Suppr超能文献

激光散斑对比成像预测烧伤创面愈合潜力的有效性:一项批判性研究。

Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for predicting wound healing potential in burns: A critical examination.

作者信息

De Mey Kimberly, De Decker Ignace, Gush Rodney, Hoeksema Henk, Verbelen Jozef, De Coninck Petra, Blondeel Phillip, Monstrey Stan, Claes Karel E Y

机构信息

Burn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

Burn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium; Department of Plastic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

出版信息

Burns. 2025 May;51(4):107449. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107449. Epub 2025 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of burn depth is imperative for the efficacious management of burns. Although clinical assessment is commonly used, its accuracy ranges only between 50 % and 70 %. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is considered as a gold standard - with an accuracy exceeding 95 %, - for the objective measurement of Healing Potential (HP), HP being the output of the LDI device, as colour-coded on LDI blood flow images. Despite its proven efficacy, widespread adoption is impeded by practical challenges. Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) emerges as a possible alternative. This study investigated the performance and accuracy of LSCI in comparison with LDI for predicting the HP of burns; LDI was assumed to provide 'ground truth' for the assessment of HP.

METHODS

Hospitalized burn patients underwent LDI and LSCI scans between day 2 and day 5 postburn. Analysis involved selecting corresponding regions of interest (ROI) in target wounds prioritized by LDI and LSCI perspectives.

RESULTS

In 19 patients, 112 ROI within LDI-priority ranges were collected from 50 target wounds. 130 ROI within LSCI-priority ranges were collected from 52 target wounds. Positive predictive values (PPV) were low, at only 50.8 % and 68.2 % for HP14-21 and HP21, respectively, and 86.9 % for HP14.

CONCLUSION

Objective assessment by LSCI for burns is not recommended, as it fails to detect deep dermal blood flow, leading to an overestimation of burn severity and potential inadequacies in therapy.

摘要

背景

准确评估烧伤深度对于烧伤的有效治疗至关重要。虽然临床评估常用,但准确性仅在50%至70%之间。激光多普勒成像(LDI)被视为客观测量愈合潜力(HP)的金标准,其准确性超过95%,HP是LDI设备的输出结果,在LDI血流图像上以颜色编码显示。尽管其疗效已得到证实,但实际应用中的挑战阻碍了其广泛采用。激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)成为一种可能的替代方法。本研究调查了LSCI与LDI相比在预测烧伤HP方面的性能和准确性;假定LDI为HP评估提供“真实情况”。

方法

烧伤住院患者在烧伤后第2天至第5天接受LDI和LSCI扫描。分析包括在LDI和LSCI视角优先考虑的目标伤口中选择相应的感兴趣区域(ROI)。

结果

在19例患者中,从50个目标伤口收集了112个LDI优先范围内的ROI。从52个目标伤口收集了130个LSCI优先范围内的ROI。阳性预测值(PPV)较低,HP14 - 21和HP21分别仅为50.8%和68.2%,HP14为86.9%。

结论

不建议使用LSCI对烧伤进行客观评估,因为它无法检测到真皮深层血流,导致对烧伤严重程度的高估以及治疗可能不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验