Gustavson Daniel E, Borriello Giulia A, Karhadkar Mohini A, Rhee Soo Hyun, Corley Robin P, Rhea Sally-Ann, DiLalla Lisabeth F, Wadsworth Sally J, Friedman Naomi P, Reynolds Chandra A
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 27;122(21):e2426531122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2426531122. Epub 2025 May 19.
Measures of general cognitive ability (GCA) are highly stable from adolescence onward, particularly at the level of genetic influences. In contrast, measurement of GCA in early life (before 3 y old) is less reliable and less is known about the stability of GCA across this period, including its relation to adult GCA. Using data from the Colorado Longitudinal Twin study (N = 1,098), we examined the stability of GCA measures across 5 time-points (years 1 to 2, 3, 7, 16, and 29), including how an array of cognitive measures given at 7 and 9 mo relate to later GCA. We then examined the genetic and environmental stability of GCA across the first 30 y of life using complementary methods: twin analyses and polygenic scores (PGSs). Two infant cognition measures, object novelty and tester-rated task orientation, predicted GCA in adulthood ( = 0.16 and 0.18, respectively). Correlational analyses were consistent with a pattern of increasing stability across development for GCA measures between year 1 to 2 and adulthood ( = 0.39 to 0.85). Subsequent twin analyses revealed that 22% of variance in adulthood GCA was captured by genetic influences on GCA from year 3 or earlier, with an additional 10% explained by shared environmental influences on GCA at year 1 to 2. PGSs for adulthood GCA and educational attainment predicted GCA from 1 to 2 y onward (s = 0.09 to 0.44) but not infant cognition. Findings suggest that genetic and environmental influences on GCA demonstrate considerable stability as early as age 3 y, but that measures of infant cognition are less predictive of later cognitive ability.
一般认知能力(GCA)的测量从青春期开始就高度稳定,尤其是在基因影响层面。相比之下,生命早期(3岁之前)GCA的测量可靠性较低,对于这一时期GCA的稳定性,包括其与成人GCA的关系,我们了解得也较少。利用科罗拉多纵向双胞胎研究的数据(N = 1098),我们考察了GCA测量在5个时间点(1至2岁、3岁、7岁、16岁和29岁)之间的稳定性,包括7个月和9个月时进行的一系列认知测量与后期GCA的关系。然后,我们使用互补方法:双胞胎分析和多基因分数(PGS),考察了生命最初30年GCA的遗传和环境稳定性。两项婴儿认知测量指标,即物体新奇性和测试者评定的任务导向性,预测了成年后的GCA(分别为0.16和0.18)。相关分析与1至2岁到成年期GCA测量稳定性不断增加的模式一致(相关系数为0.39至0.85)。随后的双胞胎分析表明,成年期GCA中22%的变异由3岁或更早时对GCA的基因影响所解释,另外10%由1至2岁时对GCA的共享环境影响所解释。成年期GCA和教育程度的PGS预测了1至2岁以后的GCA(相关系数为0.09至0.44),但不能预测婴儿认知。研究结果表明,对GCA的基因和环境影响早在3岁时就表现出相当的稳定性,但婴儿认知测量对后期认知能力的预测性较低。