Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗单药治疗或联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎:一项随机临床试验。

Tocilizumab Monotherapy or Combined With Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Liu Tian, Wang Li, Zhang Xiao, Chen Linjie, Liu Yi, Jiang Zhenyu, Shuai Zongwen, Zhang Miaojia, Wei Wei, Liu Huaxiang, Xu Jian, Zhang Zhiyi, Wang Guochun, Wang Xiaoxia, Hu Jiankang, Li Hongbin, Zhang Zhuoli, Wang Hongzhi, Lu Fuai, Du Yingjue, Xue Zenghui, Zhao Yan, Li Zhanguo

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511095. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11095.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Treatment options are needed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experience inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The efficacy and safety profiles of subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy, tocilizumab combined with methotrexate, and methotrexate alone have not yet been evaluated in the same large-scale study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy, tocilizumab-methotrexate, and methotrexate alone for patients with RA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind, large-scale phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 19 sites in China from July 2017 through August 2022, with a 24-week double-blind treatment phase, a 24-week extension phase, and 8 additional weeks of safety follow-up. The trial included adults (aged 18-70 years) who had moderate to severe active RA and had experienced an inadequate response to csDMARDs.

INTERVENTIONS

In the 24-week double-blind treatment phase, patients were randomized 2:2:1 to tocilizumab-methotrexate, tocilizumab-placebo, or methotrexate-placebo. In the 24-week extension phase, patients who achieved a disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28) of up to 3.2 at week 24 continued their double-blind phase treatment; those with scores greater than 3.2 received open-label tocilizumab-methotrexate. Tocilizumab (162 mg) was administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks; oral methotrexate (10-25 mg) was administered once weekly.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary efficacy end point was week 24 American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response. Long-term efficacy analysis was carried out at week 48; safety was monitored for 56 weeks.

RESULTS

This study included 340 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.5 [11.7] years; 294 women [86.5%]). A total of 136 patients were randomized to tocilizumab-methotrexate, 136 to tocilizumab-placebo, and 68 to methotrexate-placebo. The week 24 ACR20 response rate was significantly greater with tocilizumab-methotrexate and tocilizumab-placebo vs methotrexate-placebo (72 of 136 [52.9%] vs 17 of 68 [25.0%]; difference, 27.9 percentage points [95% CI, 14.7-41.2 percentage points]; P < .001; and 68 of 136 [50.0%] vs 17 of 68 [25.0%]; difference, 25.0 percentage points [95% CI, 11.7-38.3 percentage points]; P < .001). The week 48 analysis demonstrated improved or maintained efficacy during the extension period in patients who continued double-blind tocilizumab-placebo or tocilizumab-methotrexate treatment; patients who switched from double-blind tocilizumab-placebo or tocilizumab-methotrexate to open-label tocilizumab-methotrexate had improved disease status. No new safety signals were observed for tocilizumab.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large-scale randomized clinical trial evaluating subcutaneous tocilizumab in Chinese patients, subcutaneous tocilizumab, either as monotherapy or combined with methotrexate, demonstrated superior efficacy to methotrexate monotherapy and was well tolerated. More research data in ethnically and regionally more diverse populations may be needed to further confirm the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab, especially as monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03155347; China Center for Drug Evaluation Identifier: CTR20170141.

摘要

重要性

对于对传统合成抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)反应不足的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者,需要有更多的治疗选择。皮下注射托珠单抗单药治疗、托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤以及单独使用甲氨蝶呤的疗效和安全性尚未在同一大规模研究中进行评估。

目的

评估皮下注射托珠单抗单药治疗、托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤联合治疗以及单独使用甲氨蝶呤治疗RA患者的疗效和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:这项双盲、大规模3期随机临床试验于2017年7月至2022年8月在中国的19个地点进行,有一个24周的双盲治疗阶段、一个24周的延长期以及额外8周的安全性随访。试验纳入了年龄在18 - 70岁、患有中度至重度活动性RA且对csDMARDs反应不足的成年人。

干预措施

在24周的双盲治疗阶段,患者按2:2:1随机分为托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤组、托珠单抗 - 安慰剂组或甲氨蝶呤 - 安慰剂组。在24周的延长期,在第24周达到使用28个关节的疾病活动评分(DAS28)≤3.2的患者继续双盲阶段治疗;评分大于3.2的患者接受开放标签的托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤治疗。托珠单抗(162毫克)每2周皮下注射一次;口服甲氨蝶呤(10 - 25毫克)每周服用一次。

主要结局和测量指标

主要疗效终点是第24周美国风湿病学会改善20%(ACR20)反应。在第48周进行长期疗效分析;安全性监测56周。

结果

本研究纳入了340例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,47.5[11.7]岁;294名女性[86.5%])。共有136例患者随机分配至托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤组,136例至托珠单抗 - 安慰剂组,68例至甲氨蝶呤 - 安慰剂组。与甲氨蝶呤 - 安慰剂组相比,托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤组和托珠单抗 - 安慰剂组的第24周ACR20反应率显著更高(136例中的72例[52.9%]对68例中的17例[25.0%];差异为27.9个百分点[95%置信区间,14.7 - 41.2个百分点];P < .001;以及136例中的68例[50.0%]对68例中的17例[25.0%];差异为25.0个百分点[95%置信区间,11.7 - 38.3个百分点];P < .001)。第48周分析表明,继续接受双盲托珠单抗 - 安慰剂或托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者在延长期疗效得到改善或维持;从双盲托珠单抗 - 安慰剂或托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤转换为开放标签托珠单抗 - 甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者疾病状态有所改善。未观察到托珠单抗有新的安全信号。

结论和相关性

在这项评估中国患者皮下注射托珠单抗的大规模随机临床试验中,皮下注射托珠单抗单药治疗或联合甲氨蝶呤治疗均显示出优于甲氨蝶呤单药治疗的疗效,且耐受性良好。可能需要在种族和地区更加多样化的人群中进行更多研究数据,以进一步证实皮下注射托珠单抗的疗效和安全性,尤其是作为单药治疗时。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03155347;中国药品审评中心标识符:CTR20170141。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验