Bateman Marcus, Swaile Heather, Tambe Amol
Derby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Hand Ther. 2025 May 15:17589983251336157. doi: 10.1177/17589983251336157.
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome (CuTS) is a common condition of the elbow that is often treated with surgical decompression of the ulnar nerve but evidence for optimal management is unclear. A previous Cochrane review from 2016 identified very limited evidence to guide conservative management, in particular, night splints. The aim of this systematic review was to update the evidence related to the effectiveness of night splints in the treatment of CuTS.
We conducted an electronic search on January 15th 2025 of the MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and CINAHL databases from the last 30 years, using a pre-defined protocol. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools, with certainty assessed using GRADE.
We identified only one randomised controlled trial (RCT), with high overall risk of bias, that compared night splints to a control arm of advice only. This under-powered trial with high loss to follow-up found no difference between groups. One additional RCT and three single-arm studies, all at high/serious/critical risk of bias, suggested the majority of patients with mild/moderate CuTS improve with night splinting but it is unclear whether the effect was due to treatment or time. Evidence certainty was very low.
We identified a paucity of evidence, of low quality, regarding night splinting. The evidence identified by this review is currently insufficient to determine whether night splints should be recommended for the treatment of CuTS and there is a need for a high-quality research trial comparing night splints to a control intervention.
肘管综合征(CuTS)是一种常见的肘部疾病,通常采用尺神经手术减压治疗,但最佳治疗方案的证据尚不清楚。2016年Cochrane的一项综述发现,指导保守治疗,尤其是夜间夹板治疗的证据非常有限。本系统综述的目的是更新有关夜间夹板治疗CuTS有效性的证据。
我们于2025年1月15日使用预定义方案对过去30年的MEDLINE、Embase、Emcare和CINAHL数据库进行了电子检索。使用RoB2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评估确定性。
我们仅发现一项随机对照试验(RCT),总体偏倚风险较高,该试验将夜间夹板与仅提供建议的对照组进行了比较。这项随访损失率高、样本量不足的试验发现两组之间没有差异。另一项RCT和三项单臂研究,所有研究的偏倚风险均为高/严重/关键,表明大多数轻度/中度CuTS患者通过夜间夹板治疗有所改善,但尚不清楚这种效果是由于治疗还是时间。证据确定性非常低。
我们发现关于夜间夹板治疗的证据很少,质量也很低。本综述所确定的证据目前不足以确定是否应推荐夜间夹板治疗CuTS,因此需要进行一项将夜间夹板与对照干预措施进行比较的高质量研究试验。