文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and safety of alginate-based dressings in burn wound and donor site wound management associated with burn surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Lou Jiaqi, Xiang Ziyi, Zhu Xiaoyu, Song Jingyao, Huang Neng, Li Jiliang, Jin Guoying, Cui Shengyong, Xu Pei, Le Xin, Fan Youfen, Xu Sida

机构信息

Burn Department, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, No. 41 Northwest Street, Haishu District, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang Province, China.

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 May 16;25(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02956-z.


DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02956-z
PMID:40380141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12083019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alginate-based dressings are widely used in burn care for their absorptive and healing properties; however, inconsistencies in clinical outcomes remain. METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing alginate dressings to other treatments in burn patients and their donor sites. Inclusion criteria focused on prospective trials with measured outcomes such as healing time, pain scores, dressing change frequency, and adverse events. Data extraction and quality assessment adhered to standardized methods, and meta-analyses were performed using R 4.4.2 and Stata 15.0 with the GRADE approach to evaluate evidence certainty. Data were aggregated and reported as relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly shorter healing time with alginate dressings versus controls, showing a MD of -1.09 days (95% CI: -1.67 to -0.31, p < 0.001, I = 94.6%). Pain scores also favored alginate dressings, with a SMD of -1.37 (95% CI: -2.53 to -0.21, p = 0.000, I = 90.9%). There was no significant difference in dressing change frequency, with an SMD of 2.18 (95% CI: -4.29 to -0.07, p = 0.000, I = 94.0%). Adverse events showed a RR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.50 to 1.30, p = 0.021, I = 51.1%), indicating similar safety profiles in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that alginate dressings not only significantly reduce healing time but also offer clinically relevant benefits, including reduced pain and fewer dressing changes, making them a valuable option in burn wound management. However, their effect on dressing change frequency and adverse events remains comparable to control treatments. Despite the methodological limitations such as high heterogeneity and potential biases, alginate dressings maintain advantages in clinical settings. Standardization of evaluation criteria and long-term studies are necessary to enhance the understanding and application of alginate dressings in diverse burn wound and donor site wound care settings.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/da66c99b2f36/12893_2025_2956_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/8de8a8cc1629/12893_2025_2956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/13be6da03045/12893_2025_2956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/b975052d47e4/12893_2025_2956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/0d7e6f01d15b/12893_2025_2956_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/4ae9fc922c62/12893_2025_2956_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/4469eda7f1b3/12893_2025_2956_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/da66c99b2f36/12893_2025_2956_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/8de8a8cc1629/12893_2025_2956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/13be6da03045/12893_2025_2956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/b975052d47e4/12893_2025_2956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/0d7e6f01d15b/12893_2025_2956_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/4ae9fc922c62/12893_2025_2956_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/4469eda7f1b3/12893_2025_2956_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/641d/12083019/da66c99b2f36/12893_2025_2956_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and safety of alginate-based dressings in burn wound and donor site wound management associated with burn surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.

BMC Surg. 2025-5-16

[2]
Hydrogel dressings for venous leg ulcers.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-5

[3]
Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-8-16

[4]
Dressings and topical agents for the management of open wounds after surgical treatment for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[5]
Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-6-22

[6]
Topical treatment for facial burns.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-7-29

[7]
Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-12

[8]
Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-2-15

[9]
Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-6-25

[10]
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-6-15

引用本文的文献

[1]
From Sea to Therapy: Marine Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Wound Healing.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025-7-23

[2]
Collagen-Based Products in Wound, Skin, and Health Care.

Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2025-7-28

本文引用的文献

[1]
Enhancing treatment adherence in dialysis patients through digital health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ren Fail. 2025-12

[2]
Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for predicting wound healing potential in burns: A critical examination.

Burns. 2025-5

[3]
Strategies for Prevention and Management of Postoperative Wounds and Scars Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: An Evidence-Based Review.

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025-4-1

[4]
Using network analysis and large-language models to obtain a landscape of the literature on dressing materials for wound healing: The predominance of chitosan and other biomacromolecules: A review.

Int J Biol Macromol. 2025-5

[5]
Narrative Review of the Use of Hydrocolloids in Dermatology: Applications and Benefits.

J Clin Med. 2025-2-18

[6]
Are All Alginate Dressings Equivalent?

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2025-3

[7]
Skin-inspired elastomer-hydrogel Janus fibrous membrane creates a superior pro-regenerative microenvironment toward complete skin regeneration.

Biomater Adv. 2025-5

[8]
A Comprehensive Analysis of Moist Versus Non-Moist Dressings for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Health Sci Rep. 2025-1-17

[9]
Observational study of venous leg ulcer treated with a native collagen-alginate dressing and the impact on wound-related quality of life.

Wound Manag Prev. 2024-12

[10]
A review on multifunctional calcium alginate fibers for full-time and multipurposed wound treatment: From fundamentals to advanced applications.

Int J Biol Macromol. 2025-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索