• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用地理信息系统(GIS)、层次分析法(AHP)和模糊层次分析法(fuzzy AHP)绘制中国南方山区地下水潜力区图。

Mapping the groundwater potential zones in mountainous areas of Southern China using GIS, AHP, and fuzzy AHP.

作者信息

Chen Meng, Zhang Shuangxi, Liu Shengbo, Li Mengkui, Zhang Tao, Wu Tengfei, Bu Xiangyu

机构信息

School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.

Office of Research, City University of Wuhan, Wuhan, 430083, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 17;15(1):17159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01837-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-01837-y
PMID:40382415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12085692/
Abstract

Rapid identification of groundwater sources is crucial for emergency water supplies. Yudu County (YDC) in Southern China serves as a case study due to its typical mountainous terrain and pressing groundwater demands. To address the limitations of conventional groundwater mapping methods in large-scale areas with sparse data, this study integrates remote sensing (RS), geographic information systems (GIS), and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques to delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) in YDC. Following a series of correlation tests, seven assessment indicators were selected from various groundwater influencing factors, including two innovative ones: terrestrial water storage change (TWSC) and spring flow. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy AHP (FAHP) models were employed to calculate factor weights, and GWPZ maps were generated using weighted overlay analysis in GIS. The model performance was validated using borewell data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and yield prediction models. Additionally, four water enrichment types and their spatial distribution were identified by field investigations and yield prediction assessments. Results indicated a remarkable similarity between GWPZs delineated by AHP and FAHP, categorized into five classes: very high (13.92% for AHP and 14.33% for FAHP), high (26.29 and 27.55%), medium (29.33 and 28.14%), low (20.66 and 21.50%), and very low (9.80 and 8.48%). The area under the curve (AUC) for FAHP was 85.09%, slightly higher than the 84.41% of AHP, while the correlation coefficient (R of the prediction model improved from 0.747 to 0.817 with FAHP. These findings confirmed the reliability of combining GIS and MCDA methods to delineate GWPZs, with FAHP demonstrating an advantage over AHP. The proposed methodology and resulting mapping significantly enhance sustainable water resource management and development in YDC, offering a practical framework for rapid groundwater investigations in disaster response, as well as for long-term water security planning in similar mountainous environments.

摘要

快速识别地下水源对于应急供水至关重要。中国南方的于都县(YDC)因其典型的山区地形和紧迫的地下水需求而成为一个案例研究对象。为了解决传统地下水测绘方法在数据稀疏的大规模区域的局限性,本研究整合了遥感(RS)、地理信息系统(GIS)和多准则决策分析(MCDA)技术,以划定于都县的地下水潜力区(GWPZs)。经过一系列相关性测试,从各种地下水影响因素中选择了七个评估指标,其中包括两个创新指标:陆地水储量变化(TWSC)和泉水流量。采用层次分析法(AHP)和模糊层次分析法(FAHP)模型计算因子权重,并在GIS中使用加权叠加分析生成GWPZ地图。利用钻孔数据、接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线和产量预测模型对模型性能进行了验证。此外,通过现场调查和产量预测评估确定了四种富水类型及其空间分布。结果表明,AHP和FAHP划定的GWPZs之间具有显著相似性,分为五类:极高(AHP为13.92%,FAHP为14.33%)、高(26.29%和27.55%)、中(29.33%和28.14%)、低(20.66%和21.50%)和极低(9.80%和8.48%)。FAHP的曲线下面积(AUC)为85.09%,略高于AHP的84.41%,而预测模型的相关系数(R)从AHP的0.747提高到FAHP的0.817。这些发现证实了结合GIS和MCDA方法划定GWPZs的可靠性,FAHP显示出优于AHP的优势。所提出的方法和生成的地图显著加强了于都县的可持续水资源管理和开发,为灾害应对中的快速地下水调查以及类似山区环境中的长期水安全规划提供了一个实用框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/85816bbd6d11/41598_2025_1837_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/88b585fcefbb/41598_2025_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/5e5416be74dd/41598_2025_1837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/42d15f098c10/41598_2025_1837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/1f584fd80125/41598_2025_1837_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/c540162a87cb/41598_2025_1837_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/733556c8f5b7/41598_2025_1837_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/f18938b506b4/41598_2025_1837_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/ef3875a6acf8/41598_2025_1837_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/abac638483d6/41598_2025_1837_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/02f3b244453d/41598_2025_1837_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/dccec0c5131b/41598_2025_1837_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/0ca3e597bb03/41598_2025_1837_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/85816bbd6d11/41598_2025_1837_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/88b585fcefbb/41598_2025_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/5e5416be74dd/41598_2025_1837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/42d15f098c10/41598_2025_1837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/1f584fd80125/41598_2025_1837_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/c540162a87cb/41598_2025_1837_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/733556c8f5b7/41598_2025_1837_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/f18938b506b4/41598_2025_1837_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/ef3875a6acf8/41598_2025_1837_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/abac638483d6/41598_2025_1837_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/02f3b244453d/41598_2025_1837_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/dccec0c5131b/41598_2025_1837_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/0ca3e597bb03/41598_2025_1837_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a71/12085692/85816bbd6d11/41598_2025_1837_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping the groundwater potential zones in mountainous areas of Southern China using GIS, AHP, and fuzzy AHP.运用地理信息系统(GIS)、层次分析法(AHP)和模糊层次分析法(fuzzy AHP)绘制中国南方山区地下水潜力区图。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 17;15(1):17159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01837-y.
2
Integrated assessment of groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP: a case study in Peddavagu watershed, India.利用 GIS 和模糊层次分析法对地下水潜力区和人工补给区进行综合评估:以印度佩达瓦古流域为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 29;195(7):906. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11474-5.
3
Delineation of groundwater potential zones at micro-spatial units of Nagaon district in Assam, India, using GIS-based MCDA and AHP techniques.利用 GIS 支持的多准则决策分析和层次分析法,在印度阿萨姆邦那加翁地区的微观空间单元中对地下水潜力区进行划分。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Sep;31(41):54107-54128. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24505-4. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Integrating geospatial, hydrogeological, and geophysical data to identify groundwater recharge potential zones in the Sulaymaniyah basin, NE of Iraq.整合地理空间、水文地质和地球物理数据,以确定伊拉克东北部苏莱曼尼亚盆地的地下水补给潜力区。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94603-z.
5
Mapping coastal groundwater potential zones using remote sensing based AHP model in Al Qunfudhah region along Red Sea, Saudi Arabia.利用基于遥感的层次分析法模型绘制沙特阿拉伯红海沿岸阿尔昆法达地区的沿海地下水潜在区
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 21;10(7):e28186. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28186. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
6
Application of analytical hierarchical process, multi-influencing factor, and geospatial techniques for groundwater potential zonation in a semi-arid region of western India.运用层次分析法、多影响因素和地理空间技术对印度西部半干旱地区地下水潜力进行分区。
J Contam Hydrol. 2023 Feb;253:104122. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104122. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
Delineation of groundwater potential zonation using geoinformatics and AHP techniques with remote sensing data.利用地理信息学和层次分析法技术以及遥感数据进行地下水位势分区
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 7;10(3):e25532. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25532. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
8
Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India.基于地理信息系统的层次分析法与模糊层次分析法在医院选址中的比较:以印度普拉亚格拉杰市为例
GeoJournal. 2022;87(5):3507-3528. doi: 10.1007/s10708-021-10445-y. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
Groundwater spring potential zonation using AHP and fuzzy-AHP in Eastern Himalayan region: Papum Pare district, Arunachal Pradesh, India.利用层次分析法和模糊层次分析法对东喜马拉雅地区帕木错地区的地下水泉潜力进行分区。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10317-10333. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26769-w. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
10
Delineation of groundwater potential zones of the transboundary aquifers within the semiarid Bulal catchment, Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部半干旱布拉尔集水区跨界含水层地下水潜力区的划定
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Mar 10;195(4):458. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11088-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating geospatial, hydrogeological, and geophysical data to identify groundwater recharge potential zones in the Sulaymaniyah basin, NE of Iraq.整合地理空间、水文地质和地球物理数据,以确定伊拉克东北部苏莱曼尼亚盆地的地下水补给潜力区。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94603-z.
2
Application of remote sensing and electrical resistivity technique for delineating groundwater potential in North Western Nigeria.遥感与电阻率技术在尼日利亚西北部地下水潜力 delineating 中的应用。 需注意,“delineating”可能拼写有误,准确可能是“delineating”(描绘、划定等意思) ,结合语境完整准确意思可能是“遥感与电阻率技术在尼日利亚西北部划定地下水潜力区域中的应用” 。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69633-8.
3
Groundwater-rock interactions and mixing in fault-controlled karstic aquifers: A structural, hydrogeochemical and multi-isotopic review of the Pontina Plain (Central Italy).
断层控制的岩溶含水层中的地下水 - 岩石相互作用与混合:对蓬蒂纳平原(意大利中部)的结构、水文地球化学和多同位素综述
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175439. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175439. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
4
Groundwater spring potential zonation using AHP and fuzzy-AHP in Eastern Himalayan region: Papum Pare district, Arunachal Pradesh, India.利用层次分析法和模糊层次分析法对东喜马拉雅地区帕木错地区的地下水泉潜力进行分区。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10317-10333. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26769-w. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Delineation of groundwater potential zones of the transboundary aquifers within the semiarid Bulal catchment, Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部半干旱布拉尔集水区跨界含水层地下水潜力区的划定
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Mar 10;195(4):458. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11088-x.
6
GIS-based groundwater potential mapping in Shahroud plain, Iran. A comparison among statistical (bivariate and multivariate), data mining and MCDM approaches.基于 GIS 的伊朗沙赫鲁德平原地下水潜力制图。统计(二元和多元)、数据挖掘和 MCDM 方法的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25;658:160-177. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.115. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Groundwater potential mapping using C5.0, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in GIS.基于 GIS 的 C5.0、随机森林和多元自适应回归样条模型的地下水潜力图绘制。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Feb 17;190(3):149. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6507-8.
8
Global hydrological cycles and world water resources.全球水文循环与世界水资源。
Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1068-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1128845.