文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

非侵入性脑刺激对脑瘫患儿运动和平衡功能的安全性与有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Safety and effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation on mobility and balance function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhong Mengru, Zhang Yage, Luo Jie, Chen Tingting, Zhang Jingbo, Peng Tingting, Han Mingshan, Le Wen, Peng Tingting, Xu Kaishou

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.

Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 May 18;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01619-7.


DOI:10.1186/s12984-025-01619-7
PMID:40383797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12087172/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) experience significant mobility and balance impairments. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), has emerged as a potential therapeutic intervention. Nevertheless, the safety and effectiveness of NIBS in children with CP remain uncertain and require further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NIBS in improving mobility and balance function in children with CP. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials written in English were searched in five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest), from the first available records in each database to April 2024. Statistical analysis focused on outcomes related to mobility and balance function immediately following intervention and one-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies encompassing 346 children with CP, aged 3-14 years, were included. The meta-analysis indicated that NIBS is safe and well-tolerated [Risk Difference = 0.16, 95% CI - 0.01-0.33], with a low incidence of adverse events. Significant improvements were observed in mobility post-intervention and at one-month follow-up, particularly in Gross Motor Function Measure scores [standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.47 to 0.63, P < 0.05]. Gait parameters, including gait velocity (SMD = 1.28, P < 0.01) and stride length (SMD = 0.70, P = 0.01) showed immediate improvements. However, no significant improvements were found in balance post-tDCS or at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of NIBS as a safe and feasible tool for enhancing mobility in children with CP, demonstrating both immediate and sustained improvements in gait parameters such as velocity and stride length. However, the impact on balance remains inconclusive. Future research should focus on extending follow-up periods, increasing sample sizes, and exploring tailored stimulation protocols to better understand the long-term efficacy and optimal application of NIBS in pediatric populations.

摘要

背景:脑瘫(CP)患儿存在明显的运动和平衡障碍。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS),包括经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),已成为一种潜在的治疗干预手段。然而,NIBS对CP患儿的安全性和有效性仍不确定,需要进一步研究。本研究旨在评估NIBS改善CP患儿运动和平衡功能的安全性和有效性。 方法:在五个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus、科学网和ProQuest)中检索从每个数据库的首个可用记录到2024年4月以英文撰写的随机对照试验。统计分析集中于干预后及随访1个月时与运动和平衡功能相关的结果。 结果:共纳入16项研究,涉及346例3至14岁的CP患儿。荟萃分析表明,NIBS是安全且耐受性良好的[风险差异=0.16,95%可信区间-0.01至0.33],不良事件发生率较低。干预后及随访1个月时,运动功能有显著改善,尤其是在粗大运动功能测量评分方面[标准平均差(SMD)=0.47至0.63,P<0.05]。步态参数,包括步速(SMD=1.28,P<0.01)和步长(SMD=0.70,P=0.01)即刻改善。然而,tDCS后及随访时平衡功能未见显著改善。 结论:我们的研究结果支持将NIBS作为增强CP患儿运动能力的一种安全可行的工具,在步速和步长等步态参数方面显示出即刻和持续的改善。然而,对平衡的影响仍不明确。未来的研究应侧重于延长随访时间、增加样本量以及探索个性化的刺激方案,以更好地了解NIBS在儿科人群中的长期疗效和最佳应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/a97c0e2ac54b/12984_2025_1619_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/0c50be5e9b87/12984_2025_1619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/f2414dfd9c8b/12984_2025_1619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/8efba07bcc2c/12984_2025_1619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/4fd298c6ade5/12984_2025_1619_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/547341029c4d/12984_2025_1619_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/733fa71e9b51/12984_2025_1619_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/8020a14b79d5/12984_2025_1619_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/9eb027479711/12984_2025_1619_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/a97c0e2ac54b/12984_2025_1619_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/0c50be5e9b87/12984_2025_1619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/f2414dfd9c8b/12984_2025_1619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/8efba07bcc2c/12984_2025_1619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/4fd298c6ade5/12984_2025_1619_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/547341029c4d/12984_2025_1619_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/733fa71e9b51/12984_2025_1619_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/8020a14b79d5/12984_2025_1619_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/9eb027479711/12984_2025_1619_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6f/12087172/a97c0e2ac54b/12984_2025_1619_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Safety and effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation on mobility and balance function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025-5-18

[2]
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Rehabilitation of Pediatric Motor Disorders Following Brain Injury: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019-5-10

[3]
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Effectiveness on Gait, Balance, and Motor Functions in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2025-5-14

[4]
Non-invasive brain stimulation for upper extremity dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transl Pediatr. 2025-2-28

[5]
Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on motor function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023-1-12

[6]
Efficacy and safety of noninvasive brain stimulation for patients with cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Neurol. 2023-10

[7]
The cognitive effect of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024-6-27

[8]
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-16

[9]
Safety and efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for the upper extremities in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024-5

[10]
Examining the effectiveness of motor imagery combined with non-invasive brain stimulation for upper limb recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024-11-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation in combination with antidepressants in adolescents with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Psychiatry. 2024-2-15

[2]
Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-assisted training on lower limb motor function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

BMC Pediatr. 2024-2-22

[3]
The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Front Aging Neurosci. 2024-2-2

[4]
Safety and efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for the upper extremities in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024-5

[5]
Proteomic changes of the bilateral M1 and spinal cord in hemiplegic cerebral palsy mouse: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy.

Behav Brain Res. 2023-8-24

[6]
Effects of Dual Task Training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

Dev Neurorehabil. 2023-7

[7]
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function and Performance in Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023-10

[8]
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation versus Virtual Reality on Gait for Children with Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Children (Basel). 2023-1-27

[9]
Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis.

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022-12

[10]
Therapeutic benefits of noninvasive somatosensory cortex stimulation on cortical plasticity and somatosensory function: A systematic review.

Eur J Neurosci. 2022-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索