Aksamitiene Edita, Park Jaena, Marjanovic Marina, Boppart Stephen A
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
NIH/NIBIB P41 Center for Label-Free Imaging and Multiscale Biophotonics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
J Extracell Vesicles. 2025 May;14(5):e70087. doi: 10.1002/jev2.70087.
The magnitude of combined analytical errors of urinary extracellular vesicle (uEV) preparation and measurement techniques (CV) has not been thoroughly investigated to determine whether it exceeds biological variations. We utilized technical replicates of human urine to assess the repeatability of uEV concentration and size measurements by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) following differential velocity centrifugation (DC), silicon carbide, or polyethylene glycol uEV isolation methods. The DC method attained the highest precision. Consequently, DC-derived uEV size, most abundant protein levels, and optical redox ratio (ORR) were further assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), immunoblotting or multi-photon (SLAM) microscopy. Procedural errors primarily affected uEV counting and uEV-associated protein quantification, while instrumental errors contributed most to the total variability of NTA- and DLS-mediated uEV sizing processes. The intra-individual variability (CV) of uEV counts assessed by NTA was smaller than inter-individual variability (CV), resulting in an estimated index of individuality IOI < 0.6, suggesting that personalized reference interval (RI) is more suitable for interpretation of changes in subject's test results. Population-based RI was more appropriate for ORR (IOI > 1.4). The analytical performance of DC-NTA and DC-SLAM techniques met optimal CV < 0.5 × CV criteria, indicating their suitability for further testing in clinical laboratory settings.
尿细胞外囊泡(uEV)制备和测量技术的综合分析误差幅度(CV)尚未得到充分研究,以确定其是否超过生物学变异。我们利用人类尿液的技术重复样本,通过差速离心(DC)、碳化硅或聚乙二醇uEV分离方法,评估纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)对uEV浓度和大小测量的可重复性。DC方法获得了最高的精度。因此,通过动态光散射(DLS)、免疫印迹或多光子(SLAM)显微镜进一步评估了DC衍生的uEV大小、最丰富的蛋白质水平和光学氧化还原比(ORR)。程序误差主要影响uEV计数和与uEV相关的蛋白质定量,而仪器误差对NTA和DLS介导的uEV大小测定过程的总变异性贡献最大。通过NTA评估的uEV计数的个体内变异性(CV)小于个体间变异性(CV),导致个体性指数IOI估计值<0.6,这表明个性化参考区间(RI)更适合解释受试者检测结果的变化。基于人群的RI更适合ORR(IOI>1.4)。DC-NTA和DC-SLAM技术的分析性能符合最佳CV<0.5×CV标准,表明它们适合在临床实验室环境中进行进一步检测。