Ortiz Gonzalo, Ursino Florencia, Battiston Fernando, Messere Gabriela, Busoni Veronica, Neffa Rosana Solis, Bigliardi Roman, Mora Mabel, Toca Maria Del Carmen, Orsi Marina
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Nacional Alejandro Posadas Buenos Aires Argentina.
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires CABA Buenos Aires Argentina.
JPGN Rep. 2025 Feb 3;6(2):107-112. doi: 10.1002/jpr3.12169. eCollection 2025 May.
(1) To assess the predictive value of anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies (a-tTG) by chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) related to duodenal histology in children with suspected celiac disease (CD) and (2) to determine the cut-off value of a-tTG by CLIA that allows diagnosis of CD avoiding biopsy.
Retrospective, descriptive, observational study in children between 1 and 16 years of age, studied for CD. Patients with IgA deficiency and those on a gluten-free diet were excluded. Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for ≥10, 30, and 50 times the normal a-tTG (normal value [NV]) compared with histology, evaluated by blinded pathologists.
The total number of patients included was 262. The a-tTG IgA by CLIA with a cut-off point of 20 chemiluminescent units (CU) had a S of 99.5%, Sp, 10.26%, PPV, 86.38%, NPV, 80%. When a cut-off value of a-tTG ≥ 10 times NV (200 CU) was used, the S, Sp, PPV, and NPV were 65.4%, 69.23%, 94.2%, and 25.96%, respectively. Likewise, with a value ≥30 times NV (600 CU) the correlation with histology was 99.03%, reaching a PPV of 100% with a cut-off value ≥50 NV (1000 CU). Combining both methods a-tTG IgA + EMA IgA, we obtained similar results to the a-tTG IgA level for the proposed cut-off values.
We suggest that the use of 30 times the NV cutoff values would be the best predictor of which patients do not need a biopsy.
(1)评估化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)检测的抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶免疫球蛋白A(IgA)抗体(a-tTG)对疑似乳糜泻(CD)儿童十二指肠组织学的预测价值;(2)确定CLIA法检测a-tTG的临界值,以便在避免活检的情况下诊断CD。
对1至16岁因CD接受研究的儿童进行回顾性、描述性观察研究。排除IgA缺乏患者和采用无麸质饮食的患者。将a-tTG水平≥正常a-tTG(正常值[NV])的10倍、30倍和50倍时的敏感性(S)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)与组织学结果进行比较,由盲法病理学家进行评估。
纳入患者总数为262例。CLIA法检测的a-tTG IgA,临界值为20个化学发光单位(CU)时,S为99.5%,Sp为10.26%,PPV为86.38%,NPV为80%。当a-tTG临界值≥NV的10倍(200 CU)时,S、Sp、PPV和NPV分别为65.4%、69.23%、94.2%和25.96%。同样,当a-tTG水平≥NV的30倍(600 CU)时,与组织学的相关性为99.03%,临界值≥NV的50倍(1000 CU)时PPV达到100%。联合使用a-tTG IgA和EMA IgA这两种方法,对于所提议的临界值,我们获得了与a-tTG IgA水平相似的结果。
我们建议,采用NV的30倍作为临界值最有助于预测哪些患者无需进行活检。