Tao Tiffany Junchen, Estes Kayley D, Holman E Alison, Vahedifard Farshid, Silver Roxane Cohen
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 May 19;28(1):e301331. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301331.
With the increasing prevalence of climate-related disasters, psychological responses, including climate change anxiety and anticipatory climate disaster stress, have received heightened attention.
We investigate the correlates of climate change anxiety and anticipatory climate disaster stress, as well as the nature of these psychological responses.
At the start of the annual fire season (June to August 2023), we recruited a county-representative sample of n=813 residents of Lake County, in Northern California, to complete an anonymous online survey. Multiple regression analyses identified correlates of climate change anxiety and anticipatory climate disaster stress and explored how anxiety and stress were associated with disaster preparedness.
Climate change anxiety, assessed via its cognitive-emotional impairment (odds ratio (OR)=1.68; OR=2.37) and functional impairment (OR=1.68; OR=2.63) subfactors, and anticipatory climate disaster stress (b=0.15, b=0.26) were associated with previous wildfire-induced loss/injury and media exposure to wildfire-related content. Anticipatory climate disaster stress was also associated with the frequency of being in an evacuation zone (b=0.05). Both the cognitive-emotional impairment subfactor of climate change anxiety (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.23) and anticipatory climate disaster stress (IRR=1.14) were associated with preparing an emergency kit and power outage supplies; anticipatory climate disaster stress was associated with evacuation intentions should an actual fire occur (b=0.12).
Prior experiences with climate disasters could explain people's psychological responses to climate change. These responses could be temporally appropriate and functionally adaptive, given the immediacy of a potential fire.
Climate change anxiety and anticipatory climate disaster stress should not be oversimplified as typical clinical symptoms because their presence might motivate adaptive self-protective behaviours in the face of an upcoming disaster.
随着与气候相关灾害的日益普遍,包括气候变化焦虑和预期气候灾害压力在内的心理反应受到了更多关注。
我们调查气候变化焦虑和预期气候灾害压力的相关因素,以及这些心理反应的性质。
在年度火灾季节开始时(2023年6月至8月),我们招募了加利福尼亚州北部莱克县具有县代表性的n = 813名居民样本,以完成一项匿名在线调查。多元回归分析确定了气候变化焦虑和预期气候灾害压力的相关因素,并探讨了焦虑和压力与灾害准备的关联。
通过其认知 - 情感损害(优势比(OR)= 1.68;OR = 2.37)和功能损害(OR = 1.68;OR = 2.63)子因素评估的气候变化焦虑,以及预期气候灾害压力(b = 0.15,b = 0.26)与先前野火导致的损失/伤害以及媒体对野火相关内容的曝光有关。预期气候灾害压力也与处于疏散区的频率有关(b = 0.05)。气候变化焦虑的认知 - 情感损害子因素(发病率比(IRR)= 1.23)和预期气候灾害压力(IRR = 1.14)均与准备应急包和停电用品有关;预期气候灾害压力与实际发生火灾时的疏散意图有关(b = 0.12)。
先前的气候灾害经历可以解释人们对气候变化的心理反应。鉴于潜在火灾的紧迫性,这些反应在时间上可能是适当的,在功能上是适应性的。
气候变化焦虑和预期气候灾害压力不应被过度简化为典型的临床症状,因为它们的存在可能会促使人们在即将到来的灾难面前采取适应性的自我保护行为。