Smith Sophia, Scantling Dane R
Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 May 14;10(2):e001729. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001729. eCollection 2025.
Trauma care in the USA is fragmented, unequal, and millions of people lack adequate access to a trauma center. These inequities are the result of historic precedent, racial and socioeconomic discrimination, and the economics of trauma care. The fixed location of trauma centers may also fail to meet the needs of moving and changing populations. Further, the current methods of trauma center formation perpetuate existing inequity by leaving the pursuit of trauma center creation up to hospitals, resulting in verification and designation processes that are mostly reliant on financial capability rather than community need. This particularly impacts those who are socioeconomically vulnerable, as existing trauma centers may not be accessible to their communities and new centers may not seek to serve them. On the contrary, already well-resourced communities increasingly receive duplicative care. A thorough understanding of the interplay between trauma center designation, socioeconomic and geographic disparities in trauma care-and potential levers for change-is crucial in trauma systems planning for more equitable trauma care.
美国的创伤护理体系分散、不平等,数百万人无法充分利用创伤中心的资源。这些不公平现象是历史先例、种族和社会经济歧视以及创伤护理经济因素造成的。创伤中心的固定位置可能也无法满足流动和变化中的人群的需求。此外,目前创伤中心的设立方式延续了现有的不公平现象,因为创伤中心的创建由医院自行决定,导致认证和指定过程大多依赖财务能力而非社区需求。这对社会经济弱势群体的影响尤为严重,因为他们所在社区可能无法到达现有的创伤中心,而新的中心可能也无意为他们提供服务。相反,资源已经很充足的社区却越来越多地接受重复的护理。深入了解创伤中心指定、创伤护理中的社会经济和地理差异以及潜在的变革杠杆之间的相互作用,对于规划更公平的创伤护理的创伤系统至关重要。