Zaglauer Katharina, Kunsorg Andrea, Jakob Vanessa, Görg Lara, Oehlschlägel Arndt, Riedel Rainer, Marschall Ursula, Welsink Dieter, Schuhmacher Horst, Wittmann Maria
Rheinische Hochschule Köln, University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Pain Res Manag. 2025 May 10;2025:6693678. doi: 10.1155/prm/6693678. eCollection 2025.
In this study, an intervention group (multimodal therapy for chronic back pain) and a control group (standard outpatient treatment) were compared with regard to the primary endpoint of pain (NRS) at rest and the secondary endpoints pain (NRS) during movement, general health status (Short Form 12 (SF-12)), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), pain disability index (PDI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Germany (HADS-D), and Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire for Measuring Back Pain-Related Disability (FFbH-R). The total patient cohort of this prospective observational multicenter study consisted of 477 patients who were initially enrolled in the study from January 2019 to September 2020. The intervention group received physiotherapy, pain therapy (pain-therapeutic, body-related, and patient-specific treatment), and control examinations from the responsible physician in a 6-month structured interdisciplinary program. The evaluation points used in the analysis are the baseline survey, 6 months and 12 months after the start of the study. A total of 477 patients (243 in the intervention group and 234 in the control group) were included in the analysis; 42 patients in the intervention group deviated from the eligibility criteria due to insufficient adherence to study participation. Nonetheless, they were included in the analysis in line with the ITT principle. The primary endpoint, pain at rest (NRS), showed greater reductions in the intervention group compared to the control group, with mean differences of -0.492 (95% CI: [-0.866, -0.118], = 0.010) at 6 months (EVA 3) and -0.463 (95% CI: [-0.837, -0.089], = 0.015) at 12 months (EVA 5), respectively. Regarding the secondary endpoints, pain during movement exhibited a significantly greater reduction in the intervention group compared to the control group ( < 0.001). Quality of life, measured via the EQ-5D-5L index, improved significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group, as did functional capacity (FFbH-R) and physical health (SF-12 KSK) ( < 0.001). In contrast, mental health (SF-12 PSK) declined significantly during the intervention ( < 0.001). Disability (PDI) exhibited a significantly greater reduction in the intervention group compared to the control group ( < 0.001), whereas anxiety and depression levels (HADS-D) showed only slight changes in both groups, with anxiety being significant at = 0.0164 and depression not significant at = 0.1093. These results underscore the intervention's effectiveness across multiple health dimensions, particularly pain reduction and quality of life. Multimodal pain therapy over a 6-month period is an effective intervention to improve the perception of pain at rest and during movement while enhancing the subjective quality of life. These benefits persist beyond the therapy period, underscoring the intervention's lasting impact. German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015800.
在本研究中,对干预组(慢性背痛的多模式治疗)和对照组(标准门诊治疗)在静息时疼痛的主要终点(数字评分量表[NRS])以及运动时疼痛(NRS)、总体健康状况(简明健康调查简表12[SF-12])、健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)、疼痛残疾指数(PDI)、德国医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS-D)和汉诺威测量背痛相关残疾的功能能力问卷(FFbH-R)等次要终点方面进行了比较。这项前瞻性观察性多中心研究的患者总队列由477名患者组成,他们于2019年1月至2020年9月首次纳入该研究。干预组在一个为期6个月的结构化跨学科项目中接受了物理治疗、疼痛治疗(疼痛治疗、身体相关和针对患者的治疗)以及责任医师的对照检查。分析中使用的评估点为基线调查、研究开始后6个月和12个月。共有477名患者(干预组243名,对照组234名)纳入分析;干预组中有42名患者因未充分遵守研究参与要求而不符合纳入标准。尽管如此,根据意向性分析原则,他们仍被纳入分析。主要终点,即静息时疼痛(NRS),与对照组相比,干预组的降低幅度更大,在6个月(EVA 3)时平均差异为-0.492(95%置信区间:[-0.866, -0.118],P = 0.010),在12个月(EVA 5)时平均差异为-0.463(95%置信区间:[-0.837, -0.089],P = 0.015)。关于次要终点,与对照组相比,干预组运动时疼痛的降低幅度显著更大(P < 0.001)。通过EQ-5D-5L指数测量的生活质量,干预组的改善显著大于对照组,功能能力(FFbH-R)和身体健康(SF-12 KSK)也是如此(P < 0.001)。相比之下,心理健康(SF-12 PSK)在干预期间显著下降(P < 0.001)。与对照组相比,干预组的残疾(PDI)降低幅度显著更大(P < 0.001),而焦虑和抑郁水平(HADS-D)在两组中仅略有变化,焦虑在P = 0.0164时具有显著性,抑郁在P = 0.