Broomand Lomer Nima, Ghasemi Amirhosein, Ahmadzadeh Amir Mahmoud, A Torigian Drew
Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04982-0.
High-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is linked to lower survival rates and more aggressive disease progression. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of MRI-derived radiomics as a non-invasive approach for pre-operative differentiation of high-grade from low-grade ccRCC.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for radiomics models and combined models, where the latter integrated clinical and radiological features with radiomics. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify potential outliers.
A total of 15 studies comprising 2,265 patients were included, with seven and six studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics and combined models, respectively. The pooled estimates of the radiomics model were as follows: sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.84; PLR, 4.17; NLR, 0.28; DOR, 17.34; and AUC, 0.84. For the combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.87, 0.81, 3.78, 0.21, 28.57, and 0.90, respectively. Radiomics models trained on smaller cohorts exhibited a significantly higher pooled specificity and PLR than those trained on larger cohorts. Also, radiomics models based on single-user segmentation demonstrated a significantly higher pooled specificity compared to multi-user segmentation.
Radiomics has demonstrated potential as a non-invasive tool for grading ccRCC, with combined models achieving superior performance.
高级别透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)与较低的生存率和更具侵袭性的疾病进展相关。本研究旨在评估基于MRI的放射组学作为一种非侵入性方法对高级别与低级别ccRCC进行术前鉴别的诊断性能。
在PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库中进行系统检索。使用QUADAS-2和METRICS进行质量评估。采用双变量模型估计合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断比值比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)。对放射组学模型和联合模型分别进行Meta分析,联合模型将临床和放射学特征与放射组学相结合。进行亚组分析以识别异质性的潜在来源。进行敏感度分析以识别潜在的异常值。
共纳入15项研究,包括2265例患者,其中7项和6项研究分别纳入放射组学模型和联合模型的Meta分析。放射组学模型的合并估计值如下:敏感度为0.78;特异度为0.84;PLR为4.17;NLR为0.28;DOR为17.34;AUC为0.84。联合模型的合并敏感度、特异度、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为0.87、0.81、3.78、0.21、28.57和0.90。在较小队列上训练的放射组学模型表现出比在较大队列上训练的模型显著更高的合并特异度和PLR。此外,基于单用户分割的放射组学模型与多用户分割相比,表现出显著更高的合并特异度。
放射组学已证明作为一种对ccRCC进行分级的非侵入性工具具有潜力,联合模型表现更优。