• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结核病护理质量评估:评估2018年至2022年韩国的诊断和治疗效果

Tuberculosis Care Quality Assessment: Evaluating Diagnosis and Treatment Effectiveness in Korea, 2018 to 2022.

作者信息

Gu Kang-Mo, Min Jinsoo

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2025 Jul;88(3):566-574. doi: 10.4046/trd.2025.0020. Epub 2025 May 19.

DOI:10.4046/trd.2025.0020
PMID:40388985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12235286/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) care quality assessment has been implemented in the Republic of Korea since 2018. This paper evaluates the results of six rounds of the quality assessment from 2018 to 2023, focusing on the sixth quality assessment in 2023.

METHODS

This study used cross-linked databases from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, and the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The study population included newly diagnosed TB patients reported between January and June each year from 2016 to 2023. The sixth quality assessment employed five indicators, which included the treatment success rate. Trends were analyzed using linear regression, and statistical comparisons were performed using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

The sixth quality assessment demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all indicators. Since the fifth assessment, over 95% of patients diagnosed with respiratory TB have undergone TB confirmation tests. Both phenotype and molecular drug susceptibility test coverages showed significant upward trends since the third and fourth assessments, respectively. The treatment success rate, introduced for the first time in the sixth assessment, was reported at 78.3%. Non-TB-related deaths (10.3%) were the most common outcome, other than treatment success.

CONCLUSION

The TB care quality assessment has contributed to standardizing TB care in Korea and improving management indicators. Further efforts are needed to enhance treatment success through refining the evaluation criteria and implementing innovative management strategies.

摘要

背景

自2018年起,韩国开始实施结核病(TB)护理质量评估。本文评估了2018年至2023年六轮质量评估的结果,重点关注2023年的第六次质量评估。

方法

本研究使用了来自健康保险审查和评估服务局、韩国疾病控制和预防机构以及内政和安全部的交联数据库。研究人群包括2016年至2023年每年1月至6月报告的新诊断结核病患者。第六次质量评估采用了五个指标,其中包括治疗成功率。使用线性回归分析趋势,并使用卡方检验进行统计比较。

结果

第六次质量评估显示所有指标均有统计学意义的改善。自第五次评估以来,超过95%的呼吸道结核病确诊患者接受了结核病确诊检查。自第三次和第四次评估以来,表型和分子药敏试验覆盖率均呈现显著上升趋势。第六次评估首次引入的治疗成功率报告为78.3%。除治疗成功外,非结核病相关死亡(10.3%)是最常见的结果。

结论

结核病护理质量评估有助于韩国结核病护理的标准化和管理指标的改善。需要进一步努力,通过完善评估标准和实施创新管理策略来提高治疗成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0019/12235286/fa882b58bf08/trd-2025-0020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0019/12235286/fa882b58bf08/trd-2025-0020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0019/12235286/fa882b58bf08/trd-2025-0020f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Tuberculosis Care Quality Assessment: Evaluating Diagnosis and Treatment Effectiveness in Korea, 2018 to 2022.结核病护理质量评估:评估2018年至2022年韩国的诊断和治疗效果
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2025 Jul;88(3):566-574. doi: 10.4046/trd.2025.0020. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay for detecting active tuberculosis in HIV-positive adults.用于检测HIV阳性成年人活动性结核病的侧向流动尿液脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖检测法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 10;2016(5):CD011420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011420.pub2.
7
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
10
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in tuberculosis: a new ally in disease control.人工智能在结核病防治中的应用:疾病控制的新助力
Breathe (Sheff). 2024 Dec 10;20(3):240056. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0056-2024. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
The global impact of COVID-19 on tuberculosis: A thematic scoping review, 2020-2023.2020 - 2023年新冠疫情对结核病的全球影响:一项主题范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;4(7):e0003043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003043. eCollection 2024.
3
Artificial intelligence-based radiographic extent analysis to predict tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a multicenter cohort study.
基于人工智能的放射学范围分析预测结核病治疗结局:一项多中心队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 7;14(1):13162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63885-0.
4
Prevalence and Characteristics of Tuberculosis in the Korean Homeless Population Based on Nationwide Tuberculosis Screening.基于全国结核病筛查的韩国无家可归人群结核病患病率及特征
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2024 Oct;87(4):514-523. doi: 10.4046/trd.2023.0197. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Public-Private Partnership for Tuberculosis Care and Prevention in Korea.韩国结核病防治公私合作伙伴关系。
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2024 Oct;87(4):543-546. doi: 10.4046/trd.2024.0022. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
Tuberculosis Notification and Incidence: Republic of Korea, 2022.结核病通报与发病率:大韩民国,2022年
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2024 Jul;87(3):411-413. doi: 10.4046/trd.2024.0018. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
Risk of loss to follow-up among tuberculosis patients in South Korea: whom should we focus on?韩国结核患者随访失访风险:我们应该关注谁?
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 19;11:1247772. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1247772. eCollection 2023.
8
TB in ageing populations: lessons from Japan and Korea.老龄化人口中的结核病:来自日本和韩国的经验教训。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 Aug 1;27(11):869-871. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.23.0145.
9
Deaths from tuberculosis: differences between tuberculosis-related and non-tuberculosis-related deaths.结核病死亡:结核病相关死亡与非结核病相关死亡的差异。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 1;11:1207284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1207284. eCollection 2023.
10
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis control in Indonesia: a nationwide longitudinal analysis of programme data.COVID-19 大流行对印度尼西亚结核病控制的影响:基于方案数据的全国纵向分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Sep;11(9):e1412-e1421. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00312-1.