Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗与长效地塞米松联合应用对初治与难治性视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿患者的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签干预性研究。

Effect of simultaneous intravitreal ranibizumab and extended-release dexamethasone injection on patients with naïve versus refractory retinal vein occlusion macular edema: a prospective, multicenter, and interventional open-label study.

作者信息

Sun Yao-Yao, Meng Jie, Li Shan-Shan, Xiao Qin, Zhang Tian-Zi, Miao Heng, Zhao Ming-Wei, Qi Hui-Jun

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

Beijing Key Laboratory of Ocular Disease and Optometry Science, Beijing100034, China.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 May 18;18(5):860-867. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.05.11. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and extended-release dexamethasone injections (Dex-I) in naïve and refractory patients with retinal vein occlusion macular edema (RVO-ME).

METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional, and open-label clinical trial. There were two groups: naïve and refractory patients (received ≥5 times of previous IVR within one year prior to enrollment) enrolled. Patients received IVR and Dex-I concurrently and re-combination therapy was required if one or more retreatment criteria were met. IVR and Dex-I were given pro re nata (PRN). The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured as main outcomes.

RESULTS

Totally 63 patients (63 eyes) completed the entire follow-up (31 naïve and 32 refractory patients). At month 12, the change in BCVA was greater in the naïve group than in the refractory group [19.67±11.7 (95%CI: 15.03, 24.31) letters 11.74±11.18 (95%CI: 7.32, 16.16) letters, =0.014). There was no difference between the two groups of mean macular thickness reduction [364.26±215.29 (95%CI: 279.09, 449.43) µm 410.19±204.34 (95%CI: 329.35, 491.02) µm, =0.43). The mean co-injection numbers were 2.52±0.58 (95%CI: 2.29, 2.75) and 2.33±0.55 (95%CI: 2.11, 2.55) in both groups (=0.24), respectively. The retreatment interval was 115.81±13.79 d (95%CI: 110.36, 121.27) and 122.74±14.06 d (95%CI: 119.93, 133.56) in both groups (=0.073). There was no significant difference in the incidence of glaucoma or the progression of cataracts between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In both naïve and refractory RVO-ME patients, IVR combined with Dex-I is effective. The initial combination therapy for naïve patients demonstrates more efficient improvement in BCVA and may reduce total injection numbers compared to refractory patients.

摘要

目的

评估玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(IVR)与地塞米松缓释注射剂(Dex-I)联合应用于初治及难治性视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、干预性、开放标签的临床试验。分为两组:初治患者和难治性患者(入选前一年内接受过≥5次IVR治疗)。患者同时接受IVR和Dex-I治疗,若满足一项或多项再治疗标准,则需要进行联合治疗。IVR和Dex-I根据需要使用(PRN)。测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)的平均变化作为主要结果。

结果

共有63例患者(63只眼)完成了整个随访(31例初治患者和32例难治性患者)。在第12个月时,初治组的BCVA变化大于难治性组[19.67±11.7(95%CI:15.03,24.31)字母 11.74±11.18(95%CI:7.32,16.16)字母,P = 0.014]。两组黄斑平均厚度降低无差异[364.26±215.29(95%CI:279.09,449.43)µm 410.19±204.34(95%CI:329.35,491.02)µm,P = 0.43]。两组的平均联合注射次数分别为2.52±0.58(95%CI:2.29,2.75)和2.33±0.55(95%CI:2.11,2.55)(P = 0.24)。两组的再治疗间隔分别为115.81±13.79 d(95%CI:110.36,121.27)和122.74±14.06 d(95%CI:119.93,133.56)(P = 0.073)。两组在青光眼发病率或白内障进展方面无显著差异。

结论

在初治及难治性RVO-ME患者中,IVR联合Dex-I均有效。与难治性患者相比,初治患者的初始联合治疗在BCVA改善方面更有效,且可能减少总注射次数。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Novel pharmaceuticals for the management of retinal vein occlusion and linked disorders.治疗视网膜静脉阻塞及相关疾病的新型药物。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jul-Dec;16(11):1125-1139. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2277882. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
8
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) guideline: executive summary.视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)指南:执行摘要。
Eye (Lond). 2022 May;36(5):909-912. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02007-4. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验