Iqbal Anum, Richardson Charlotte, Iqbal Zain, O'Keefe Hannah, Hanratty Barbara, Matthews Fiona E, Todd Adam
School of Pharmacy, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, King's Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, England.
School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03835-z.
Socioeconomic status (SES) may influence prescribing, concordance and adherence to medication regimens. This review set out to investigate the association between polypharmacy and an individual's socioeconomic status.
A systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies was conducted across four databases. Older people (≥ 55 years) from any healthcare setting and residing location were included. The search was conducted across four databases: Medline (OVID), Web of Science, Embase (OVID) and CINAHL. Observational studies from 1990 that reported polypharmacy according to SES were included. A random-effects model was undertaken comparing those with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medication usage) with no polypharmacy. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and standard errors (SE) were calculated for each study.
Fifty-four articles from 13,412 hits screened met the inclusion criteria. The measure of SES used were education (50 studies), income (18 studies), wealth (6 studies), occupation (4 studies), employment (7 studies), social class (5 studies), SES categories (2 studies) and deprivation (1 study). Thirteen studies were excluded from the meta-analysis. Lower SES was associated with higher polypharmacy usage: individuals of lower educational backgrounds displayed 21% higher odds to be in receipt of polypharmacy when compared to those of higher education backgrounds. Similar findings were shown for occupation, income, social class, and socioeconomic categories.
There are socioeconomic inequalities in polypharmacy among older people, with people of lower SES significantly having higher odds of polypharmacy. Future work could examine the reasons for these inequalities and explore the interplay between polypharmacy and multimorbidity.
社会经济地位(SES)可能会影响药物处方、医患间的协定以及对药物治疗方案的依从性。本综述旨在研究多重用药与个体社会经济地位之间的关联。
对四个数据库进行了观察性研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。纳入来自任何医疗机构和居住地点的老年人(≥55岁)。检索了四个数据库:Medline(OVID)、科学网、Embase(OVID)和护理学与健康领域数据库。纳入1990年以来根据社会经济地位报告多重用药情况的观察性研究。采用随机效应模型,比较多重用药者(使用≥5种药物)和非多重用药者。计算每项研究的未调整优势比(OR)、95%置信区间(CI)和标准误(SE)。
从13412条检索结果中筛选出的54篇文章符合纳入标准。所使用的社会经济地位衡量指标包括教育程度(50项研究)、收入(18项研究)、财富(6项研究)、职业(4项研究)、就业情况(7项研究)、社会阶层(5项研究)、社会经济地位类别(2项研究)和贫困状况(1项研究)。13项研究被排除在荟萃分析之外。较低的社会经济地位与较高的多重用药使用率相关:与高学历背景的人相比,低学历背景个体接受多重用药的几率高21%。职业、收入、社会阶层和社会经济类别方面也有类似发现。
老年人多重用药存在社会经济不平等现象,社会经济地位较低者多重用药的几率显著更高。未来的研究可以探讨这些不平等现象的原因,并探索多重用药与多种疾病并存之间的相互作用。