• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提出磁共振慢扩散指标的基本原理及其概念验证测试表明,脾实质和肝细胞癌的扩散速度比肝实质更快。

The rationale for proposing a magnetic resonance slow diffusion metric and its proof-of-concept testing showing spleen parenchyma and hepatocellular carcinoma have faster diffusion than liver parenchyma.

作者信息

Xu Fan-Yi, Xiao Ben-Heng, Wáng Yì Xiáng J

机构信息

Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):3792-3806. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-537. Epub 2025 Apr 10.

DOI:10.21037/qims-2025-537
PMID:40384643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084736/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The liver and spleen have a similar amount of blood perfusion, and the spleen is waterier than the liver. The spleen tissue has a higher contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) extracellular volume fraction than the liver. The spleen has been reported to have a much lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-perfusion fraction (PF), and IVIM-D than those of the liver, which appears to be unreasonable. As hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are mostly associated with increased blood supply and increased proportion of arterial blood supply and with edema, HCC has been reported to have a lower ADC, lower IVIM-PF, and lower IVIM-D than liver parenchyma, which appears to be unreasonable. Cysts are known to have a longer T2 and a higher ADC than hemangiomas. Due to the 'flushing' of blood flow inside the hemangioma, we hypothesize that the actual diffusion of hemangioma liquid is faster than the more 'static' liquid of the cysts. As ADC measure is heavily affected by T2 and in order to minimize the T2 effect, we propose a new metric reflecting tissue slow diffusion which is termed 'slow diffusion coefficient (SDC)': SDC = [S( ) - S( )]/( - ), where and refers to a high -value (e.g., 400 s/mm for liver) and a higher -value (e.g., 600 s/mm) respectively, where S( ) and S( ) denote the corresponding diffusion weighted image signal intensity.

METHODS

This study utilized a random selection of authors' historical liver IVIM magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. For 1.5T data, SDC was calculated with =600 and 800 s/mm images. For 3.0T data, SDC was calculated with =400 and 600 s/mm images. With 1.5T data, SDC was calculated for 10 healthy volunteer cases' liver and spleen parenchyma, as well as two simple liver cysts and their corresponding liver parenchyma. With 3.0T data, SDC was calculated for 14 cases' liver and spleen parenchyma, as well as 13 HCC masses, 9 simple liver cysts, 13 hemangiomas and their corresponding liver parenchyma. As diffusion metrics can be only measured with MRI thus external validation is not possible, the measures of liver parenchyma were used to normalize the measures of spleen, HCC, cyst, and hemangioma, and the ratios were expressed in median value.

RESULTS

The median ratio of SDC/SDC was 2.47 for 1.5T data and 1.97 for 3.0T data. Two cysts at 1.5T had a median SDC/SDC ratio of 2.92. For 3.0T data, the median ratios of SDC/SDC, SDC/SDC, SDC/SDC were 2.83, 4.23, and 5.37, respectively. However, the ADC/ADC ratios were always <0.81 even when calculated with various combinations of high -values.

CONCLUSIONS

The spleen has a faster diffusion than the liver, HCCs have a faster diffusion than the adjacent liver parenchyma, and hemangiomas have a faster diffusion than simple cysts. Although it is known that cysts have a substantially longer T2 than hemangiomas, SDC of hemangioma was higher than that of cysts, suggesting 'T2 effect' is minimized for SDC.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/e6a6b16f8159/qims-15-05-3792-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/69bb2a4fbaba/qims-15-05-3792-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/73f6c5c78a03/qims-15-05-3792-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/09320139c5e7/qims-15-05-3792-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/b26e60442405/qims-15-05-3792-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/f7c78555d817/qims-15-05-3792-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/3ba438ffb339/qims-15-05-3792-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/081971dec541/qims-15-05-3792-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/c83de224ade4/qims-15-05-3792-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/de388902c41a/qims-15-05-3792-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/36abf18a3c16/qims-15-05-3792-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/fc39a737a394/qims-15-05-3792-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/e6a6b16f8159/qims-15-05-3792-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/69bb2a4fbaba/qims-15-05-3792-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/73f6c5c78a03/qims-15-05-3792-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/09320139c5e7/qims-15-05-3792-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/b26e60442405/qims-15-05-3792-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/f7c78555d817/qims-15-05-3792-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/3ba438ffb339/qims-15-05-3792-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/081971dec541/qims-15-05-3792-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/c83de224ade4/qims-15-05-3792-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/de388902c41a/qims-15-05-3792-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/36abf18a3c16/qims-15-05-3792-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/fc39a737a394/qims-15-05-3792-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5930/12084736/e6a6b16f8159/qims-15-05-3792-f12.jpg
摘要

背景

肝脏和脾脏的血流灌注量相似,且脾脏比肝脏含水量更高。脾脏组织的对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)细胞外容积分数高于肝脏。据报道,脾脏的表观扩散系数(ADC)、体素内不相干运动(IVIM)灌注分数(PF)和IVIM-D均远低于肝脏,这似乎不合理。由于肝细胞癌(HCC)大多伴有血供增加、动脉血供比例增加以及水肿,据报道HCC的ADC、IVIM-PF和IVIM-D均低于肝实质,这似乎也不合理。已知囊肿的T2弛豫时间长于血管瘤,且ADC值高于血管瘤。由于血管瘤内部存在血流“冲洗”现象,我们推测血管瘤内液体的实际扩散速度比囊肿中更“静止”的液体更快。由于ADC测量受T2影响较大,为尽量减少T2效应,我们提出一种反映组织缓慢扩散的新指标,称为“缓慢扩散系数(SDC)”:SDC = [S( ) - S( )]/( - ),其中 和 分别指高 值(如肝脏为400 s/mm)和更高 值(如600 s/mm),S( )和S( )分别表示相应扩散加权图像的信号强度。

方法

本研究随机选取了作者既往的肝脏IVIM磁共振成像(MRI)数据。对于1.5T数据,使用 =600和800 s/mm的图像计算SDC。对于3.0T数据,使用 =400和600 s/mm的图像计算SDC。对于1.5T数据,计算了10例健康志愿者肝脏和脾脏实质、2个单纯性肝囊肿及其相应肝实质的SDC。对于3.0T数据,计算了14例肝脏和脾脏实质、13个HCC肿块、9个单纯性肝囊肿、13个血管瘤及其相应肝实质的SDC。由于扩散指标只能通过MRI测量,因此无法进行外部验证,故用肝实质的测量值对脾脏、HCC、囊肿和血管瘤的测量值进行标准化,并以中位数表示比值。

结果

1.5T数据的SDC/SDC中位数比值为2.47,3.0T数据为1.97。1.5T的2个囊肿的SDC/SDC中位数比值为2.92。对于3.0T数据,SDC/SDC、SDC/SDC、SDC/SDC的中位数比值分别为2.83、4.23和5.37。然而,即使采用各种高 值组合计算,ADC/ADC比值始终<0.81。

结论

脾脏的扩散速度比肝脏快,HCC的扩散速度比相邻肝实质快,血管瘤的扩散速度比单纯囊肿快。尽管已知囊肿的T2弛豫时间比血管瘤长得多,但血管瘤的SDC高于囊肿,表明SDC可将“T2效应”降至最低。

相似文献

1
The rationale for proposing a magnetic resonance slow diffusion metric and its proof-of-concept testing showing spleen parenchyma and hepatocellular carcinoma have faster diffusion than liver parenchyma.提出磁共振慢扩散指标的基本原理及其概念验证测试表明,脾实质和肝细胞癌的扩散速度比肝实质更快。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):3792-3806. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-537. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Influences of the second motion probing gradient -value and T2 relaxation time on magnetic resonance diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) calculation: the examples of liver, spleen, and liver simple cyst.第二次运动探测梯度值和T2弛豫时间对磁共振扩散衍生的“血管密度”(DDVD)计算的影响:以肝脏、脾脏和肝单纯囊肿为例。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):74-87. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2411. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Diagnosis of liver hemangioma using magnetic resonance diffusion-derived vessel density (DDVD) pixelwise map: a preliminary descriptive study.利用磁共振扩散衍生血管密度(DDVD)逐像素图诊断肝脏血管瘤:一项初步描述性研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8064-8082. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1837. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
4
Hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters at 3.0T.肝细胞癌:3.0T 磁共振成像下表观扩散系数和体素内不相干运动参数的短期可重复性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;41(1):149-56. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24538. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
5
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Is there a correlation with flow and perfusion metrics obtained with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI?肝细胞癌的体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像:与动态对比增强MRI获得的血流和灌注指标是否存在相关性?
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Oct;44(4):856-64. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25194. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Age and gender differences of normative values of spleen diffusion MRI parameters.脾脏扩散磁共振成像参数正常数值的年龄和性别差异
Rofo. 2025 May;197(5):535-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2357-9741. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
Perfusion of hepatocellular carcinomas measured by diffusion-derived vessel density biomarker: Higher hepatocellular carcinoma perfusion than earlier intravoxel incoherent motion reports.基于扩散衍生血管密度标志物测量的肝细胞癌灌注:高于早期体素内不相干运动报告的肝细胞癌灌注。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Jun;37(6):e5125. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5125. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of non-complicated hepatic cysts: Value of 3T computed diffusion-weighted imaging.非复杂性肝囊肿的扩散加权磁共振成像:3T计算机扩散加权成像的价值
Eur J Radiol Open. 2016 Jul 18;3:138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.07.001. eCollection 2016.
9
IVIM Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Liver at 3.0T: Comparison with 1.5T.3.0T磁共振成像下肝脏的体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像:与1.5T的比较
Eur J Radiol Open. 2015;2:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2015.08.001.
10
Diagnostic value of diffusion weighted MRI and ADC in differential diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma of the liver.磁共振扩散加权成像及表观扩散系数在肝脏海绵状血管瘤鉴别诊断中的诊断价值
Afr Health Sci. 2016 Mar;16(1):227-33. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i1.30.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI slow diffusion coefficient (SDC) shows liver pyogenic abscess has faster diffusion than adjacent liver parenchyma.磁共振成像慢扩散系数(SDC)显示,肝脓肿的扩散速度比相邻肝实质更快。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):6547-6551. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-1010. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
Lower diffusion-derived vessel density (DDVD) measure of liver focal nodular hyperplasia than those of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis allows potential differential diagnosis: quantitative and semi-quantitative analyses of two-center data.肝脏局灶性结节性增生的扩散衍生血管密度(DDVD)测量值低于肝细胞癌和肝转移瘤,这有助于进行潜在的鉴别诊断:两中心数据的定量和半定量分析。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;16(3):1144-1156. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2025-59. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The impacts of time of echo (TE) and time of repetition (TR) on diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) measurement: examples of liver, spleen, and hepatocellular carcinoma.回波时间(TE)和重复时间(TR)对扩散衍生的“血管密度”(DDVD)测量的影响:肝脏、脾脏和肝细胞癌的示例
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):3771-3778. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-270. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
An explanation for the triphasic dependency of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on T2 relaxation time: the multiple T2 compartments model.表观扩散系数(ADC)对T2弛豫时间的三相依赖性解释:多T2成分模型。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):3779-3791. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-195. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Assessing parotid gland tumor perfusion with a new imaging biomarker DDVD (diffusion-derived vessel density): promising initial results.
用一种新的成像生物标志物DDVD(扩散衍生血管密度)评估腮腺肿瘤灌注:初步结果令人鼓舞。
Rofo. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1055/a-2543-3305.
4
MRI signal simulation of liver (diffusion derived 'vessel density') with multiple compartments diffusion model.基于多房室扩散模型的肝脏MRI信号模拟(扩散衍生的“血管密度”)
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1710-1718. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2693. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
High performance of the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging biomarker diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) for separating placentas associated with pre-eclampsia from placentas in normal pregnancy.扩散磁共振成像生物标志物扩散衍生的“血管密度”(DDVD)在区分与子痫前期相关的胎盘和正常妊娠胎盘方面具有高性能。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):1-14. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2412. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
6
Influences of the second motion probing gradient -value and T2 relaxation time on magnetic resonance diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) calculation: the examples of liver, spleen, and liver simple cyst.第二次运动探测梯度值和T2弛豫时间对磁共振扩散衍生的“血管密度”(DDVD)计算的影响:以肝脏、脾脏和肝单纯囊肿为例。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):74-87. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2411. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
7
Diagnosis of liver hemangioma using magnetic resonance diffusion-derived vessel density (DDVD) pixelwise map: a preliminary descriptive study.利用磁共振扩散衍生血管密度(DDVD)逐像素图诊断肝脏血管瘤:一项初步描述性研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8064-8082. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1837. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
8
Natural course of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change after brain ischemic stroke: an alternative explanation by the triphasic relationship between T2 and ADC.脑缺血性中风后表观扩散系数(ADC)变化的自然病程:基于T2与ADC三相关系的另一种解释
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):9848-9855. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2383. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
9
Higher perfusion of rectum carcinoma relative to tumor-free rectal wall: quantification by a new imaging biomarker diffusion-derived vessel density (DDVD).直肠癌相对于无肿瘤直肠壁的灌注增加:通过一种新的影像生物标志物——扩散衍生血管密度(DDVD)进行量化。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 May 1;14(5):3264-3274. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-406. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Underestimation of liver hemangioma perfusion fraction by standard intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.标准体素内不相干运动扩散磁共振成像对肝脏血管瘤灌注分数的低估
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):2128-2135. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1651. Epub 2024 Jan 12.