Sanchez-Youngman Shannon, Jacquez Belkis, Adsul Prajakta, Dickson Elizabeth, Akintobi Tabia Henry, Hoffman LaShawn, Rosas Lisa G, Gay Starla, Mendoza Jason A, Mapes Diane, Oetzel John, Nease Donald, Wallerstein Nina
University of New Mexico, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 19;9(1):e80. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.51. eCollection 2025.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and patient/ community engaged research (P/CEnR) are shown to be effective approaches that improve health inequities, particularly among disadvantaged populations. While the science of CBPR demonstrates promising partnering practices that lead to effective interventions, there are institutional and structural barriers to creating and sustaining patient/community research within academic health centers (AHCs). As the field matures, there is a growing need to enhance patient/community leadership so that communities can set their own research agendas and priorities.
Engage for Equity PLUS sought to address these challenges by implementing an engagement intervention aimed at transforming AHCs through supporting champion teams of academic, community, and patient partners to strengthen research infrastructures for P/CEnR. This paper uses a qualitative, case study analysis to describe how E2PLUS enabled champion teams at Stanford School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, and Morehouse School of Medicine to pursue institutional change strategies through coaching, workshops, contextual data analysis, and a community of practice.
This paper describes key themes of how E2Plus helped identify targets of change by a) using institutional data collection as core to generating critical consciousness of contextual conditions; b) implementing feasible E2PLUS strategies to leverage conditions for catalyzing a champion team for advocacy and achievable actions; c) identifying the critical role of patients/community members in stimulating change; and d) the role of continual collective reflection.
We discuss the overall implications for E2 PLUS for other AHCs working toward sustainable community/patient engaged research policies and practices.
基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)和患者/社区参与式研究(P/CEnR)被证明是改善健康不平等现象的有效方法,尤其是在弱势群体中。虽然CBPR科学展示了有望带来有效干预措施的合作实践,但在学术健康中心(AHCs)内开展并维持患者/社区研究存在制度和结构障碍。随着该领域的成熟,越来越需要增强患者/社区的领导力,以便社区能够设定自己的研究议程和优先事项。
“公平参与升级版”(Engage for Equity PLUS)旨在通过实施一项参与式干预措施来应对这些挑战,该干预措施旨在通过支持由学术、社区和患者合作伙伴组成的冠军团队来转变AHCs,以加强P/CEnR的研究基础设施。本文采用定性案例研究分析方法,描述了“公平参与升级版”如何通过指导、研讨会、情境数据分析和实践社区,使斯坦福大学医学院、弗雷德·哈钦森癌症研究中心/华盛顿大学癌症联盟以及莫尔豪斯医学院的冠军团队推行制度变革策略。
本文描述了“公平参与升级版”如何通过以下方式帮助确定变革目标的关键主题:a)将机构数据收集作为核心,以培养对情境条件的批判性意识;b)实施可行的“公平参与升级版”策略,利用条件促成倡导变革的冠军团队并采取可实现的行动;c)确定患者/社区成员在推动变革中的关键作用;d)持续集体反思的作用。
我们讨论了“公平参与升级版”对其他致力于实现可持续社区/患者参与式研究政策和实践的AHCs的总体影响。