Dong Liqin, Li Wei, Niu Xi, Luan Lixia, Hui Shuning
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University Xi'an 710003, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Obstetrics, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):2800-2808. doi: 10.62347/HBLW4532. eCollection 2025.
To investigate the correlation between uric acid (UA), lipid levels, and preeclampsia (PE), as well as their effect on pregnancy outcome in women in late pregnancy.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from 126 pregnant women with PE who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University from June 2021 to January 2024 (research group). Additionally, clinical data from 130 healthy pregnant women who gave birth during the same period were served as controls. General information, UA levels, blood lipid levels [total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), free fatty acids (FFA), lipoprotein-a (Lp-a), apolipoprotein-a1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), LDL-C/HDL-C, and ApoA1/ApoB] and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was used to identify the influencing factors for PE. The predictive value of UA and lipid levels for PE diagnosis and prognosis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of age, parity, mode of delivery, neonatal gender, gestational cardiac disease, HDL-C, FFA, ApoA1, or ApoA1/ApoB (all P>0.05). However, the research group exhibited significantly higher body mass index (BMI), prevalence of gestational diabetes, and gestational hypertension, UA, TC, TG, LDL-C, Lp-a, ApoB, and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio compared to the control group, but lower neonatal weight (all P<0.05). Furthermore, the research group had a higher incidence of gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage, fetal growth retardation, preterm delivery, and neonatal asphyxia (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified BMI, neonatal weight, UA, TC, TG, and LDL-C as independent influencing factors for PE. ROC curve analysis demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for BMI (AUC=0.835), neonatal weight (AUC=0.755), UA (AUC=0.765), TC (AUC=0.706), and LDL-C (AUC=0.792) in predicting PE.
Maternal BMI, neonatal weight, serum UA, TC, TG, and LDL-C levels are risk factors for the development of PE. Among these, BMI, neonatal weight, serum UA, TC, and LDL-C levels have a high predictive value for PE and can serve as valuable indicators for its early prediction and management.
探讨尿酸(UA)、血脂水平与子痫前期(PE)之间的相关性,以及它们对晚期妊娠女性妊娠结局的影响。
对2021年6月至2024年1月在西安医学院第一附属医院住院的126例PE孕妇的临床资料进行回顾性分析(研究组)。另外,将同期分娩的130例健康孕妇的临床资料作为对照组。比较两组的一般资料、UA水平、血脂水平[总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、游离脂肪酸(FFA)、脂蛋白-a(Lp-a)、载脂蛋白-a1(ApoA1)、载脂蛋白B(ApoB)、LDL-C/HDL-C和ApoA1/ApoB]及妊娠结局。采用logistic回归模型确定PE的影响因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估UA和血脂水平对PE诊断及预后的预测价值。
两组在年龄、产次、分娩方式、新生儿性别、妊娠期心脏病、HDL-C、FFA、ApoA1或ApoA1/ApoB方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。然而,与对照组相比,研究组的体重指数(BMI)、妊娠期糖尿病患病率、妊娠期高血压、UA、TC、TG、LDL-C、Lp-a、ApoB及LDL-C/HDL-C比值显著更高,但新生儿体重更低(均P<0.05)。此外,研究组妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠期高血压、产后出血、胎儿生长受限、早产及新生儿窒息的发生率更高(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析确定BMI、新生儿体重、UA、TC、TG和LDL-C为PE的独立影响因素。ROC曲线分析显示,BMI(AUC=0.835)、新生儿体重(AUC=0.755)、UA(AUC=0.765)、TC(AUC=0.706)和LDL-C(AUC=0.792)对PE的诊断准确性较高。
孕妇BMI、新生儿体重、血清UA、TC、TG和LDL-C水平是发生PE的危险因素。其中,BMI、新生儿体重、血清UA、TC和LDL-C水平对PE具有较高的预测价值,可作为其早期预测和管理的重要指标。