Chung Andrea P, Shafrin Jason T, Vadgama Sachin, Hurley Kristen, Perales Miguel-Angel, Alsfeld Leonard C, Muthukrishnan Sanjana, Patel Anik R, Shah Gunjan L, Maziarz Richard T
Center for Healthcare Economics and Policy, FTI Consulting, Inc, Washington, DC.
Center for Healthcare Economics and Policy, FTI Consulting, Inc, Los Angeles, CA.
Blood Adv. 2025 Sep 23;9(18):4727-4735. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015634.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown curative potential for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other malignancies, but its accessibility among Medicare patients, particularly in disadvantaged populations, remains uncertain. This study aims to assess CAR-T use among Medicare patients with DLBCL receiving third-line or later (3L+) treatment, focusing on access disparities and their impact on clinical outcomes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2007 to 2020, multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics and the effects of distance to authorized treatment centers (ATCs) on CAR-T access. Between 2017 and 2020, 2241 patients were treated for 3L+ DLBCL in the SEER-Medicare data, of whom 122 (5.4%) received CAR-Ts. CAR-T recipients were less likely to have multiple comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.904; P = .001) but more likely to live in higher income areas (OR, 1.176; P = .004). If distance to the nearest ATC for "poor-access" states (average distance to ATC, 104.4 miles) decreased to the average distance in "better-access" states (34.2 miles), there would be a 37.6% increase in number of patients receiving CAR-Ts (6.6%-9.1%; P < .001). These findings highlight substantial disparities in CAR-T use, driven by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Addressing these barriers could significantly enhance equitable access to CAR-T therapy and improve outcomes for underserved populations, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce geographic and systemic barriers to care.
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞(CAR-T)疗法已显示出对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)及其他恶性肿瘤患者具有治愈潜力,但在医疗保险患者中,尤其是弱势群体中,其可及性仍不明确。本研究旨在评估接受三线及后续(3L+)治疗的DLBCL医疗保险患者中CAR-T的使用情况,重点关注可及性差异及其对临床结局的影响。利用2007年至2020年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据,采用多因素逻辑回归评估患者特征以及与授权治疗中心(ATC)的距离对CAR-T可及性的影响。在2017年至2020年期间,SEER-医疗保险数据中有2241例患者接受了3L+ DLBCL治疗,其中122例(5.4%)接受了CAR-T治疗。接受CAR-T治疗的患者合并多种疾病的可能性较小(优势比[OR],0.904;P = 0.001),但更有可能居住在高收入地区(OR,1.176;P = 0.004)。如果“可及性差”州(到ATC的平均距离为104.4英里)到最近ATC的距离降至“可及性较好”州的平均距离(34.2英里),接受CAR-T治疗的患者数量将增加37.6%(6.6%-9.1%;P < 0.001)。这些发现突出了CAR-T使用方面存在的巨大差异,这些差异由地理和社会经济因素驱动。消除这些障碍可显著提高CAR-T疗法的公平可及性,并改善服务不足人群的治疗结局,强调需要采取针对性干预措施以减少地理和系统性护理障碍。