Ganesh Siddhi S, Gould Erin E, Smeltzer Rebecca P, Goldshear Jesse L, Huh Jimi, Ceasar Rachel Carmen, Bluthenthal Ricky N
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases & Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 19;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01223-x.
Among people who inject drugs and use opioids, the vast majority have reported experiencing opioid withdrawal symptoms during the past six months. People who use opioids experience significant impediments from withdrawal symptoms, including increased risk behaviors associated with overdose, bloodborne infection, and other negative health outcomes. We undertook this analysis to understand how social and structural forces shaped experiences of withdrawal risk, navigation, and management among a community sample of people who use opioids and inject drugs in Los Angeles, California. We conducted 30 semi-structured, in-depth interviews at community sites in Los Angeles. Qualitative data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Our findings indicate that: 1) when people who use opioids experienced overlapping structural conditions (such as unsheltered houselessness and material difficulty) withdrawal becamea vulnerability and was prioritized first 2) severe material hardships necessitated that participants prioritized withdrawal to engage in their daily income generation activities, 3) participants engaged in higher risk behaviors in order to manage intense and urgent withdrawal symptoms, which led to shifts towards stigmatized and criminalized identities and negative self-appraisal. Overlapping structural vulnerabilities such as housing insecurity, material hardship, experiencing theft, and financial precarity compress risks associated with withdrawal while simultaneously constricting ways in which individuals can manage symptoms. Our findings point to ways in which existing withdrawal management options may be made more effective and accessible via structural support such as housing, income, and basic needs support. MOUD expansion may empower people who actively use opioids to navigate complex structural vulnerabilities from a place of assurance rather than urgency and fear; thereby serving as a harm reduction tool that disrupts the cycle of withdrawal management and material precarity.
在注射毒品并使用阿片类药物的人群中,绝大多数人报告在过去六个月内经历过阿片类药物戒断症状。使用阿片类药物的人会因戒断症状而面临重大障碍,包括与过量用药、血液传播感染及其他负面健康结果相关的风险行为增加。我们进行此项分析,以了解社会和结构力量如何塑造加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市使用阿片类药物并注射毒品的社区样本人群在戒断风险、应对及管理方面的经历。我们在洛杉矶的社区场所进行了30次半结构化深度访谈。定性数据采用建构主义扎根理论进行分析。我们的研究结果表明:1)当使用阿片类药物的人经历重叠的结构状况(如无庇护的无家可归和物质困难)时,戒断成为一种脆弱性并被优先考虑;2)严重的物质困难使参与者为了从事日常创收活动而优先处理戒断问题;3)参与者为了应对强烈且紧急的戒断症状而采取更高风险的行为,这导致他们转向被污名化和定罪的身份以及负面的自我评价。住房不安全、物质困难、遭遇盗窃和经济不稳定等重叠的结构脆弱性压缩了与戒断相关的风险,同时限制了个人应对症状的方式。我们的研究结果指出了一些方法,通过住房、收入和基本需求支持等结构支持,现有的戒断管理选项可能会变得更有效且更容易获得。扩大药物辅助治疗(MOUD)可能使积极使用阿片类药物的人从安心而非紧迫和恐惧的状态来应对复杂的结构脆弱性;从而成为一种减少伤害的工具,打破戒断管理和物质不稳定的循环。