Akbari Mohammadreza, Poustchi Hossein, Taherifard Erfan, Mehrian Seyed Reza Abdipour, Rahimian Zahra, Mesgarpour Bita, Pourfarzi Farhad, Gharekhani Afshin, Nejatizadeh Azim, Moradpour Farhad, Piraie Elahe, Fakhraei Bahareh, Joukar Farahnaz, Saki Nader, Safarpour Ali Reza, Moradinazar Mehdi, Rezaianzadeh Abbas, Tafaghodi Mohsen, Esmaeili-Nadimi Ali, Moslem Alireza, Alijanvand Moluk Hadi, Moosazadeh Mahmood, Mehrparvar Amir Houshang, Ansari-Moghaddam Alireza, Taherifard Ehsan, Ghahramani SaharNaz, Pakroo Mahsa, Mohammadi Zahra, Malekzadeh Reza, Vardanjani Hossein Molavi
Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 19;25(1):1842. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23062-y.
Socioeconomic status (SES) and education influence medication use, but their effects at both individual and community levels remain poorly understood. This study investigates the association between medication count and polypharmacy with SES and education at both levels.
We used data from the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in IrAN (PERSIAN), comprising 163,770 individuals aged 35-70 from 18 sites in Iran. Individual SES was evaluated using asset analysis, while community SES was determined based on the prevalence of low SES individuals in each site. Individual education level was dichotomized into having at least 5 years of schooling or not, while community education level was determined by the frequency of individuals with high education level in each site. Multi-level Poisson regressions, were conducted to explore the association between these variables and medication count in this cross-sectional study.
Approximately 45% of participants used at least one medication, with an average of 1.32 medications per person. Polypharmacy was observed in 8.85% of the population. Higher individual SES was associated with a slightly increased medication count (PR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.08) and a modest increase in polypharmacy risk (PR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.14). Residing in middle-SES communities was linked to lower medication use (PR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.85-0.91) but was not significantly associated with polypharmacy. Higher individual education was associated with reduced medication count (PR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.96) and a lower likelihood of polypharmacy (PR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.79-0.91). However, living in highly educated communities was associated with increased medication count (PR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.62-1.78) and a higher risk of polypharmacy (PR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16-2.81). The models were adjusted for age, gender, residence, ethnicity, marital status, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking status, opium use, hookah use, and alcohol consumption.
Higher education was associated with lower medication use, whereas living in more educated communities was linked to higher usage. Although the association between individual SES and medication use was relatively weak, residing in middle-SES communities was associated with lower medication usage. These findings show the importance of addressing community-level factors in health research and policymaking.
社会经济地位(SES)和教育程度会影响药物使用,但它们在个体和社区层面的影响仍知之甚少。本研究在两个层面调查了用药数量和多重用药与SES及教育程度之间的关联。
我们使用了伊朗前瞻性流行病学研究(PERSIAN)的数据,该数据包含来自伊朗18个地点的163770名年龄在35至70岁之间的个体。个体SES通过资产分析进行评估,而社区SES则根据每个地点低SES个体的患病率来确定。个体教育水平被分为接受至少5年学校教育和未接受至少5年学校教育两类,而社区教育水平则由每个地点高学历个体的频率来确定。在这项横断面研究中,我们进行了多层次泊松回归分析,以探讨这些变量与用药数量之间的关联。
约45%的参与者使用了至少一种药物,人均用药1.32种。8.85%的人群存在多重用药情况。较高的个体SES与用药数量略有增加(PR 1.05;95% CI:1.02 - 1.08)以及多重用药风险适度增加(PR 1.08;95% CI:1.03 - 1.14)相关。居住在中等SES社区与较低的药物使用相关(PR 0.88;95% CI:0.85 - 0.91),但与多重用药无显著关联。较高的个体教育程度与用药数量减少(PR 0.92;95% CI:0.88 - 0.96)以及多重用药可能性降低(PR 0.85;95% CI:0.79 - 0.91)相关。然而,生活在高学历社区与用药数量增加(PR 1.70;95% CI:1.62 - 1.78)以及多重用药风险更高(PR 1.81;95% CI:1.16 - 2.81)相关。模型对年龄、性别、居住地区、种族、婚姻状况、体重指数、身体活动水平、吸烟状况、鸦片使用、水烟使用和饮酒情况进行了调整。
较高的教育程度与较低的药物使用相关,而生活在教育程度更高的社区则与更高的药物使用相关。虽然个体SES与药物使用之间的关联相对较弱,但居住在中等SES社区与较低的药物使用相关。这些发现表明在健康研究和政策制定中考虑社区层面因素的重要性。