• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位会影响直肠癌腹部手术的手术技术选择吗?

Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?

作者信息

Dehlaghi Jadid Kaveh, Gadan Soran, Wallin Göran, Nordenvall Caroline, Boman Sol Erika, Myrberg Ida Hed, Matthiessen Peter

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2025 May;27(5):e70111. doi: 10.1111/codi.70111.

DOI:10.1111/codi.70111
PMID:40387083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12087270/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to estimate the impact of socioeconomic status on the probability of receiving open (OPEN) or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for curative abdominal rectal cancer resection.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with rectal cancer clinical Stage I-III during the period 2010-2021 who underwent curative abdominal resection surgery, MIS or OPEN, were included. Patients were identified in the Colorectal Cancer Database, a register-linkage based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register and linked to several national Swedish health-related and demographic registers. Socioeconomic factors, sex, patient and tumour characteristics, number of previous surgical procedures and category of hospital were collected. Exposures were level of education (categorized as 6-9, 10-12, >12 years), household income (quartiles 1-4) and country of birth (Sweden, Nordic countries outside Sweden, Europe outside the Nordic countries, outside Europe), and outcome was MIS or OPEN. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for each exposure, adjusted for age, sex, cT and cN, level of tumour, and number of previous abdominal surgical procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 13 778 patients were included of whom 43.6% underwent MIS (n = 6007) and 56.4% OPEN (n = 7771). Highest level of education (OR for highest vs. lowest level of education 1.15; 95% CI 1.03-1.29) and highest household income quartile (OR for highest vs. lowest household income quartile 1.27; 95% CI 1.12-1.44) increased the likelihood of receiving MIS.

CONCLUSION

Despite the tax-financed healthcare system in Sweden, rectal cancer patients with the highest level of education and the highest household income had an increased probability of receiving MIS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估社会经济地位对根治性腹直肠癌切除采用开放手术(OPEN)或微创手术(MIS)概率的影响。

方法

纳入2010年至2021年期间所有诊断为临床I - III期直肠癌且接受了根治性腹部切除术(MIS或OPEN)的患者。患者通过结直肠癌数据库识别,该数据库是基于瑞典结直肠癌登记处的登记链接,并与瑞典几个国家健康相关和人口登记处相链接。收集了社会经济因素、性别、患者和肿瘤特征、既往手术次数以及医院类别。暴露因素为教育水平(分为6 - 9年、10 - 12年、>12年)、家庭收入(四分位数1 - 4)和出生国家(瑞典、瑞典以外的北欧国家、北欧以外的欧洲国家、欧洲以外),结局为MIS或OPEN。针对每个暴露因素拟合多变量逻辑回归模型,并对年龄、性别、cT和cN、肿瘤分期以及既往腹部手术次数进行调整。

结果

共纳入13778例患者,其中43.6%接受了MIS(n = 6007),56.4%接受了OPEN(n = 7771)。最高教育水平(最高与最低教育水平相比的OR为1.15;95%CI为1.03 - 1.29)和最高家庭收入四分位数(最高与最低家庭收入四分位数相比的OR为1.27;95%CI为1.12 - 1.44)增加了接受MIS的可能性。

结论

尽管瑞典实行税收资助的医疗保健系统,但教育水平最高和家庭收入最高的直肠癌患者接受MIS的概率增加。

相似文献

1
Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?社会经济地位会影响直肠癌腹部手术的手术技术选择吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2025 May;27(5):e70111. doi: 10.1111/codi.70111.
2
Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.微创直肠癌切除术相较于开放性切除术具有更好的病理和临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3435-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07120-2. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).老年直肠癌患者的微创外科手术:一项来自英联邦结直肠肿瘤登记处(BCCA)的分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;46(9):1649-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.224. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.微创与开放直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的结果:基于两国结直肠癌症审核数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):778-787. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001654.
5
National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.国家间微创结直肠癌手术实施的差异及其对短期结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5986-6001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.与直肠癌微创手术方法使用相关的是保险状况,而非种族。
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):774-781. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001781.
7
Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes.欧洲的微创结直肠癌手术:实施情况与结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(22):e3812. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003812.
8
Postoperative bowel dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer - Does a minimally invasive surgical approach improve outcomes?直肠癌患者术后肠功能障碍 - 微创外科方法是否能改善结局?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;50(12):108661. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108661. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
9
Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.微创与开放联合脏器切除术治疗侵犯相邻器官的直肠癌:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3263-3272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10844-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
10
National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.老年人直肠癌微创手术应用的国家差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):126-135. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17467. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A Validation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register - With Focus on Histopathology, Complications and Recurrences.瑞典结直肠癌登记册的验证——重点关注组织病理学、并发症和复发情况。
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 9;16:525-532. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S466029. eCollection 2024.
2
CRCBaSe: a Swedish register-based resource for colorectal adenocarcinoma research.CrcBase:一个基于瑞典登记的结直肠腺癌研究资源。
Acta Oncol. 2023 Apr;62(4):342-349. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2197121. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.种族和民族在微创二尖瓣手术中的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2247968. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47968.
4
Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of primary robotic hernia repair.初级机器人疝修补术利用中的社会经济差异。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4829-4833. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09627-7. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Differential Effects of Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Insurance on Disease-Specific Survival in Rectal Cancer.种族、社会经济地位和保险对直肠癌疾病特异性生存的差异影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Sep 1;66(9):1263-1272. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002341. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
6
Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer - A population-based nationwide noninferiority study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果 - 一项基于人群的全国性非劣效性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1308-1317. doi: 10.1111/codi.16204. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Racial disparities in minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy for upper GI malignancies.上消化道恶性肿瘤微创食管切除术和胃切除术的种族差异。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9355-9363. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09210-0. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade.医院因素和社会经济地位与十余年来结直肠癌微创手术利用的关联。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3750-3762. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08690-w. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.微创普通外科手术机会的不平等:20 年来的全国性综合分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6227-6243. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities After Surgical Resection for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌手术切除后的种族和社会经济差异。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:449-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 12.