Yang Qiong-Fang, Shu Cai-Min
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 16;104(20):e42434. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042434.
Concurrent acute massive brainstem infarction and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) present a critical therapeutic dilemma due to contraindications for thrombolysis in acute stroke. Such cases are rarely reported, and optimal management strategies remain undefined. This case highlights the challenges and underscores the importance of timely mechanical intervention in life-threatening dual pathologies.
A 63-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with partial paralysis of his left leg, which had been unresponsive for 7 hours. In the emergency department, magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed multiple recent infarctions of the brainstem and right cerebellar hemisphere. The patient was therefore diagnosed with an acute cerebral infarction. After nearly a week of treatment, including anticoagulation and plaque stabilization, his condition improved significantly. On his seventh day of hospitalization, after waking up and going to the bathroom, his oxygenation suddenly decreased, accompanied by hypotension and shock.
After a comprehensive analysis, we considered the possibility of a PE. Subsequent computed tomographic pulmonary angiography confirmed this to be the case, pointing to a massive high-risk lesion.
Anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin failed to stabilize hemodynamics. Multidisciplinary consensus prioritized pulmonary artery thrombectomy with catheter-directed thrombolysis, avoiding systemic thrombolysis risks.
Post-thrombectomy, hemodynamic stability was restored. Anticoagulation was successfully transitioned from unfractionated heparin to rivaroxaban, achieving complete thrombus resolution at 3 months. The patient regained functional capacity without hemorrhagic complications.
This case demonstrates that pulmonary artery thrombectomy is a viable lifesaving option for high-risk PE when thrombolysis is contraindicated in acute stroke. It emphasizes the role of multidisciplinary decision-making and mechanical interventions in dual critical pathologies, offering a framework for managing similar complex cases.
急性大面积脑干梗死与高危肺栓塞(PE)并存时,由于急性卒中溶栓存在禁忌,会带来关键的治疗困境。此类病例鲜有报道,最佳管理策略仍不明确。本病例突出了挑战,并强调了对危及生命的双重病变及时进行机械干预的重要性。
一名63岁男性因左腿部分瘫痪入院,该症状已持续7小时无缓解。在急诊科,头部磁共振成像显示脑干和右小脑半球近期有多处梗死。因此,该患者被诊断为急性脑梗死。经过近一周的治疗,包括抗凝和斑块稳定,其病情显著改善。住院第七天,患者醒来后去卫生间,随后氧合突然下降,伴有低血压和休克。
综合分析后,我们考虑了肺栓塞的可能性。随后的计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影证实了这一情况,显示为大面积高危病变。
使用普通肝素抗凝未能稳定血流动力学。多学科达成共识,优先采用导管定向溶栓的肺动脉血栓切除术,避免全身溶栓风险。
血栓切除术后,血流动力学恢复稳定。抗凝治疗成功从普通肝素过渡到利伐沙班,3个月时血栓完全溶解。患者恢复了功能,且无出血并发症。
本病例表明,当急性卒中溶栓禁忌时,肺动脉血栓切除术是治疗高危肺栓塞的一种可行的挽救生命的选择。它强调了多学科决策和机械干预在双重危急病变中的作用,为管理类似复杂病例提供了一个框架。