Sun Yao-Yao, Meng Jie, Li Shan-Shan, Xiao Qin, Zhang Tian-Zi, Miao Heng, Zhao Ming-Wei, Qi Hui-Jun
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Ocular Disease and Optometry Science, Beijing100034, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 May 18;18(5):860-867. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.05.11. eCollection 2025.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and extended-release dexamethasone injections (Dex-I) in naïve and refractory patients with retinal vein occlusion macular edema (RVO-ME).
This was a prospective, interventional, and open-label clinical trial. There were two groups: naïve and refractory patients (received ≥5 times of previous IVR within one year prior to enrollment) enrolled. Patients received IVR and Dex-I concurrently and re-combination therapy was required if one or more retreatment criteria were met. IVR and Dex-I were given pro re nata (PRN). The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured as main outcomes.
Totally 63 patients (63 eyes) completed the entire follow-up (31 naïve and 32 refractory patients). At month 12, the change in BCVA was greater in the naïve group than in the refractory group [19.67±11.7 (95%CI: 15.03, 24.31) letters 11.74±11.18 (95%CI: 7.32, 16.16) letters, =0.014). There was no difference between the two groups of mean macular thickness reduction [364.26±215.29 (95%CI: 279.09, 449.43) µm 410.19±204.34 (95%CI: 329.35, 491.02) µm, =0.43). The mean co-injection numbers were 2.52±0.58 (95%CI: 2.29, 2.75) and 2.33±0.55 (95%CI: 2.11, 2.55) in both groups (=0.24), respectively. The retreatment interval was 115.81±13.79 d (95%CI: 110.36, 121.27) and 122.74±14.06 d (95%CI: 119.93, 133.56) in both groups (=0.073). There was no significant difference in the incidence of glaucoma or the progression of cataracts between the two groups.
In both naïve and refractory RVO-ME patients, IVR combined with Dex-I is effective. The initial combination therapy for naïve patients demonstrates more efficient improvement in BCVA and may reduce total injection numbers compared to refractory patients.
评估玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(IVR)与地塞米松缓释注射剂(Dex-I)联合应用于初治及难治性视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)患者的疗效和安全性。
这是一项前瞻性、干预性、开放标签的临床试验。分为两组:初治患者和难治性患者(入选前一年内接受过≥5次IVR治疗)。患者同时接受IVR和Dex-I治疗,若满足一项或多项再治疗标准,则需要进行联合治疗。IVR和Dex-I根据需要使用(PRN)。测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)的平均变化作为主要结果。
共有63例患者(63只眼)完成了整个随访(31例初治患者和32例难治性患者)。在第12个月时,初治组的BCVA变化大于难治性组[19.67±11.7(95%CI:15.03,24.31)字母 11.74±11.18(95%CI:7.32,16.16)字母,P = 0.014]。两组黄斑平均厚度降低无差异[364.26±215.29(95%CI:279.09,449.43)µm 410.19±204.34(95%CI:329.35,491.02)µm,P = 0.43]。两组的平均联合注射次数分别为2.52±0.58(95%CI:2.29,2.75)和2.33±0.55(95%CI:2.11,2.55)(P = 0.24)。两组的再治疗间隔分别为115.81±13.79 d(95%CI:110.36,121.27)和122.74±14.06 d(95%CI:119.93,133.56)(P = 0.073)。两组在青光眼发病率或白内障进展方面无显著差异。
在初治及难治性RVO-ME患者中,IVR联合Dex-I均有效。与难治性患者相比,初治患者的初始联合治疗在BCVA改善方面更有效,且可能减少总注射次数。