Suppr超能文献

比较中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)及衍生NLR作为非小细胞肺癌一线免疫治疗预测生物标志物的研究:一项回顾性研究

Comparing neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and derived NLR as predictive biomarkers in first-line immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Longueville Elise, Dewolf Maxime, Dalstein Véronique, Durlach Anne, Vivien Alexandre, Nawrocki-Raby Béatrice, Polette Myriam, Deslée Gaëtan, Ancel Julien

机构信息

Respiratory Diseases Department, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.

INSERM UMR-S 1250, P3Cell, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.

出版信息

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):1212-1230. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-808. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant global health challenge due to its high prevalence and poor prognosis despite treatment advancements, including immunotherapy. While programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a commonly used biomarker, its limitations justify exploration of alternative markers like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and derived NLR (dNLR). This retrospective study aims to directly compare NLR, ANC and dNLR as predictive biomarkers in first-line NSCLC immunotherapy, shedding light on their prognostic implications and potential clinical utility.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 70 consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, treated in first-line with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between September 2015 and March 2023 at the University Hospital of Reims, France. Baseline clinical characteristics and hematological values were collected, and survival analysis, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was performed based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. NLR and dNLR were calculated, and their predictive performances were assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics revealed a median age of 65.5 years, predominantly adenocarcinoma histology (82.9%), and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) in 61.4% of cases. Neither NLR, ANC nor dNLR showed significant associations with known clinical outcome influencers like age, PD-L1 expression, or performance status, but dNLR correlated significantly with initial response (P=0.02). While NLR ≥5 was significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively), dNLR >2.5 (P=0.008) or ANC >7.5 (P=0.02) showed significance in predicting poorer OS only. Optimal cut-off values were determined as 5.0 for NLR [area under the curve (AUC) =0.570], 9.00 for ANC (AUC =0.683) and 2.496 for dNLR (AUC =0.610) for OS prediction. Cox regressions revealed no significant association between either biomarker and clinical or histological cofactors. Subgroup analyses suggested NLR's predictive consistency across various subgroups, whereas dNLR and ANC showed limited performance. Both biomarkers demonstrated significant association with OS in patients exposed to ICI alone, but not with chemotherapy combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The results underscore the potential of NLR as a predictor of survival and progression in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy, while dNLR and ANC demonstrate more limited interest. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and further elucidate their clinical utility.

摘要

背景

肺癌,尤其是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),尽管包括免疫疗法在内的治疗方法有所进步,但因其高发病率和较差的预后,对全球健康构成了重大挑战。虽然程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达是常用的生物标志物,但其局限性使得探索中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)和衍生NLR(dNLR)等替代标志物成为必要。这项回顾性研究旨在直接比较NLR、ANC和dNLR作为一线NSCLC免疫治疗的预测生物标志物,以阐明它们的预后意义和潜在临床应用价值。

方法

这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了70例连续诊断为转移性NSCLC的患者,于2015年9月至2023年3月在法国兰斯大学医院接受一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗。收集了基线临床特征和血液学值,并根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)进行生存分析,包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。计算了NLR和dNLR,并评估了它们的预测性能。

结果

基线特征显示,中位年龄为65.5岁,主要组织学类型为腺癌(82.9%),61.4%的病例中PD-L1高表达(≥50%)。NLR、ANC和dNLR均未显示与年龄、PD-L1表达或体能状态等已知临床结局影响因素有显著关联,但dNLR与初始反应显著相关(P=0.02)。虽然NLR≥5与较短的PFS和OS显著相关(分别为P=0.03和P<0.001),但dNLR>2.5(P=0.008)或ANC>7.5(P=0.02)仅在预测较差的OS方面具有显著性。确定OS预测的NLR最佳临界值为5.0[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.570],ANC为9.00(AUC =0.683),dNLR为2.496(AUC =0.610)。Cox回归显示,这些生物标志物与临床或组织学辅助因素之间均无显著关联。亚组分析表明,NLR在各个亚组中的预测一致性较好,而dNLR和ANC的性能有限。两种生物标志物在仅接受ICI治疗的患者中均与OS显著相关,但与化疗联合治疗无关。

结论

结果强调了NLR作为免疫治疗NSCLC患者生存和进展预测指标的潜力,而dNLR和ANC的价值较为有限。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些观察结果,并进一步阐明它们的临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53f9/12082228/e3d3693e3c4f/tlcr-14-04-1212-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验