30(33):3810-3817. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i33.3810.
7
Neratinib safety evaluation: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.奈拉替尼安全性评估:来自FAERS数据库的真实世界不良事件分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1425171. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1425171. eCollection 2024.
8
Mechanisms of radiation-induced tissue damage and response.辐射诱导的组织损伤和反应机制。
MedComm (2020). 2024 Sep 20;5(10):e725. doi: 10.1002/mco2.725. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
A randomized study of 6 versus 3 years of adjuvant imatinib in patients with localized GIST at high risk of relapse.一项针对复发高风险局限性胃肠间质瘤患者辅助使用伊马替尼6年与3年的随机研究。
Ann Oncol. 2024 Dec;35(12):1157-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2343. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
10
Risk of Second Tumors and T-Cell Lymphoma after CAR T-Cell Therapy. Reply.嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法后发生第二肿瘤和T细胞淋巴瘤的风险。回复。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Sep 5;391(9):870-871. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2408733.